News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 China trade deal at risk over farm tariffs 

China trade deal at risk over farm tariffs

21 Apr, 2009 11:10 AM
AUSTRALIA has threatened to walk away from a free trade deal with China unless Beijing agrees to get rid of tariff barriers on agricultural products.

Trade Minister Simon Crean yesterday warned that Australia would demand at least the same treatment on agriculture as Beijing has given New Zealand under a separate deal.

"I'm not going to conclude a free trade agreement for the sake of it," Mr Crean told a Melbourne business forum.

"As difficult as agriculture is on their side, there is no way we will settle for less of an outcome on agriculture than they gave New Zealand," he said.

"If they are not prepared to embrace that, forget about it — we'll go off and concentrate more of our effort on Korea and someone else."

Australia and South Korea agreed to open free trade talks earlier this year during the visit of President Lee Myung-bak.

Talks with China began in 2005 under the Howard Government. After 13 rounds of negotiations they remain deadlocked over special access to Australian markets by China's state-owned firms and the differences over tariffs.

China is Australia's second largest export market, with sales of more than $30 billion in goods and services last financial year.

The Rudd Government has pursued close ties with China, arguing on the world stage that it should have greater greater power via voting rights within the International Monetary Fund.

Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull last month criticised Mr Rudd for spending "most of his time talking about China" on his recent trip to the US, reminding him that he was not "a roving ambassador for the People's Republic of China".

Mr Crean yesterday denied the free trade talks were close to collapse. "I don't think we're at a breakdown, but you can't just negotiate with yourself," he told The Age.

He said wrapping up a free trade deal with China would send an important signal in support of open markets — which Mr Rudd has insisted on throughout the global financial crisis.

Mr Crean said the purpose of his visit to China late last month was to see if the political will exists to conclude a deal. "I've come away convinced that it does," he said.

New Zealand struck a deal with China last April to eliminate tariffs on 96 per cent of its exports, including significantly lower barriers to dairy products, fish and fruit.

Mr Crean also said China must also allow better access for the Australian services sector.

He held out the prospect of a new framework to govern investment in order "to overcome what we are experiencing at the moment, this xenophobic reaction, by virtue of the magnitude of the investment, not the principle."

Mr Crean was referring to $30 billion of Chinese investment in Australian firms recently approved, which could be doubled if the Chinalco-Rio Tinto deal goes ahead. That deal has set off a sharp debate over fears that Chinese state-owned firms are buying up strategic interests in Australia.

Until last year Australian companies had invested more in China than Chinese firms had in Australia, Mr Crean said.

Asked if he saw improvement in the Chinese economy after recent figures indicated a slight lift, Mr Crean said he had no doubt Beijing was working hard to stop growth from slipping below 8 per cent and was "optimistic" about its role in driving global recovery.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Free trade agreements are just that, an even playing field between two states, to come to an agreement where barriers (tariffs) are in place defeats the purpose of what your trying to do, so continue to play hard ball Simon.
Posted by Ken, 21/04/2009 9:59:21 PM
Best thing that could happen is to have nothing to do with China. Australian farm subsidies are about 4% of farm income, in China it is around 78%.
Posted by jaimie, 22/04/2009 1:11:21 PM
Ah, the sweet sound of Labor trying to talk tough when they have no intention of standing up to China anyway.

Look at their glowing record. Have Labor taken on China over human rights abuses in the mainland or Tibet? Have they protested over late term abortions and genocide? Have they come out in defence over Taiwan's sovereignty?

Indeed, the best thing would be to refuse a mythical free trade agreement with China (which could never be either free or fair) and choose a government willing to call a spade a spade, take the hard line and make China realise it cannot continue to have its own way on everything, accountable to no one, just based on its sheer numbers. It's the moral thing to do.

Posted by Andrew Phillips, 22/04/2009 8:46:46 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think tree changers generally have realistic expectations of rural life when they move to the bush?

Yes
(9.8%)

No
(89%)

Other
(1.2%)

Total Votes: 764
Poll Date: 19 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Rural Bookshop
 
photo gallery
 
S&L Twitter
 
S&L Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...