News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Consumers swing to grassfed beef 

Consumers swing to grassfed beef

13 Apr, 2009 12:50 PM
A MAJOR shift appears to be taking place across the global beef industry as consumers everywhere rein in their spending patterns in the wake of the current global financial crisis.

The world’s largest burger chain, McDonald’s, recently announced plans to open 1,000 new restaurants worldwide in 2009 as consumers seek cheaper eating out options.

In Australia, the world’s largest beef producer, the Australian Agricultural Company recently claimed that over the short to medium term, the likely trend in consumer sentiment would be towards lower-cost beef products.

In response, it plans to adapt its flexible pathway system to be weighted more heavily towards less costly grassfed beef production.

These examples illustrate responses to the broader shifts being seen among cost-conscious beef consumers everywhere, which will deliver new medium-term supply challenges for the Australian industry.

These consumer trends include:

• Selection of lower-priced cuts of meat over premium cuts.

• Reduction in business among high-end and family restaurants, and corresponding growth in hamburger and other cheaper food service options based on manufacturing meat.

• Replacement of dining out with less expensive at-home entertaining.

• In markets like Korea, some importers are modifying their order specifications, requesting beef from animals grainfed for shorter periods, or moving from grainfed to grassfed.

Meat and Livestock Australia chairman Don Heatley says the defensive response by consumers to the current economic climate will inevitably impact on the Australian industry.

“Whatever decisions are made at the production level this year will be as a direct result of consumer signals,” he says.

“We are seeing much the same trend in all markets – the knock-on effect of the decline in disposable income is flowing back into red meat demand.

"Consumers don’t want to stop eating red meat outright.

"But it is the form it is presented in that is changing.

"And greater demand for manufacturing meat in many markets is an example of that.”

Mr Heatley says it's fortunate that a good season in many key beef production areas of Australia this year means Australia’s capacity to produce larger volumes of quality grassfed beef at lower cost has improved.

“There is a stronger push evident this year to produce not only more grinding beef, but bigger quantities of quality grassfed table meat, particularly in more northern regions of the country and those areas further south that have had a decent season,” he says.

But while the lotfeeding industry has experienced tough times over the past year, it is certainly not down and out in the current market environment.

“Regardless of global economic conditions, there will always be those consumers with the capacity and willingness to spend money on higher quality product,” Mr Heatley says.

While grassfed table beef often still carries a reputation for being more inconsistent in terms of eating quality than does the grainfed product, he says the increasing uptake of Meat Standards Australia (MSA) tenderness guarantee systems will help underpin much of that abundant grassfed product likely to be generated this year.

“As MSA has become increasingly accepted and expanded by the larger processors, it has provided more opportunities for grassfed products underpinned by MSA and pulled through by brand programs to gain greater recognition.” he says.

While MSA is on track to grade more than 800,000 head of cattle across Australia for the year ending June 30, the target for 2009-10 is one million head.

And an increasingly large proportion of those animals are likely to be grassfed.

Speaking after an MSA producer forum in Roma, Qld, on Friday, Teys Brothers livestock general manager Geoff Teys said while feedlot numbers in the near-term look likely to remain very low, MSA grading of grassfed cattle is starting to take off.

