Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Canberra Comment 
 2020 summit a breath of fresh ideas 

2020 summit a breath of fresh ideas

I never doubted good ideas would flow at this weekend's 2020 summit in Canberra, but I now think something might even come of them.

You could brand me as one of the sceptics who saw this weekend as a bit of a talk fest - an opportunity for people to cook up a lot of feel good ideas, but no real movement on them after the weekend.

But I've been pleasantly surprised.

The burst of good, practical, achievable ideas put forward by delegates in the future of rural and regional industries and communities committee have been the empitome of vision.

Delegates who have spent a lot of time and money getting to Canberra haven't come with a list of funding wishes or gripes with government - they've come armed with a sense of responsibility for the future, with a genuine commitment to contribute to some excellent debate on the future direction of the country - their country.

I'm actually disappointed the committee will only have the opportunity to put only one or two ideas directly to the Prime Minister, because there were certainly several with incredible merit which tackle some of the big challenges facing agriculture which would provide the industry with immense opportunity.

What really converted this sceptic though was the surprise drop-in of the Prime Minister who quietly took his seat beside Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, and scribbled notes as he listened to nearly all the ideas developed during day one in the rural stream.

The fact he chose to listen to the rural ideas, rather than sit in on environment, or the economy, or education, should give farmers heart.

The Prime Minister made it clear to delegates yesterday that he saw food security as one fo the big issues facing Australians and the broader global economy, but he also sees Australian farmers as being part of the solution.

Tony Burke has also seemed genuinely impressed with the debate.

My big idea is that Mr Burke and Mr Rudd keep this rural committee alive, and work and consult with these delegates on a regular basis to keep the ideas active, and see more like them developed.

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Lucy; I agree with your big idea ... and would add another: Let's build on Rudd's great idea and make these "Canberra conversations" a regular feature of our national life. (They can only get better.)
Posted by Bushie on 21/04/2008 1:52:02 PM
It is good to know someone actually present at the rural stream discussions saw the incredible amount of dedication and enthusiasm the delegates took upon themselves to produce some realistic results within the very short time frame.

As another of those present, I felt the issue of competing interests in rural land (food production, carbon sequestration, biofuels, mining, housing creep etc etc) provided a very difficult but vital focus.

It was rather like trying to create a road map for a place you have never been.

The discussion succeeded in raising questions that have been noted and put in the final submission.

Strangely, we were unable to solve all the problems of climate change in the alotted one hour!

As Lucy says though, the conversation must continue.

Posted by deb on 22/04/2008 9:32:23 PM
The media and Kevin Rudd should know better than to call the attendees of the 2020 summit, delegates.

Nor does qualifying 100 attendees discussing a given subject make them representative of the community.

Observations of the weekend saw attendees being led about by the nose as they were kept on track by facilitators to ensure they were singing from the prepared sheet of music.

Any conclusions drawn from this gabfest should only be proclaimed as ideas of the ALP.

How can the Prime Minister or anyone use the line, that "Australia has spoken", or, "these fresh new ideas are representative of what Australians want"?

There was no debating of any ideas at the summit, no democratic election of delegates, it was nothing more than spin conducted by the master of spin Kevin Rudd.

Those attendees were not in any position to speak on behalf of anyone accept, themselves.

Ideas such as the abolition of the States and calling for a Republic certainly fits in with the socialists plan and their version of a Republic, giving the centralisation of power to Kevin's politburo.

Whatever happened to intelligent debating or the democratic process?

Have we been dumbed down that much that we cannot even recognise when the wool is being pulled over our eyes?

Posted by Alan Mears on 24/04/2008 8:13:24 AM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Lucy Skuthorp is the Rural Press Canberra Bureau chief based in Parliament House.


30/06/2008 | A series of polls conducted around the country last week have pointed to dangerous times ahead for Labor's grip on power in all States and Territories.
Classies