News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Climate talks fizzle out 

Climate talks fizzle out

13 Apr, 2009 04:00 AM
THE latest round of international climate change negotiations has ended in a familiar stalemate, with the wealthiest nations refusing to meet demands to introduce tougher greenhouse targets.

Despite high expectations, the first United Nations climate meeting attended by the Obama Administration fizzled out without a clear plan for reaching a post-Kyoto climate deal, due to be signed in December in Copenhagen.

Climate Institute policy director Erwin Jackson, a 20-year observer of climate talks, said most countries were "sleep-walking" towards the year-end deadline.

"There is no sense of momentum, no sense of building trust and no sense within the negotiations about how we are going to resolve the outstanding issues," he said after the end of the 10-day talks in Germany.

The gathering of 2600 officials from 175 countries for the first major climate talks for 2009 was seen as critical for two reasons: it was to lay the groundwork for a deal in Copenhagen and as an insight into the intentions of new US President Barack Obama.

While US climate envoy Todd Stern did not announce firm proposals, he did raise expectations by saying the US knew it needed to do more than Mr Obama's pre-election promise to return emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 for a strong deal to be secured.

Several major developed nations, including Japan, are yet to reveal how far they are prepared to cut their greenhouse emissions.

Australia announced its targets in December — a cut of 5 to 15 per cent below 2000 levels by 2020 — but is yet to submit them to the UN.

Australia's chief climate diplomat, Howard Bamsey, said the targets would be tabled at the next meeting in June.

Observers said it was increasingly clear leadership would need to come from a meeting of 17 major economies convened by Mr Obama for April and July.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Climate change in the form of carbon dioxide does not exist. It is caused by the sun and at the moment we are in a deep solar minimum, thus causing the Australian drought down south.

It will end. That suggests that we do not need a Minister for Climate Change at all.

Posted by Solar Observer, 13/04/2009 8:30:47 AM
Interesting that the government officials in Copenhagen could not make a decision. Around the same time, the International Climate Change conference was held in New York.

It's worth noting that:

In Copenhagen:

•The climate alarmist conference in Copenhagen was attended by over 2,000 activists, mostly non-scientists.

• The conference duly warned of even higher sea levels and even higher global temperatures all presaging even greater catastrophes. (Calculated by models that can not even forecast the present.)

• The Copenhagen meeting was not about science, it was about politics and prophecy.

In New York:

•...some 700 climate “sceptics”, many of them scientists...

• This was a wholly different kind of affair. It focussed on the science of climate change, the latest scientific data, and climate trends.

Unfortunately the Scientists meeting got hardly any coverage in the main stream media.

Facts re climate change can be found at: www.climatesceptics.com.au

Posted by Geoff from Ourimbah, 13/04/2009 9:24:16 AM
Climate change is perhaps the biggest hoax for all mankind. Climate change occurs over thousands of years not just a decade or two. We have had eight, yes eight, major ice ages in the past 2 million years or so.

The world's climate is still recovering from the last one and in a few thousand years the arctic will become semi-tropical once more.

Then, in a hundred thousand years or so another ice age will occur. I assure you the sky is not falling, as some scare mongers claim.

Posted by jaimie, 13/04/2009 2:00:34 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 April, 2009
09 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Will the Federal Government do a better job of delivering fast broadband to the bush than private enterprise?

Yes, the Federal Government will do a better job.
(36.2%)

No, private enterprise will do a better job.
(63.8%)

Total Votes: 585
Poll Date: 09 April, 2009

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...