News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Acid rain or mining to blame for waterway pollution? 

Acid rain or mining to blame for waterway pollution?

21 Mar, 2009 04:00 AM
The Queensland Resources Council (QRC) has pointed to acidic rainfall as a cause of high levels of acidity and heavy metals in two creeks downstream from the Lady Annie Mine, near Mount Isa.

The QRC, which represents the interests of mining companies, has told Queensland Country Life that rainfall is as likely to be a factor as flood-related spillage from the mine itself.

Citing a chemist with extensive experience in the North West, the QRC points out rainfall is naturally acidic.

"The North West province is heavily mineralised and rainwater is naturally acidic from dissolved carbon dioxide," QRC saays.

"The natural water may already contain high metal values, or become high in metals when excess rainwater

makes the river acidic, dissolving metals.

"Only by testing water up-stream can anyone suggest elevated metals came from the mine."

EPA testing of the Inca and Saga creeks 12km downstream from the mine following flooding that caused a waste dam at the mine to overflow, revealed that water in both creeks had a pH level of 3.3. The lower the pH, the more acidic. Acid rain typically has a pH of 5.6, according to the EPA.

QRC CEO Michael Roche says media reporting of the flood-related discharges has been sensationalist, and says it isn't responsible to label the event as an environmental disaster before water quality test results are known.

"In the context of an extraordinary weather event and the State election campaign, such commentary was clearly designed to promote a political viewpoint rather than a rational assessment of environmental harm," he says.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
this needs more explaning.
Posted by liv, 21/03/2009 6:22:32 PM
Acid rain? Whose leg do they think they are pulling? Mining disturbs the subsoil, exposing unleached soils to the elements. Even more than housing construction in western Sydney, mining pollutes waterways.
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 22/03/2009 9:21:15 PM
Alice in Wonderland might be to blame too! What a joke. How can the QRC ever again be taken seriously? I wonder if this had happened in the Brisbane River what would be the reaction? No doubt the EPA will come out and confirm the acid rain culprit. I'm disgusted.
Posted by Whopper, 23/03/2009 7:58:15 AM
You have to be kidding. How can the QRC actually try and defend this? Why not own up to it and see it does not happen again? My God people, is your superannuation and shares portfolio ever going to be enough? You can get the money and live inside and watch reruns of the nature channel on your plasma because it will be too dangerous to go outside!
Posted by the lorax, 23/03/2009 9:40:52 AM
Sounds feasible when written by the QRC like this, however there appears to be some loopholes in what was said. Firstly pH is a log scale and so each increment is 10 times higher. Therefore the increase in acidity (decrease in pH) described in the article is over 20 times that of normal - that is a big jump. Acid in rain is normal but the acid generated from CO2 leads to minimal change. Even with excessive CO2 in the atmosphere - that described by very radical climate change predictors is unlikely to be over 20 times increase in acid in the rain. So there must be another contaminant. The acid rain term was always noted from air pollution from excess sulfur and other contaminants released into the air. If that is the cause of the acid, it sounds like the QRC is suggesting that the acid incident monitored isn't the accidental pollution of water from acid mine drainage leakage, it is actually only the accidentally polluted air by excessive air pollution. Without any other industrial or volcanic source of the necessary contaminants for thousands of kilometres, I guess QRC decided which mistake is worse - land and water pollution or air pollution. Air pollution obvisously isn't so bad.
Posted by Knx Kid, 23/03/2009 3:37:15 PM
Acid rain? Pull the other one, it plays Jingle Bells! The EPA's statement that acid rain typically has a pH of 5.6 is true. Acid rain is not typical in the north nor in any other part of Australia. Rainfall is rarely below 6.9 in most areas and can be up to 7.2. At a pH of 5.6, acid rain will degrade the surface of concrete, sandstone and marble for example, over a generation or two. Creek water with a pH of 3.3 would be devastating to the environment. Vegetation of all kinds will have extreme difficulty surviving, most plants will die. Few seeds in the soil will survive unless covered by highly alkaline soil. If there is much aluminium in the soil, it will dissolve into the water and further kill plants. There is a possibility that the soil will need a lot of remedial treatment with lime for years to recover. No way was this acid rain and the idiot who made this press statement needs sacking because he/she has no concept of basic chemistry and this ignorance has no place in an industry relying on an up-to-date knowledge of chemistry.
Posted by Trugger, 23/03/2009 7:46:18 PM
What a load of garbage!!! I have been involved in stream flow and water quality sampling throughout Qld for the past 25 years and there is nothing to suggest the rainfall would cause this sort of issue.
Posted by Waterman, 24/03/2009 9:54:16 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
A polluted waterway near Mt Isa.
A polluted waterway near Mt Isa.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
19 March, 2009
20 March, 2009
POLL
Q: If a federal election were held on Saturday, which party would you vote for?

Labor
(16.8%)

Liberal
(40.5%)

Nationals
(25%)

Greens
(8.6%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(5.9%)

Other
(1.8%)

Total Votes: 1043
Poll Date: 15 March, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...