News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 ACCC challenges farm carbon trader in Federal Court 

ACCC challenges farm carbon trader in Federal Court

06 Jan, 2010 09:09 AM
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has taken legal action against carbon trader Prime Carbon in the Federal Court for making misleading representations about the National Environment Registry and the National Stock Exchange of Australia.

The competition watchdog alleges that Prime Carbon's sole director, Ken Bellamy, was knowingly part of the misleading conduct.

The Australian Financial Review reports that Prime Carbon sells a "soil enhancement and carbon sequestration program" to farmers, which aims to take carbon from the atmosphere and store it in agricultural land, and is designed to abate and offset greenhouse gas.

The ACCC says Prime Carbon falsely represented the NER as the only registry that meets Australian government standards, and that it was regulated by the government.

The company is also alleged to have represented that the NER was where domestic and international buyers go to source carbon credits, when this was not the case.

The ACCC says Prime Carbon suggested the NER had a relationship with the Chicago Environment Registry, which would assist NER-listed Australian carbon credits being traded on the international market.

Further, the regulator alleges that Prime Carbon falsely represented that it was a broker with the NSX and that carbon credits purchased through Prime Carbon have been generated through the NSX.

There will be a directions hearing in the matter on February 23.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Gee wiz, shonks in the carbon credit business, who would have guessed. So when will the ACCC take a good look at the activities of all the departmental spivs who have been in the same scam?
Posted by Ian Mott, 7/01/2010 9:14:16 AM
Ian, Why stop with the 'departmental spivs'; surely the same treatment should extend to all politicians engaged in the scam and the Prime Minister should not be overlooked; nor the behaviour of 'Running Bull!
Posted by 'Rob Roy', 7/01/2010 10:11:44 AM
It's about time.
Posted by Trix, 7/01/2010 2:48:05 PM
I agree, Rob Roy, in fact, the old bus over the cliff joke would be a very good start.
Posted by Ian Mott, 7/01/2010 3:27:05 PM
Can I sincerely ask all to consider the issue - since when does 'alleges' mean proven guilty. Food security may be a real casualty here & when you delve into the basis of the program offered you might then understand. It offers assistance to the growers of our food with real solutions to changes being introduced such as a reduction in chemical fertiliser use and 'reef protection'. The impact of Climate Change is a real issue & shouldn't innovative ideas that deal with assisting in soil improvement & water storage capacity as well as the support & encouragement of farmers to adopt differing land & management practices be applauded? Support must be given to the ability to grow food, despite ever increasing climatic changes to deal with, ie. drought!!!!! The future of our children is at stake! Good on someone for trying to implement a strategy to tackle such a large issue & scrutinisation by an authoritive process is not always a bad thing. So I would like to encourage you to please take the time to see who are the main beneficiaries of outcomes from this program and dare to look further at the details.
Posted by Teri, 7/01/2010 10:03:55 PM
Teri - as fantastic as soil carbon sequestration is (I agree with you), ALL good ideas are vulnerable to poor application! It is my own opinion that such charlatanism can only hinder the very real efforts of many landholders & others who are working towards getting a REAL trading system going - not a make believe one. Reminds me of rogue carbon traders in PNG (selling 'avoided deforestation') ... the locals call it 'sky-money' because they never see any of it.
Posted by Trix, 8/01/2010 9:59:43 AM
In the news today forestry enterprises selling carbon programs can lose $800 million of farmers' and others' money and the ACCC does not appear to be chasing them at all. Yet the ACCC chases Prime Carbon where there is no money lost! What the?
Posted by Teri, 8/01/2010 9:58:50 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
05 January, 2010
04 January, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business will turn a profit in 2010?

Definitely
(10.4%)

Probably
(16.2%)

Maybe
(17.8%)

Break even
(15.2%)

Probably make a loss
(40.4%)

Total Votes: 512
Poll Date: 04 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...