News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ABC chairman warms to the climate sceptics 

ABC chairman warms to the climate sceptics

11 Mar, 2010 06:10 AM
THE chairman of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Maurice Newman, has waded into the global warming debate again, telling some of his most senior staff that they had succumbed to ''groupthink'' in their reporting of climate change.

In what is being read by ABC staff as an attack on them, Mr Newman said the media had accepted issues at face value and had suppressed the voices of climate change sceptics.

His comments, in particular those on climate change, drew an angry response from senior journalist Jonathan Holmes.

Witnesses report that Holmes, who last week wrote about the media's role in reporting climate change on the ABC's opinion site The Drum, congratulated Mr Newman on his speech but then said that he was so angry he could barely concentrate.

It is not the first time that Mr Newman, who describes himself as a climate change agnostic, has provoked controversy. Nearly three years ago the ABC board pressured the broadcaster to show a British documentary questioning the science behind climate change.

In yesterday's speech Mr Newman said the media had failed in their reporting of the global financial crisis and of government policy.

''There were a handful of sceptics who challenged and warned of the dangerous consequences these policies presented, but the media, the consensus of experts, and the vested interests prevailed,'' he told the ABC's annual leadership conference.

His most scathing criticism was reserved for his own organisation, which had failed to let climate change deniers have their say.

''At the ABC, I believe we must re-energise the spirit of enquiry. Be dynamic and challenging, to look for contrary points of view, to ensure that the maverick voice will not be silenced.''

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Hats off to Mr. Maurice Newman. I was starting to worry it was just me!
Posted by Temporaryfarmer, 11/03/2010 5:00:52 PM
If Jonathan Holmes is so resistant to balance by the ABC perhaps he should ask why should it continue to recieve public funding. The ABC is for all Australians including climate sceptics. The organisation can only be strenghtened by balnaced analyses.
Posted by ABC loyal watcher, 12/03/2010 8:11:53 AM
Here!! Here!! Mr Newman. Don't waste your time being angry Mr Holmes - just look at yourselves and fix it. I barely listen to the ABC anymore because they are so biased towards greens, climate change, the aboriginal industry, do-gooders etc. And I am almost seventy years old and have listened to the ABC all my life. What happened to unbiased reporting?
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 12/03/2010 8:13:19 AM
What a joke - if ever there was group-think it is expressed in the notion that climate sceptics never get any air space. Hardly a day goes by without Farmonline spruiking a sceptic, but rarely the other 'side'; the Oz is dominated by sceptic feature writers and editorial; the ABC should be commended for its balance.
Posted by bruce, 12/03/2010 8:31:46 AM
The concept of 'unbiased reporting' is frequently in the ear of the listener, to adapt an expression. Unfortunately, two issues are frequently conflated in this debate. On global warming, the science is irrefutable - our planet is becoming hotter, whether we wish to believe it or not. Whether this climate change is due to human activity, or whether we can limit the change, is more debatable. We hedge our bets at our peril because one thing is certain - if we listen to the sceptics and do nothing, we stand no chance of mitigating the consequences of living in a hotter world.
Posted by paperbackwriter, 12/03/2010 9:08:10 AM
I wonder if whatever Bruce is on is available to the general public. I am having difficulty in understanding where the balance is with "The ABC". I don't fully comprehend the ABC nuances and finessing balance - perhaps they could produce a 90 minute explanatory program after each 30 minute news or current affairs programs to help us understand all the balanced reporting they do.
Posted by gordons49, 12/03/2010 9:15:00 AM
The ABC has read the writing on the wall.
Posted by Qlander, 12/03/2010 9:33:42 AM
Newman in his speech to ABC employees uses the familiar, and mistaken, argument that the media is stifling debate on climate change. Perhaps this reflects his commercial, not scientific, background. He seems not to understand that there is very intense debate about climate change in the scientific arena (available to anyone who looks, but ignored by sensationalist journos). This is real debate, based on observation and evidence, not the wild assertions of vested interests. The ABC has a good record of reporting the real debate. Newman should know better.
Posted by nico, 12/03/2010 9:49:20 AM
Well bruce -- yesterday's piece in The Australian by climate-alarmist-in-chief James Hansen must have helped withe the balance. And nico -- Monday night's Science Show was wholely devoted to interviewing alarmists not a skeptic was interviewed so you must have been happy with that 'balance' (scare quotes intended.
Posted by Andrew Kennett, 12/03/2010 11:43:29 AM
About 'bloody' time! The ABC's reporting on this was a complete switch-off. Maybe we will get some objective contributions but don't hold your breath. The ABC maybe the tax payer funded 'peoples voice' but there is some serious skewing to the political Left on just about every front as a systemic culture, even by virtue of their staff-mix history. Good luck Mr Newman, I am sure you realise you are dealing with an entrenched environment [excuse the pun]!
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 12/03/2010 11:47:03 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
10 March, 2010
09 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...