News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Change of mind on climate 

Change of mind on climate

11 Apr, 2009 06:07 PM
THE rise in extreme temperatures in Australia because of climate change may not be quite as big as some feared but it will still cause grave problems for human health, infrastructure, animals and plants, a study by scientists from the University of NSW finds.

The researchers tested the accuracy of climate models used by the United Nations' peak scientific body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, comparing them with actual climate observations.

When the poorly performing models were removed, the predicted rise in temperature extremes was between 2 and 3 degrees by the end of the century rather than 3 and 5 degrees as the modelling had predicted, according to the study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

But one of the authors, Andy Pitman, said the research should not be interpreted as diminishing the climate change problem for Australia.

He said the study found the 2- to 3-degree temperature rise would generate even fiercer heatwaves than Victoria and South Australia had this year and would have a big impact on human health and the ability of societies to cope.

"The lower figures are not as bad as 3 to 5 degrees but they're still very bad and emphasise the need to aggressively cut greenhouse gases on a global scale," Professor Pitman said.

"A 2- to 3-degree rise in the mean temperature, which people have been talking about for a long time, is important.

"But a 2- to 3-degree rise in a temperature that occurs once every 20 years is really scary," he said.

Professor Pitman said the report this week by Victoria's chief health officer on the heatwave that preceded the state's bushfires pointed to the dangers of the temperature rises when they came on top of extreme events such as heatwaves.

The report found there were 374 more deaths in the state's heatwave than would normally be expected at that time of the year.

The figure is more than double the number of deaths caused by the bushfires.

State ambulance services experienced a 34-fold rise in cases with direct heat-related conditions and nearly a three-fold increase in cardiac arrest cases.

There was almost a three-fold rise in the number of patients who were dead on arrival at emergency departments, and an eight-fold increase in direct heat-related cases.

Temperatures were 12 to 15 degrees above normal for much of Victoria during the heatwave.

"What we are saying is that with global warming, those temperatures that are rare, like those in Melbourne, will be 3 degrees warmer," Dr Pitman said.

"That has really major impacts on infrastructure, power grids and human health.

"A lot of systems out there are not built to withstand a 47-degree day in Sydney."

The models used in the UNSW study were based on projections that greenhouse gases would keep rising.

Global emissions are rising faster than those projections but Dr Pitman said he hoped that trend would slow and emissions would be cut.

"If we are stupid enough as a planet, to continue to track well above this, we are going to get worse consequences," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"When the poorly performing models were removed,...." Well, well, well. How about that? And what about the other models? And they would have us believe that this is science.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 10/04/2009 9:51:58 AM
For all the talk, Australia is still well behind on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and continues to set soft targets.

The Australian government also manipulates the figures by counting reductions in broadscale clearing towards meeting its greehouse gas emissions target.

If you want to see who is taking real action and what they are doing, look at the EU, which is taking serious action and is the leader in the related technology developments.

In fact, the federal and state governments provide very little incentive for development of greenhouse gas reduction technologies.

Posted by terry, 10/04/2009 12:56:08 PM
Don't forget that the greenhouse effect is still only a theory not proven at present. We could be going into a different weather pattern.

Naturally, this is still cause for concern but this planet has a history of extreme heat and freezing over the past millions of years.

We have only been documenting weather for just over 200 years. It still might not be the fault of mankind

Posted by gregtops, 10/04/2009 7:29:09 PM
The heat wave was caused by a low pressure feature in the Tasman Sea drawing hot desert air to Melbourne. Oodnadatta was way below the record temperature. It's another case of alarminism.

The IPCC is not a peak body of Scientific knowledge It is a politically controlled group that issues alarmist propaganda.

Posted by Len, 10/04/2009 8:16:52 PM
Terry, have you assessed the part that the EU's climate control policies played in the financial meltdown?
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 13/04/2009 7:56:00 AM
Professor Pitman, Terry, and all the other co2 climate change alarmists should read Professor Plimmer's new book, "Heaven & Earth".
Posted by ozfirst, 13/04/2009 9:30:29 AM
Maybe now would be a good time to reconsider that the growing population rate and the ongoing effects of global warming would be mittigating circumstances for large investments in hydroponics.
Posted by Atheistno1, 13/04/2009 12:54:44 PM
Of course the temperatures are rising as the last ice age closes. Once more Australia will become tropical and masssive growth will create vast peat bogs and then coal.

Where do you think the 100 metre deep Australian coal seams came from - the tooth fairy?

Posted by jaimie, 13/04/2009 2:05:37 PM
I am sure all of you are scientists and are making your statements based on scientific research. I am not that arrogant. I have searched the internet for scientific research which disproves global warming and have found none (unfortunately). The heating of the atmosphere from increasing emissions is not a theory. It is a fact and proven over recent decades. The unanswered question is how much temperatures will increase in future and what the impact will be both regionally and globally. Global temperatures have varied over the history of the earth and there is a reason for each change. CO2 emissions caused by human activity are an additional affect on top of any underlying temperature changes. Just because you don't want the changes to happen doesn't mean they are not going to happen. Good luck to your grandchildren. They will pay the price.
Posted by terry, 13/04/2009 10:03:44 PM
Stop fussing and develop nuclear power.
Posted by Final solution, 19/04/2009 10:33:51 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think Kevin Rudd needs to eat more red meat?

Yes
(89.4%)

No
(7.5%)

Other
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 548
Poll Date: 05 April, 2009

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...