News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Battle plans drawn for plague locust threat 

Battle plans drawn for plague locust threat

04 Aug, 2008 11:12 AM
Predictions of a potential plague locust outbreak this Spring in northern Victoria and southern NSW have Commonwealth and State government agencies planning control activities long before the first locust egg hatches.

Surveys completed in late autumn by staff of the Rural Lands Protection Boards and Department of Primary industries in New South Wales, Department of Primary Industries in Victoria and the Australian Plague Locust Commission (APLC) have identified significant adult locust activity in areas of the NSW Riverina and Central Northern Victoria throughout April.

APLC director, Chris Adriaansen, said the survey results along with reports from landholders, indicate that locust egg laying has taken place across the area.

"The result could be a significant hatching of plague locusts in October and early November which could add another threat to crops and pastures that have just survived on limited rainfall in these areas," Mr Adriaansen said.

The APLC is working closely with the NSW and Victorian departments of primary industries to plan effective control activities across the two states.

Representatives from the three agencies met this week to discuss a coordinated action plan to combat the hatchings.

The cross-border plague locust outbreak response could see the three agencies simultaneously involved in aerial surveillance, coordination of ground-based control and aerial application of locust control agents.

Despite the planning being undertaken by the government agencies, individual landholders also have an important role in responding to the locust threat.

Graeme Eggleston of NSW DPI said the most successful response to plague locust outbreaks starts with landholder action.

"For our agencies to effectively plan for and respond to this threat, landholders need to do on-the-ground locust control and report any locust egg laying activity," he said.

The APLC will be holding its regular pre-season operational planning meeting in September in the Southern Riverina.

APLC and the state agencies have also scheduled meetings with relevant environmental agencies to ensure that dealing with the locust threat also addresses the need for protection of environmentally-sensitive areas.

Habitat areas of endangered birds and mammals are being mapped so that extensive use can be made of the Metarhizium fungus, a biological control agent which specifically affects locust species.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
if the fungus is specific to locusts - Why is the habitat of birds & mammals relevant?????????? Is this an unneccessary expense to keep ignorant uninformed politically so called 'correct' citizens at bay????
Posted by teresa green, 5/08/2008 9:58:34 AM
Locusts would normally be sprayed with chemicals that can affect particular birds and mammals. Thus to ensure there is NO risk to these species the fungus is the best option.
Posted by Jasper, 5/08/2008 10:37:55 AM
I've gone through 2 plagues on my farm and several of the chemicals used on the locusts are EXTREMELY toxic to aquatic invertebrates and bees. Since mammals and birds are higher up the food chain of invertebrates and bees (bees pollinating mammalian/bird food sources, birds eating invertebrates), the mapping of these areas vs. locust nest locations is fairly critical.

It's really important that landholders report egg laying sites. It's not a "Big Brother" thing as locusts are not selective in egg laying (except preferring to lay on north facing slopes). By reporting egg laying activity, your RLPB can calculate how much chemical to order to cover the district. Last time not enough landowners reported it, so not enough Feniothiron and fungal chemicals were ordered, consequently a lot of farmers missed out with spraying programs (there is only a 2 week window with locusts when they are at the hopper stage), and the districts subsequently got wiped out. Again locusts are not discriminatory and if Farmer A reports and Farmer B doesn't, yet Farmer B has an outbreak sooner on their property, takes all the chemical rightly belonging to Farmer A, then Farmer A misses out.......see the problem?

Posted by sprite, 5/08/2008 5:57:33 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
04 August, 2008
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 03 August, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...