News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Climate change to hit harder and faster 

Climate change to hit harder and faster

26 Jun, 2008 04:14 PM
Climate change is occurring faster than forecast, and will hit Australian agriculture harder than expected.

That's the sobering news delivered by CSIRO at a special forum in Sydney today, when it outlined its latest research on the risks that climate change poses to agriculture, and potential adaptation strategies, at a special forum hosted by the Australian Council of Agricultural Journalists.

Dr Mark Howden, whose research has focused on climate change adaptation, said carbon dioxide emissions, global temperature rises and sea level rises are meeting - or exceeding - the worst-case scenarios plotted by the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change in the 1990s.

While it remains an open question as to whether the climatic changes being experienced in Australia—such as the declining rainfall across the continent's lower half—can be atttributed to global warming, Dr Howden said the fact remains that many of the changes being recorded around the globe are consistent with the modelling of the potential effects of global warming.

In its latest research, CSIRO decided to move away from largely meaningless forecasts of temperature rises, and look at the risks to various forms of agriculture in different climatic regions.

"Agricultural industries that depend on irrigation water but which produce a relatively low-value product, like rice and dairy, are pretty vulnerable," Dr Howden said.

"There's also a fair degree of vulnerability for cereal cropping in marginal areas—that's only going to get more marginal."

Across the southern regions, Dr Howden forecast the possibility that less reliable rainfall would see more emphasis on livestock production, with cropping seen more as an opportunity enterprise rather than an annual certainty.

Coastal horticultural crops in the north, and sugar, are likely to be exposed to a greater risk of damage from storms, cyclones and even sea level rise.

The good news, Dr Howden said, is that Australian agriculture is already used to coping with adversity and climate risk; and that the nation has a strong underlying research base.

The bad news is that Australia has been politically slow to accept the threat of climate change, "putting us a decade behind where we could be".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Scientists Playing God again. I would rather play the emperor's new clothes game. Have the fools of this nation lost all touch with reality.
Posted by Richie10, 27/06/2008 1:41:27 AM
The leader of those people Dr Howden is referring to as "politically-slow to accept climate change" - who have put Australian agriculture "a decade behind where we should be" - got an Order of Australia last week for services to the nation. Former PM John Howard and every cabinet minister who served during his 11 years in office are those people. The remnants of this group are still at it this week in Parliament, trying to derail the Emissions Trading Scheme. And yesterday, during a special Congressional hearing in Washington, 17 national security organisations testified that in their assessment there would be millions of people displaced from nations to our north due to flooding and crop failures before 2030. Their governments will not be able to help them. The Australian Federal Police, the Australian Defence Forces and the US Military all released similar predictions in 2007. (Google them to see. Or go to carboncoalitionoz.blogspot.com). By suppressing scientific reports (and in some cases changing them) and promoting the views of 'scientists' who previously defended tobacco and asbestos interests, the political administrations and supporters of John Howard and George W. Bush delayed the entry of the largest emitter (USA) and the largest emitter per head (Australia) into Kyoto, giving China and India the excuse they needed not to enter. They and companies like Exxon Mobil and our local "Greenhouse Mafia" should be remembered for their contribution to our security should the projections of CSIRO scientists (previously supressed by John Howard's administration as those of the US Environmental Protection Agency and NASA were doctored by the Bush Administration) prove to be correct. (For verification of these facts, you can read the books "Scorcher" by Clive Hamilton and "High & Dry" by Guy Peace, a former Liberal party ministerial adviser.)
Posted by Michael Kiely, 27/06/2008 8:32:48 AM
Oleg Sorokhtin,a fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Science as well as staff researcher of the Oceanology Institute says stock up on fur coats and felt boots because earth is at the peak of its passing warm spell. The real reason for climate change are uneven solar radiation, terresttial precession, as well as solar activity and luminosity. We are in for a fairly cold spell when solar activity reaches it's minimum by 2041 and will last 50 to 60 years. There are around 3,000 sensor buoys free floating the World's Oceans and in the past five years they have recorded a 0.4 Celsius drop in temperature of the oceans. Global warming is coming all right in about 29,000 years and 100,000 years from now we will have another great ice age.Just like when you move your hand closer to the fire it gets warmer, move Earth a couple million miles closer to the sun and it gets warmer. Increase the tilt of the axis towards the sun and southern hemispheres get cooler and Northern warmer. So look to some real scientists for a change, won't you?"
Posted by jamie, 27/06/2008 9:13:08 AM
The information in Jamie's posting is so wrong. If you research this from real science sources like NASA and NOAA, CSIRO you will have discovered as did I that the data on solar flux has showed a clear departure from the global temperature trends. The data shows that with the current solar influence on the earth's temperature it should have been cooling for the last decade but the climate data shows very clear global warming trends. The ocean temperature changes you refer to is only a part of a complex system and the readings are actually predicted as part of the climate change modelling - actually forming part of the evidence the greenhouse induced climate change is with us already (you need to look at the whole picture in a complex ocean and atmospheric system not take one convenient data set out of context - clearly you are a lay person not a scientist). And note the term is importantly climate change, not "global warming". You are correct for past history, where there has been clearly an association between solar flux and global temperatures (eg ice ages), but now that greenhouse gas levels in the atmosphere are at unprecedented high levels due to man's industrial activities - the association with solar flux has been supplemented by greenhouse as drivers of global atmospheric temperatures, changing the entire dynamics. There are now emerging clear and undeniable rising trends in global temperatures, clear changes to rainfall patterns, increased storm severity. Recent work by our premier science organisation the CSIRO is showing these symptoms of global warming (weather observations) are happening at a much faster rate and to the severist worst case scenario of the IPCC forecasts. Do not doubt the credible work of the real science community. Climate change is real - it is due to man's industrial activities producing much elevated CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. No other reason.... Deny it at your peril, my friend...
Posted by Wessa, 27/06/2008 11:29:49 AM
With the CSIRO if they don't tow the line, they will be using the touch screens at Centrelink. CSIRO has already had offices closed. Their main function appears now to back Climate Change hysteria.
Posted by Len , 27/06/2008 1:43:50 PM
Do you think Oleg Sorokhtin's opinions might be affected by his funding coming from oil and gas interests in Russia? Oleg is a geophysicist specialising in oil and gas exploration... somehow I don't think that is climatology! As a horticulturalist who has actually noticed the changes... I'd prefer to listen to the scientific logic of CSIRO rather than a soothsayer of sciences in which they have never worked in. No wonder we're all stuffed when people still think nothing is happening. I feel sorry for my children and their children to come!
Posted by claudia, 27/06/2008 2:07:56 PM
Agriculturalists have had our government's protection too long. So much environmental damage, such as deforestation, killing off of biodiversity and pollution, has been done by them! Abusive farming practices are partly the cause of climate change/drought. We need to invest in more sustainable agricultural alternatives to dairy, cattle, cotton and rice.
Posted by Milly, 27/06/2008 3:02:45 PM
Editor: Perhaps farmers should stop growing food altogether, Milly. Then you will be happy - until your tummy starts rumbling. It's time for people like you to get a grip on reality.


