News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Call for carbon tax to fight warming 

Call for carbon tax to fight warming

13 Apr, 2009 05:00 AM
VICTORIAN Governor David de Kretser has called for consideration of a carbon tax, to increase the price of goods produced using energy from high-pollution power stations.

He has also implicitly criticised the Rudd Government's planned emissions trading scheme, saying many people suggest it will "favour polluting industries and dissuade community actions to move to more renewable energy sources".

In a speech to an environmental sustainability conference at Monash University, Professor de Kretser suggested a carbon tax might be a more effective weapon in the fight against global warming, because it would drive high-polluting developing countries towards renewable energy.

Under his proposal, consumers in developed nations such as Australia would pay more for many imported goods.

"Given that the production of goods takes place in developing countries, there will be a need for the developed world to subsidise them in building more renewable sources of energy," Professor de Kretser said.

The Governor was criticised by state Liberal MP Bernie Finn last week for involving himself in what Mr Finn called the "highly contentious political issue" of global warming.

In his previously unreported Monash speech, delivered last month, Professor de Kretser said Australians needed to remember that many of the greenhouse gas emissions from countries such as China, India and Indonesia were the result of "our desire for the goods that they manufacture and sell to us".

"In effect, we have moved the factories that service our needs to their land to take the benefit of the low cost of their labour."

Professor de Kretser said Australians should recognise that the emissions caused by the personal actions of most of India's 1 billion people "can be considered as 'survival' emissions, rather than ours, which can be considered 'lifestyle' emissions".

He called on individual Australians to reduce their "environmental footprint", and on governments to legislate "to change people's lifestyle".

"Unlike war-time approaches, where people have tangible evidence of life-threatening issues, climate change is insidious and slow to demonstrate its effects," Professor de Kretser said. "We have, therefore, been slow to take up the challenge."

Professor de Kretser urged Australians to think carefully about how they spent the "economic stimulus" grants from the Federal Government.

"Should it prop up rampant consumerism that takes no note of the reality that we live on a planet with finite resources?" he said.

"Or should it be spent on building a sustainable lifestyle that emphasises the values of a society that cares for this planet, that cares for and values its biodiversity, that creates a framework where citizens respect each other, where children and adolescents are nurtured, mentored and cared for and in return who respect the older generations for their wisdom and contributions?"

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
At least he is muddying the water a bit. But am I mistaken in interpreting this as saying we should levy a carbon tax and then pay that money to countries which do not have a carbon tax because our lifestyle is better than theirs?

I make no apology for not sharing Governor de Kreter's apparent feelings of guilt.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 13/04/2009 8:52:54 AM
Should a state governor get involved in politics? If so, perhaps the NSW governor should go to Newcatle University at 1pm next Wednesday for a presentation of the other side of the global warming debate.

Speakers are David Archibald and from Hungary - Miklos Zagoni.

From a recent report: "Miklós Zágoni isn’t just a physicist and environmental researcher. He is also a global warming activist and Hungary’s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. Or was. That was until he learned the details of a new theory of the greenhouse effect, one that not only gave far more accurate climate predictions here on earth, but on Mars, too.

"The theory was developed by another Hungarian scientist, Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years of experience and a former researcher with NASA’s Langley Research Center.

"After studying it, Zágoni stopped calling global warming a crisis, and has instead focused on presenting the new theory to other climatologists." The media are also invited.

Posted by Geoff from Ourimbah, 13/04/2009 10:34:45 AM
What has the Governor of Victoria got to do with setting taxes? The people of this country pay enough in taxes with out the fresh air (sorry carbon) tax.

To suggest that the Indian polluters do it for a matter of survival is naive in the extreme. We do not need to subsidise the industries of China or India. We should concentrate our efforts in keeping Australia going through the bad times.

He should encourage the industries left in Australia including agriculture, coal steel and mining, so the country will have enough money to keep him and the Governor General of Australia going in the luxury they enjoy, thanks to the Australian tax payers.

The recent volcanic eruption in South America probably put more pollutants into the air than the whole of Australian industry did and that includes the farting cows and sheep.

I'ts time these people who are put in positions of trust by the Goverment are told to keep their big mouths shut and do what they are supposed to do and represent the Queen - not Kevin Rudd.

Posted by Woolman, 13/04/2009 8:27:08 PM
Governor David de Kretser recomendations are not political. The import tax should not to be paid to other countries but to the Australian government as any other duty. It is a tax on Australians consumption.

However, they does not mean that developing countries should charge such a tax on their domestic consumption.

Posted by terry, 13/04/2009 10:33:26 PM
Well said Ted
Posted by Ken , 19/04/2009 11:28:13 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Will the Federal Government do a better job of delivering fast broadband to the bush than private enterprise?

Yes, the Federal Government will do a better job.
(36.2%)

No, private enterprise will do a better job.
(63.8%)

Total Votes: 585
Poll Date: 09 April, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...