News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Biodiesel tests show CO2 reduction 

Biodiesel tests show CO2 reduction

30 Mar, 2009 10:53 AM
The United States National Biodiesel Board has released the results of a lifecycle carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction demonstration.

The six-month demonstration culminated in a report showing California-based fleet States Logistics' CO2 reduction of 72.9 tons compared to straight petroleum diesel.

Eventually, this quantified data may be used to sell carbon offsets on the voluntary markets, but today they clearly show States Logistics' efforts towards reducing CO2 and other pollutants.

States Logistics ran seven trucks: four on soy-based B5 (5pc biodiesel and 95pc petroleum diesel) and three on B99 (99pc biodiesel and 1pc petroleum diesel).

The B99 trucks (three-axle International model 8600) ran 48,198 miles and consumed 8,770 gallons over the six-month period.

The equivalent straight petroleum diesel output would have been 89.9 tons, but with B99, the output was 19.8 tons for a savings of 70.1 tons.

The B5 fleet (two-axle flat bed) traveled 61,433 miles and consumed 7,090 gallons of B5.

Equivalent petroleum CO2 output would have been 71.4, but with B5 the output was reduced to 68.6 for 2.8 tons of CO2 reduction.

In addition to CO2 reduction, an estimated 119 pounds of particulate matter were eliminated from the exhaust during the six-month period.

Carbon monoxide (CO) was reduced by over 500 pounds, hydrocarbons (HC) by over 50 pounds, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) by close to 40 pounds.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm trying to do the sums on the reductions in CO2, but seem extreme. How are these results calculated. Does the CO2 production only take the fossil fuel used in the production of the biofeul into account?
Posted by Gary Farr, 30/03/2009 10:36:24 PM
The study is looking at LIFECYCLE emissions of CO2, not just the tailpipe emissions. For biodiesel, the lifecycle emissions take into account the fact that the plants (in this case, soy) take up CO2 from the atmosphere as they photosynthesise, so this part is effectively negative CO2 emissions. Another way of looking at it is that the counted greenhouse gases are 'ancient CO2' (i.e. CO2 that has not just been recycled over 1 year in the atmosphere, which doesn't add to total CO2 emissions). As the diesel CO2 has been locked up underground for millions of years it all adds to greenhouse emissions. As the soy emissions are predominantly from recycling already existing CO2 in the atmosphere then they are predominantly not counted (although 25% are counted; these are from fossil fuel inputs into making the fuel; emissions from agricultural practices; and the fact that 10% of the carbon in biodiesel comes from methanol, which is made from natural gas - a fossil fuel).
Posted by biofuel, 31/03/2009 11:15:18 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
25 March, 2009
27 March, 2009
29 March, 2009
POLL
Q: Are land clearing laws having a negative environmental impact on your property?

Yes
(67.7%)

No
(30%)

Other
(2.2%)

Total Votes: 496
Poll Date: 29 March, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...