Opinion 
 Blogs 
 FarmOnline Opinion 
 Gas ads must take real people seriously 

Gas ads must take real people seriously

ON ABC TV's The Gruen Transfer, one of the most popular segments is ''The Pitch'', where rival ad agencies go head to head on a controversial subject. Although it's a joke, the campaigns often manage to strike at the heart of the issues.

This week, two very different outfits decided to give it a go for real, tackling the vexed topic of coal seam gas mining.

First the industry lobby group, the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association, launched a TV blitz to sell us the positives. With a juicy budget funded by numerous energy companies, their ads are now airing nationally.

In the opposite corner, the online lobby group GetUp! has made an ad highlighting the negatives, and are pleading for donations to put it to air.

Both campaigns have a very simple goal. To force us to make up our minds about fracking, the process whereby natural gas (a greenhouse-friendly source of energy) is extracted from rock formations by injecting fluids and chemicals into fractures and splitting them open.

Those fluids potentially find their way into the water table and drinking water, and therein lie public health and environmental concerns, as illustrated so graphically in the US documentary Gasland.

Australian opponents claim not enough research has been done on the threat to aquifers. A recent poll suggested two-thirds of us would support a moratorium until more is known about the environmental impacts. In France, they've already banned fracking. In South Africa, Shell had to withdraw its ''misleading'' fracking ads.

Rick Wilkinson, from the industry lobby group, wants his ads to ''restore the balance'' in the debate, which has so far seen - on the ''unbalanced'' side - a 60,000-strong GetUp! petition, moves by Tony Windsor and the Greens to slow down the industry, a rural movement called ''Lock The Gate Alliance'' whose aim is pretty clear, a disturbing 60 Minutes feature, a Sydney Residents Against Coal Seam Gas lobby group agitating against mining in the metropolitan area, and Bob Katter's Australian Party proposing a one-year ban.

"So,'' as Wil Anderson says to his Gruen combatants, "let's take a look at the ads."

Wilkinson and Co decided to feature ''real people who are impacted by [coal seam gas] and want to tell their own stories''. Built around the slogan of ''We Want CSG'' (I wonder how long it took the copywriter to come up with that one?), the lack of production values in the ads is matched only by the lack of hard information.

Unnamed "real people" stare woodenly at the camera and mutter such inanities as "we need CSG" and "bring it on". Self-interest and evasiveness appear to be the order of the day.

We learn that coal seam gas is "breathing new life into country towns" and that it "means that our young people don't have to leave town for work". But the same, arguably, could have been said about asbestos mining.

The so-called "facts" are merely descriptions of how much money the industry is spending, rather than a serious attempt to address the environmental, health and property-rights issues troubling people. From a strategy point of view, disappointing.

Still smarting, possibly, from the error of their Cate Blanchett carbon tax ad, GetUp! has also decided to feature "real people". But unlike the exploration association's real people, these ones are happy to give us their names as they tell their somewhat alarming stories. The ad successfully taps a rich seam of compelling issues: "If they contaminate our water and land, where have we got to go?"; Gas companies ''can walk right over the top of me" and "The whole industry should be stopped until the science is known".

One thing guaranteed to stir ''not in my back yard'' opposition, it appears, is when you propose to start drilling against people's will in their backyards.

If the coal seam gas lobby is to have any luck reversing this growing public antagonism, its ads are going to have to be more than slogans and obfuscation.

They need to be able to communicate that they understand the concerns and are dealing honestly with them, and then articulate a clear, strategic message that sells the benefits of coal seam gas - including those that go beyond self-interest.

In the meantime, the GetUp! campaign, with its persuasive message and simple execution, is winning this pitch.

Rowan Dean is a Gruen panellist, freelance writer and advertising creative director.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
If I was to dump ANY chemicals in or on the ground remotely like the type or quantity of fraking chemicals the EPA would jail me - right !!? - So there you go, enforce the current laws and jail the bastards.
Posted by Sheepforbrains, 14/09/2011 2:28:33 PM
Since when was coal seam gas not a "fossil fuel". The statement, "a greenhouse-friendly source of energy" is completely erroneous and misleading. Obviously Rowan Dean has, along with many Aussies, been misled by the gas companies propaganda. OK, gas only puts out half the CO2 of coal but it is not a renewable resource and is still a fossil fuel. At least acknowledge this. In any case, we still want the right to say NO to mining on our properties. Without that right, we have no chance of negotiating reasonable terms and miners and government will continue to bulldoze our lives.
Posted by Trugger, 14/09/2011 5:34:46 PM
The CSG push is distorted in NSW by a Government which is hell bent on alliance with big business and royalties from gas.

We will destroy the hand that feeds us to pollute our alluvial rich soil areas' in the face of a Premier (and Country Party) who are actively denying a free alternative in the form of Wind power from Turbines in the ranges of NSW.

This is denial of the opportunity for land that is ideal for quality food production to be mutilated by CSG, yet the poor land where I live is ideally suited to hosting a Wind Farm with little impact on the grazing capacity of my Station.

Posted by broken_gate, 21/09/2011 3:50:50 PM
FarmOnline Opinion
The opinions of agriculture's leaders and thinkers on the big issues of the day.
A still from the We want CSG ad.
A still from the "We want CSG" ad.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
05 September, 2011
BLOGS
13 September, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...