News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 'Wasteful irrigators' perception adds pressure to farmers 

'Wasteful irrigators' perception adds pressure to farmers

24 Oct, 2008 04:45 PM
The perception in city areas that irrigators are wasting their water is bearing down on farmers who are finding it hard enough to cope because they have run out of it.

Queensland farmer, Peter Kenny, who chaired a committee looking into the social impacts of drought, told a forum in Canberra yesterday that farmers were hurting because of the "disconnect" between themselves and city people, who did not understand that they were actually producing food, not wasting water, he said.

Mr Kenny released his report to the Government yesterday calling for a national commitment to rural people and communities, which would be a platform for future support from Australians for those areas and people outside the big cities.

Mr Kenny said the mental anguish and pressure felt by farmers trying to defend their livelihoods during the drought was considerable.

"When we went to Griffith we had a number of people there who, for the first time in their lives, had run out of water," Mr Kenny said.

"That was hard enough for them to put up with this because their land was valueless because they had no water.

"They can put up with that to a certain degree.

"But the thing that really hurts them is that wherever they read in the media about wasting water growing rice and wasting water irrigating, that's the thing that really hurts them."

Mr Kenny said these farmers had a job to do – producing food and growing crops for the nation.

"They really believe that when people in the cities hear about us as irrigators using water, that we're branded as water wasters," he said.

"We've got to change that around."

Mr Kenny said the irrigation practices put in place in the past 10 to 15 years in irrigation were unbelievable.

"We don't talk about however many tonnes per acre as we used to. We talk about how much production per litre of water.

"We know that we can't waste this particular resource, but when we get these pressures against us that say we're wasting water it adds to the psyche of the humanity and we just believe we are being trodden on."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It's ironic that as farming/grazing practices have improved over the last decade less water has found its way to the river systems because of it. Better grazing and cropping techniques have stopped runoff adding to inflow reductions. So who is to blame for the lack of water in the river systems? Must be Kevin!
Posted by Dave, 25/10/2008 7:30:36 AM
It never ceases to amaze me when I visit the cities at the wasted water flushing toilets, running to waste from baths and spas in the huge hotels and other complexes. Have there been any restrictions placed on using spas and baths? A short shower is just as good. Mind you when in the city most of the population are not aware of the drought or the water crisis in the country. Do they really want to know? It is not affecting them so why worry? Comments such as no one asked you to be a farmer really are hard to swallow.
Posted by farmers wife, 27/10/2008 6:47:16 AM
Had an interesting conversation with a very good mate in the city a while ago. He said to me "...Why don't they just grow cotton somewhere where it rains...?" I (politely as possible) pointed out to him that growing cotton, like so many crops, requires water, but rain causes pest and disease problems that make his well-meant suggestion unworkable. He, a reasonably worldy professional person, admitted had no idea of the practicalities of cropping. His innocent impractical musing is symptomatic of the misinformation spread and the massive lack of understanding of the science applicable to the task of feeding the city dwellers, most of whom do not actually want to know how their food is produced, as Peter Kenny correctly observes. Governments and their agencies who have told city people to "dob in" anyone watering their garden and which have "water watch" Gestapo running around in cars looking for anyone running a hose have a lot to answer for in this nonsensical misperception regarding irrigation. I have a polite suggestion for the submissive unquestioning water worriers - wake up while we on the land still can be bothered feeding you !!
Posted by AJ, 27/10/2008 8:57:51 AM
It's a bit of a generalisation to say irrigators are actually producing food - have you tried eating any cotton lately? Irrigators need to realise that the water they are taking from the inland river system is killing the ecosystem and balance of the Rivers, and if they don't start thinking about the long-term consequences for all communities on the rivers, there will be no viable river system for anyone in this country.
Posted by balance, 27/10/2008 9:38:42 AM
Editor's note: Nearly all irrigation crops are for human food consumption. And even though cotton is primarily used for fibre, cotton seed oil is consumed by humans, while cotton seed is also used as a cattle feed, again making the crop part of the human food chain. It's also worth noting that there has been comparitively very little cotton grown in Australia in recent years due to the drought.
Posted by Michael Thomson on 27/10/2008 10:36:52 AM
Whether you irrigators are wasting water or not, you are using too much water. The river system cannot cope with the present demands. Every civilisation that overdeveloped its irrigation has collapsed. And Australia has overdeveloped in a very short space of time. Not all of this irrigation is producing food. A hell of a lot of water has gone into producing cotton, and presently that diversion is stopping other irrigators from producing food, as well as destroying the rivers and wetlands.
Posted by Barney, 27/10/2008 9:46:25 AM
Take a drive through the Sunrasia and other areas on a stinking hot day with a howling wind blowing and have a look at the efficient overhead sprays operating. We need to irrigate but it can be done far more efficently.
Posted by Richard Woolley, 27/10/2008 10:57:08 AM
What goes around, always comes back around. If Australians enjoy eating poison, good luck to them. Keep attacking the irrigator, instead of the people who run your country. See how far that gets you. If you beleive what the TV says about the drought, then the TV is always right, yes? Well then you are all going to get your lungs eaten by a super bug anyway, what do you need food for?!!!!!!
Posted by wrond dream, 27/10/2008 11:00:00 AM
Blindly sending more water down the river is not the answer. If wetlands are so important why aren't they national parks? If you want to regenerate a wetland you must first remove the grazing stock and create habitat for wildlife breeding grounds. Then when the water allocated to the wetlands (as it has been right through the drought unlike irrigators allocations) then the water will have the desired effect. Currently water is sent into the wetlands and used to grow stock feed! Water is used on cotton because it creates the maximum amount of revenue per meg. This revenue is then used to employ people and earn export dollars. The exact same export dollars that food does. Wake up to yourself barney.
Posted by Don, 27/10/2008 11:10:50 AM
Looks like 40% of posters so far don't know where food comes from...I guess they wouldn't be aware of river heights/conditions in 1914 either.
Posted by mick, 27/10/2008 12:08:01 PM
I take it from your comments, Barney, that if the water that was used to grow cotton (back when there was some) were used to grow wheat or grass for cattle to graze, so people could eat the produce, then all would be right in the world. Unfortunately it is this lack of fundamental knowledge that pervades the anti-farming lobby. Barney, the product does not matter. States have done plans over the last 5 years to address environmental flows. The Federal government is already addressing over-allocation by buying back entitlements where that needs to be done. All farmers & communities living in inland Australia want the same thing - a sustainable future for their businesses & communities. There are some who want to take us back to the 1950s & some that want to go forward into the 21st century. I count myself in the second group.
Posted by Trev, 27/10/2008 12:08:46 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
24 October, 2008
POLL
Q: Who will receive your first vote in the AWI board elections?

Brian van Rooyen
(19.7%)

George Falkiner
(14.1%)

Chris Abell
(3.8%)

Will Roberts
(7%)

Ken Boundy
(1.6%)

David Webster
(7.8%)

Robyn Clubb
(3.5%)

Meredith Sheil
(12.7%)

John Keniry
(5.4%)

Laurence Modiano
(24.3%)

Total Votes: 370
Poll Date: 19 October, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...