News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 It's time to spend, spend, spend: Rudd 

It's time to spend, spend, spend: Rudd

08 Dec, 2008 12:23 PM
As Kevin Rudd urged pensioners and families to "go out and spend" the Christmas bonus being paid into their bank accounts, it has emerged the recession-busting package will cost taxpayers $28 million in advertising and administration costs.

From today, low and middle income families eligible for the family tax benefit will receive a one-off payment of $1000 a child, single age pensioners will gain $1400 and pensioner couples will get $2100.

Those receiving the carers allowance will be given $1000 for each person being cared for.

Retailers are hoping to grab their share of the $10.4 billion being poured into the economy amid fears that cautious consumers could mean a sluggish Christmas trading period.

Myer department sores launched a campaign directly targeting the Government's largesse by reworking part of the Twelve Days of Christmas jingle to the slogan "my true Rudd gave to me".

A Liberal senator, Guy Barnett, has raised questions about the cost of delivering the package, with $17.2 million being spent on administration costs and $11.55 million for public education campaigns.

"How many public servants does it take to press a button?" Senator Barnett asked.

"How is it possible that it would cost so many millions of dollars to make these payments, which are being made via established administrative processes and electronic transfer?

"The $17.2 million cost could instead allow another 17,200 families to benefit from this money, or 12,285 single pensioners."

Senator Barnett also questioned why the Government needed an advertising campaign when it had promised to curb ad spending.

A spokeswoman for the Families Minister, Jenny Macklin, said the $17.2 million was for "costs incurred by Centrelink to deliver the payments" and $5.12 million would be spent on radio and print advertisements, brochures and routine correspondence to make sure people understand the "eligibility, timing and the context of the payments".

In line with the Government's new advertising rules, the Auditor-General has approved the spending.

"For the 6 million recipients, it is important to know this payment is not a mistake or overpayment but an extra lump sum payment," the spokeswoman said.

The Minister for Human Services, Joe Ludwig, said some payments might not arrive until December 19 and urged people concerned about not receiving money to wait until then before contacting Centrelink.

He said people did not need to apply for the payments.

Speaking in Geelong yesterday, Mr Rudd urged families and pensioners to spend the money to strengthen the economy.

"These payments start arriving tomorrow, just 17 days before Christmas, and I urge families and pensioners who have been doing it tough to spend their payments in a responsible way to make their family Christmas all the more special," he said.

Who gets what - and when

  • Payments worth $1.8 billion start flowing to families, pensioners and carers from today.
  • More than 410,000 families who receive Family Tax Benefit A will receive $1000 for each eligible child. 810,000 children in all.
  • $1 billion will go to more than 725,000 Victorian age pensioners, carers and people with a disability.
  • Single pensioners will get $1400 and pensioner couples $2100. Those who receive the carers allowance will also get $1000 for each eligible person cared for.
  • Most payments will be made in the next fortnight and will arrive in bank accounts automatically.
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I personally think that it would have been much more responsible of the Government if it had increased the pensions by $50 pr fortnight to pay off bills and buy food instead of asking them to just go out and waste it on anything that takes their fancy. I don't begrudge them the extra money, because they can use it, just the way it has been delivered. Sharon.
Posted by Shazza, 8/12/2008 7:43:14 PM
This is pork barrelling pure and simple. To the Labor party: let's not have any rubbish about the coalition spending money in marginal rural seats and getting abused for it. It's the only time those seats will get any money they're entitled to...
Posted by mbh, 9/12/2008 6:38:36 AM
Why am I surprised that hard working, now retired and fully self-funded Australians are again ignored. We pay full price for everything and are fully ignored by governments. Where is the revolution!
Posted by denis, 9/12/2008 3:58:20 PM
Pensioners will be frugal in the way they spend Rudd's handout. After all they are well trained after years of just existing on the pension. This is their chance to reduce their mortgage and pay off debts. Not a good idea to buy electrical appliances with warnings of massive increases in electricity costs with Rudd's global warming.
Posted by richo, 9/12/2008 6:26:38 PM
Why discriminate? why target those people who ALWAYS get the handout? What about the rest of us who forever support this country through our income tax?

I understand and support the welfare system. But this one off payment is not about welfare. It's about boosting the economy. I can spend a grand as well as anyone else can.

Posted by John of Tas, 10/12/2008 7:16:57 AM
In my opinion if the Rudd government really wanted to boost spending would it not have been more practical to have those eligible for the bonus apply at the retailer that they so desired to spend the money, or a portion of it at who would then apply on their behalf, take the money straight from the government and if it's not spent, too bad. This way the retailers could advertise the availibility of the grant and more could have benefitted from it. Sure the retailers lose a little of what's being handed out but would be guaranteed a much larger portion of it than what they'll get when it's left to the pensioner as to whether or not to hold on to the money or settle debt with it. My two cents anyway, I'm sure some will disagree.
Posted by Benn, 10/12/2008 3:53:39 PM
So... here we go again excluding students, who are a critical asset to the future of this country and the rest of the world! It's time our Government gave both students who currently receive benefits as well as... students who have to support ourselves through higher education... FOR THE FUTURE OF THIS COUNTRY!!! I completely agree with Denis and John, your contributions and many others contributions to this country are virtually ignored... you have to support yourselves as well as... the rest of Australia!!! Now us students who are working our butts off... so we can be ready to support the future of Australia and now... we are being ignored!!! Rudd... start supporting everyone... STOP DISCRIMINATING... WHICH IS WHAT YOU ARE CURRENTLY DOING!!!
Posted by Erin, 11/12/2008 12:57:55 PM
Let's not forget that the only reason this money is available to be distributed is due to the good economic management of the previous Liberal Government. I do understand that there are unusual circumstances with the global economy this time around, but once again Labor seems to have found a quick method of wasting the gains made by the financially astute Liberals over the past years. If the usual Labor strategy follows, we will be in deficit within the next 3 years and then we will have to bring Liberal back in to tidy the finances again.
Posted by bc, 13/12/2008 6:25:53 PM
The money was not necessary. It was only to make him look good so his fans will keep him number one. The wrong people got the money. Looking at the shopping trolleys full of useless toys (many will be discarded after christmas) the other day in a regional shopping centre. Single parents and dole bludgers should not be rewarded for producing. They should be discouraged to the highest degree. I am very worried about Mr Rudd's spending. He will rapidly undo all Mr Howard's good work.
Posted by High Country Gent, 16/12/2008 7:35:41 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should the Nationals split from the Coalition?

Yes
(48.8%)

No
(47%)

Undecided
(4.1%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 07 December, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...