News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Be cruel to be kind to red gums, say foresters 

Be cruel to be kind to red gums, say foresters

21 Dec, 2009 07:07 AM
IT IS necessary to destroy parts of the Murray River red gum forest in order to save it, says the state's timber industry.

The argument is based on the idea that fewer trees will be better able to share the river's dwindling water supply.

"If you lock these forests up and you don't get enough water to the trees, even more trees are going to die than if they were properly managed through a forestry plan," said Ron Wilson from the Institute of Foresters of Australia. "The best way to manage those forests is to have a management system so you can harvest the trees that are going to die to protect the other trees in the forest.''

Mr Wilson said stopping logging in the forests would also leave the red gums open to destruction from bushfires.

"If these trees die through lack of water and there's no harvesting to remove them, they will sit there as a huge fuel load, which has great potential to combust from lightning strikes."

The NSW Premier, Kristina Keneally, is reviewing the creation of a 42,000-hectare national park near Deniliquin in the state's south-west, announced by her predecessor Nathan Rees just hours before he was replaced on December 3. There would still be a national park but its ''shape and form'' would be reviewed alongside concerns about the park's effect on forestry jobs, she said.

Environment groups say the idea that logging prevents damage to the forest is ludicrous, pointing to several studies that contradict the industry's view.

"The added stress of industrial logging on top of existing water stress poses significant problems for this area,'' said a Wilderness Society spokesman, Peter Cooper. ''The first step is to remove that logging to ensure this stress is removed so that biodiversity in the forest can be maintained."

Plans to increase logging in high-conservation areas of forests are being challenged in the Land and Environment Court by Red Gum Forest Action, a conservation group.

A spokesman for the group, Andrew Cox, said it was challenging the legality of logging along the Murray and Murrumbidgee rivers on the basis that it has not received approval under Part 3A of the NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The group will argue that Forests NSW is breaching the law by logging globally important wetlands. "They had been until now avoiding the Millewa area, but now they are actively talking about opening up new logging in areas of high conservation value which would totally pre-empt any national park there," Mr Cox said.

"It's effectively a backflip from what the State Government said previously, which means that environment groups will have to resort to the law again to protect these forests."

Mr Cox said the sawmills were going to go out of business with or without the national park because they were harvesting timber at unsustainable rates.

But the seven small-mill owners in the district say they work sustainably, and the $48 million ''transitional'' package announced by Mr Rees would not offset the economic damage of closing down. "It's not about the money. This is our life," said Chris Crump, who has run a nine-person mill in the Murray River town of Mathoura all his working life.

Thinning of trees recommended

A FINAL report on the red gum forests of south-western NSW, to be released today, will find there is simply not enough water flowing down the Murray to keep them alive without major change.

The Natural Resources Commission has completed its exhaustive study into the health of the forests. It is expected to endorse the establishment of a giant national park along the river near Deniliquin, which was announced by the former Premier Nathan Rees on the day he was replaced by Kristina Keneally.

It is also understood to support a continuation of logging and thinning of trees in some parts of the forest. It will outline recommendations for the timber industry in the region, and suggest that logging should continue in some areas of state forest.

The idea that thinning out trees to allow some mature trees a larger share of the remaining water supplies has scientific merit in some cases, according to some research referenced in an interim version of the report.

The commission study examined long-term water management problems, including high levels of irrigation upstream, that have contributed to the slow death of the forest. The red gum forests evolved to rely on periodic flooding from the Murray.

- Ben Cubby

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We had an interesting example of this. In 2000 on our place after a wet winter, we had a mass germination of red gums which we fenced off for protection. This is in an 18inch rainfall area where it only floods very occasionally. After a few dry summers, the seedlings started to die off around the mature trees, and now there is a definite line (I call it the "treemarkation "line) where the seedlings start, which are 6m high now and look wonderful. This line is 25metres-give or take 1 metre- from the base of the big mature paddock trees, which starved the encroaching seedlings to death. Which would establish that in a dryland setting, the required living space for a big red gum is 2000 squ metres, or 5 trees to the hectare. Which makes you wonder when some of these timber companies reckon they are going to plant trees at the rate of 2000 to the ha in the same area. I stress that these trees never had any access to permanent water, I'm only pointing out that if you don't thin the trees out they'll do it for themselves anyway.
Posted by Will, 21/12/2009 8:01:46 AM
Will is right. For a forest to survive, there are only limited resources for the life of trees in a given hectare whether it be nutrients or availability of water. Around every mature tree is a "Suppression Zone" in which seedlings will not thrive. If there is water stress, the seedlings will die because the mature tree has a huge feeder root system. This suppression zone varies in size from place to place depending on nutrients and water availability. If you plant a new forest on bare ground, the usual technique is to determine the final population of the forest you can sustain before planting. Then you plant four times this number. Natural attrition and actively doing two thinnings to remove the trees with the worst form and vigor as the trees grow will ensure you have a sustainable forest. If you have a standing native forest you want to manage sustainably, the recognized principle is to thin out the trees with the worst form and vigor to a population density that will be sustainable. Cross pollination of the remaining trees will produce tree seedlings with better genetics. Leaving these seedlings and managing them in the same fashion will ensure sustainable production.
Posted by Trugger, 21/12/2009 9:39:28 AM
Thanks for that Trugger. We have a serious problem in this country in relation to reveg. The official line is to save old growth at any cost, and as a consequence there are lots of old trees but very few new ones. And the old ones are dying. I tell my son, "If you want your grandson to stand under a 100 year old tree in 100 years time, you have to plant one today. Or at least let one come up. "
Posted by Will, 21/12/2009 11:07:10 PM
Just cut them all down - we can import as much timber from overseas if we like!
Posted by tigerdicky, 22/12/2009 12:07:26 PM
Now now Tiger, you're not stirring the pot AGAIN are you ?
Posted by Will, 22/12/2009 11:05:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 December, 2009
17 December, 2009
18 December, 2009
POLL
Q: What will be the centre piece of your Christmas feast?

Beef
(9.4%)

Lamb
(8%)

Ham
(26.2%)

Turkey
(20.8%)

Seafood
(18.1%)

Vegetarian
(7.8%)

Other
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 562
Poll Date: 18 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...