News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 $3.60 a litre to cover the environmental cost of petrol 

$3.60 a litre to cover the environmental cost of petrol

03 Mar, 2010 06:04 AM
HOW does more than $3 for a litre of petrol sound? Steep, especially for struggling families in car-dependent areas, but according to the man who introduced some of America's toughest environmental standards, it reflects the real cost of our dependence on oil.

Terry Tamminen - who was a until recently the head of the California Environmental Protection Agency and a member of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's cabinet - says fuel prices do not include ''externalities'', such as the effects on public health, congestion, even wars to secure foreign oilfields.

''If people were paying the true price at the pump, in the US, it would about $10 a gallon, instead of $3,'' said Mr Tamminen, who will address an NRMA conference in Sydney today on alternative fuels.

If Mr Tamminen's calculation applied to Australia - where one gallon is the equivalent of 3.8 litres - petrol prices would rise from about $1.20 a litre to $3.60.

''We are bearing this cost now, just not at the pump,'' he said. ''Our taxes are higher because of healthcare costs related to lung disease and asthma, the damage to crops and plants that are stunted, environmental clean-up and in the cost of defending oil around the globe, which is not on any company balance sheet [because] the taxpayers pay for that.''

The US Defence Department has revealed that $100 billion is spent every year deploying troops to defend oil interests around the world, not including the Iraq war, which has so far cost $1 trillion.

As Mr Schwarzenegger's environment tsar, Mr Tamminen oversaw the US's toughest vehicle emission laws, which the Obama administration adopted as a national standard.

Even if governments and consumers question the broader costs of oil dependence, Mr Tamminen says they cannot ignore one sobering fact: ''We are going to run out of oil.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"If Mr Tamminen's calculation applied to Australia." Unfortunately, it doesn't. I say unfortunately because I'm American. The US is picking up the worldwide tab for military security at the oil fields.
Posted by A.Lizard, 3/03/2010 8:05:34 AM
Yeah another green fruitcake wanting to make us all a bit poorer. Does he get paid like Al Bore to go around preaching his messages of doom!
Posted by alph, 3/03/2010 9:57:35 AM
Does he actually get paid to go around the world preaching doom and gloom? Or maybe he has shares in the oil industry and trying to talk up the price of fuel. Maybe he should just stay in his own country and worry them.
Posted by trexdex, 3/03/2010 10:30:54 AM
We should be improving our rail systems, including options to go to electric ready for when the oil runs dry.
Posted by T.Rain, 3/03/2010 10:38:49 AM
Mr Tamminen should stay in California with most of the world's other lunatics, maybe Arnie and the rest believe him, I think he's so full of it.
Posted by bill, 3/03/2010 9:03:57 PM
Dera A. Lizard, that's because America uses most of the oil from these oilfields.
Posted by Wally, 4/03/2010 7:12:32 AM
A gallon of petrol in Australia is 4.54L - we used an Imperial gallon and not the US gallon.
Posted by Steve, 4/03/2010 9:26:07 AM
Gee wiz, a visiting emmissary from 'Bull$hitistan' shows us the dearth of his feeble intellect. One could apply the same logic to any other core commodity or input and arrive at similar numbers. Why not allocate all those costs to the price of urban water? And surprise, surprise, the so-called 'real' price of water would sky rocket. Why not allocate all those costs to calorific intake? And surprise, surprise, the so-called 'real' price of food would go through the roof and half the planet would starve to death. But when we apportion all these externalities to all of the full range of inputs to all of our value chains we get prices that approximate what we have today. The fact that this clown was a senior official in the soon-to-be bankrupt Californian Government just about says it all, don't you think? And what does the moron think should be done with all the additional tax revenue from a price of $3.60/litre? It would be used to subsidise all the externalities of course. The price of petrol would go up and the price of war would go down. Isn't he clever?
Posted by Ian Mott, 4/03/2010 10:01:08 AM
I think we should look in our own back yard and see how much oil we use, and don’t have. I would also like to leave some oil for my grandchildren, and any way you look at it, there will be none. Just go find the oil reserves, none in Australia for my children for a start.
Posted by dunart, 4/03/2010 10:10:04 AM
Of course, this pinko-leftie-fruitcake-expert, can show us what a fabulous economic model he has in CA - so that we can follow them, too, eh? $17B in debt, no way out, except CA people being taxed to extinction; idiocies such as making people scrap perfectly serviceable diesel engines, right now, under CARB, and then paying you up to $90,000 to have you replace your 1970s or 1980s diesel in your truck, tractor or earthmover, with a "modern" engine that produces low emissions? Oil is our way of life, it won't change for another 50 years. No doubt this clown recommends we should all convert over to bicycles and pedal-powered farm equipment, and thereby boost employment, and reduce emissions at the same time. $3.60 a litre would be a dream figure if this idiot was left in charge for too long. It would be more like $15 a litre, and our economy would look like one of the 3rd world economies, as we mined minerals with a pick and shovel. Oil is NOT the be-all and end-all, clean hydrocarbon fuels can be sourced from many sources, including the gas reserves that we have, that are capable of sustaining the entire world for 250 years. Send this clown back to the loony bin he came from.
Posted by Ron N, 4/03/2010 11:48:39 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Terry Tamminen ... pay the price. Photo: Brendan Esposito
Terry Tamminen ... pay the price. Photo: Brendan Esposito
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: What do you think the outlook for your commodity will be this year?

Highly positive
(6.1%)

Positive
(24%)

Neutral
(34.5%)

Negative
(23.3%)

Highly negative
(12.1%)

Total Votes: 429
Poll Date: 28 February, 2010
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...