News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Businesses will save $700m by cutting emissions: report 

Businesses will save $700m by cutting emissions: report

08 Mar, 2010 06:53 AM
CLAIMS that even small greenhouse gas targets will hurt big industry have been undermined by a government report that found basic efficiency improvements could cut national emissions and save businesses more than $700 million.

An assessment of 199 large energy users found improving efficiency could stop at least 6.4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide from being emitted - a 1.1 per cent cut in the national carbon footprint each year.

The energy savings could run 1.4 million homes for a year and give the companies an extra $736 million.

An industry group, the Energy Efficiency Council, said if the biggest companies improved efficiency by 15 per cent, national emissions would fall by nearly 5 per cent, saving billions in energy costs.

''Economic purists have been telling us that if there were $100 notes lying around, industry would have already picked them up,'' the council chief executive, Rob Murray-Leach, said. ''This report shows that companies have blind spots - sometimes you have to help them find the $100 notes.''

Though often overlooked in the policy debate, energy efficiency is widely understood to be the easiest and cheapest way to make quick emissions cuts.

The Paris-based International Energy Agency estimates that efficiency upgrades will be responsible for 65 per cent of global emissions cuts by 2020.

Mr Murray-Leach, a former adviser to the climate economist Ross Garnaut, said energy efficiency should be viewed in the same way as other business investments - you need to spend to generate a return.

''Some people say that tackling climate change is too expensive, we should wait to see what the world does first,'' he said.

'' This report shows that there is a huge amount we could do right now to cut our emissions and grow our economy.''

The government's First Opportunities report is the result of a program set up by the Howard government in 2006 that requires companies that use more than 0.5 petajoules of energy a year to find, but not necessarily implement, potential savings.

It said businesses had shown they were willing to implement the savings because of the commercial benefits.

It is an initial insight only: the report looks at 57 per cent of operations where energy savings may be possible.

The biggest savings were found to be possible in industries using large amounts of energy - metals, manufacturing and mining.

The Energy Minister, Martin Ferguson, said the report showed Australia's largest energy users had already made changes that would save them more than $500 million a year.

It had found that existing commitments by businesses would cut annual carbon dioxide emissions by nearly 4 million tonnes.

''Given that companies are still assessing their energy use, further savings will be identified,'' the report says.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is nothing more than a sop to the government stance on climate change. As far as reduction and savings to current businesses this is nothing more than evolutionary efficiency improvements that any well run business makes over time. Bad businesses just fail - those with blind spots. However this so-called saviour in efficiency will only work on the co2 issue if the economy stagnates - ie. no new business expansion. Now we know that won't happen - so let's introduce a tax and make it look like we are doing something because we have committed to a fear campaign on a theoretical model created from false data. Finally this all gets back to wanting a world tax to control people - IF all the predictions were absolutely proven beyond any doubt, then all the bad practices should be stopped immediately - not over some theoretical time to act - now that want happen - why - because it is nothing more than a fear campaign - just like "Weapons of Mass Destruction" the US and GB used to invade Iraq.
Posted by gordons, 9/03/2010 10:17:25 AM
Efficiency gains were always the most effective way to go but all the alarmist pundits like Garnaut, Stern and the IPCC itself, have never properly incorporated this constant feature of contemporary life. But one should not place excessive reliance on them and never rush them. If a perfectly good power plant is scrapped half way through its working life because of a new tax on inputs then any apparent efficiency gains by the new plant are completely extinguished by the value of the lost capital. Penny Wong should read this simple statement of fact 5 times, every day, so it will eventually sink in.
Posted by Ian Mott, 9/03/2010 10:46:01 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Should the Federal Government step in and overhaul the corporate structure of Australian Wool Innovation?

Yes
(42.4%)

No
(43.3%)

Not yet
(14.3%)

Total Votes: 413
Poll Date: 07 March, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...