Posted by VERNON GRAHAM on 27/06/2008 3:08:04 PM
"The situation is real bad, give us more money". What a load of rubbish this is, both satellite and surface temps indicate there has been no, repeat no, warming in the Southern Hemisphere at all and what warming occurred in the NH has stopped and almost reversed since 1998. The statement that the seas are rising quickly is a deliberate lie! The AUSAID sponsored project to measure sea level rises in the Pacific was abandoned because the measured sea level rises were only of the order of 1-2mm/year. In other words it will take about 500-1000 years to rise by 1 metre. This is about 10 times slower than we know has happened in the very recent past but which had nothing to do with humans! But in any case tectonic plate movement renders this tiny amount of rise in sea levels completely irrelevant. As for cyclones well there have been less than there ever has in the last 100 years.


Posted by Iced Volvo, 27/06/2008 5:21:20 PM
Once upon a time we had a non partisan public service which employed many dedicated, intelligent and well educated people. We also had a marvellous CSIRO, which kept Australian science and industry up with the best in the world. Then along came the Whitlam and Wran governments, which sacked the wise men in the public service who urged prudence, and also lowered the standards in our education system. The Hawke government in its turn appointed Neville Wran to head the CSIRO. They put their own "political scientists" in charge of the real scientists. What we are seeing today is the product of that policy. The modern CSIRO is badly tainted.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 28/06/2008 9:21:51 AM
CSIRO say it is still an open question whether global warming has anything to do with the present dry conditions. Temperatures have risen .7% since 1950 and have not risen at all in the last ten years. Can someone please expose this hypnotic spin spewing from the mouths of so many agenda pushers? They were trying to tell us the world was flat 600 years ago and haven't learnt much since.
Posted by bobby, 28/06/2008 7:53:44 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: What should the Federal Government do to relieve the cost of petrol?

Continue with its current approach
(4.2%)

Cut petrol excise by 5c/l
(1.6%)

Cut petrol excise by 10c/l
(29.9%)

Invest petrol revenue in alternative fuel research
(39%)

Mandate 10pc biofuel content in petrol
(13.3%)

Other
(11.9%)

Total Votes: 428
Poll Date: 23 June, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...