* Extract from the National Beef Review, included in the April 9 editions of Rural Press's weekly agricultural newspapers, The Land, Queensland Country Life, Stock & Land, Stock Journal, Farm Weekly and the North Queensland Register.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm surprised that this article does not pick up on the tremendous benefits of eating grassfed meats (beef, lamb, poultry or other). Being a consumer who appreciates the nutritional difference between grass fed and grain fed, I'm disturbed to see the lot feeding of lamb has started. Grassfed products are rich in all the fats now proven to be health-enhancing, but low in the fats that have been linked with disease. Grass-fed beef is naturally leaner than grain-fed beef. Omega 3s in beef that feed on grass is 7% of the total fat content, compared to 1% in grain-only fed beef. Grass-fed beef has the recommended ratio of omega 6 to omega 3 fats (3:1.) Grass-fed beef is loaded with other natural minerals and vitamins, plus it's a great source of CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) a fat that reduces the risk of cancer, obesity, diabetes, and a number of immune disorders. CLA is in fact, the only known antioxidant/anticarcinogen primarily associated with animal foods. North Dakota State University conducted a study on the nutritional differences between grass-fed and grain-fed The grass-fed had omega 6 to omega 3 ratios of 4.0 to one, and the grain-fed had ratios of 21 to one. Additional studies by others clearly show that the longer cattle are fed grain, the greater the fatty acid imbalance. For instance, after 200 days in the feedlot grain-fed cattle have omega 6 to omega 3 ratios that exceed 20 to one. For more information see: http://health-care-aus.org/cla_a.htm
Posted by ggwagga, 14/04/2009 7:58:17 AM
Could it be that we're recognising that not only does grass fed beef taste better - as proven in taste test after taste test - its environmental footprint is very much smaller. A good sign.
Posted by john newton, 14/04/2009 8:55:52 AM
Hi John, Hi GG at Wagga. As the instigator of 5 years of beef palatibility trials that found in favour of the flavour of pasture fed, free range meat against feedlot meat - which is the commonly held position of many in the beef industry - our results did not find that feedlot meat 'will be tenderer' was a given. Both finishing systems deliver tough and tender meat, there being so many other issues involved (animal age, stress, breed, processing regimes, post-slaughter ageing).

The other strongly held position is that there is greater consistency in feedlot beef. But consistency in what? - cattle from the same paddock or pasture region will display similar meat flavours; cattle from the same feedlot will do the same - but change the pasture species/region and the feedlot ration and there is no longer any consistency in taste.

Also contrary to the common cant that feedlot meat will be tenderer than grassfed our highly qualified panel (researching approx. 1,200 hd over 7 programmes in 5 years) found this in no way categorical, with similar textural variance across cattle from the same feedlot as from the same paddock.

What did seem to matter were animal age (over 15months and up to 24 months for best results); some breed influence (regarding muscle fibre,age of animal maturity, reaction to handling...), transport conditions and processing procedures. Finally post-slaughter ageing affected muscle fibre break down and meat flavour - to the point that over-aged meat became unpalatably mushy and liverish in flavour removing all original flavour consistencies. This applied to cattle from both finishing regimes.

In all, Australia has a wonderful advantage over most other meat exporters. We still have large tracts of 'clean' grasslands and open woodlands for our grazing animals. Managed appropriately these grazing animals will augment landscapes rather than deplete them - as was the original blueprint for life on these plainlands (that is before fences). We now know (and have for some time) the health benefits of grass fed meat as listed above by ggwagga, however the climatic exigencies of the world's semi-arid plainlands and winters mean that grain is often used to implement the production of meat but the sheer energy and volume of inputs required to produce grain to feed to animals happy with grass, shrubs, leaves and even bark that come with the paddock has to be accounted for when considering the grass/grain debate.

There is also a growing body of consumers worldwide that are looking for assurances regarding the quality of an animal's life pre-slaughter and for me that means free range be it my eggs, chicken, beef or lamb.

I firmly believe that well managed animal husbandry that allows for a natural production environment is better for the planet than covering it with the extra grain/pulse production needed to replace the goodies in meat.

Posted by deb, 14/04/2009 3:15:53 PM
Couldn't be that consumers want a guarantee that stock is not fed on GM grain? Regardless of the humanitarian picture painted by pro GM groups, the majority of GM grain is for animal feed. No surprise, then, that Big Biotech is now looking at GM grass...they'll get us one way or another!
Posted by Hebe, 14/04/2009 7:33:41 PM
As a meat consumer, my preference is for grassfed beef / lamb and I go out of my way to find local suppliers. It does taste better.

It seems to me that the more we have interfered with our food products from how the animals are fed and housed to the laboratory-made foodstuffs that adorn our supermarket shelves, the worse our health has become.

Being among the FAT nations is not a desirable place to be. Thankfully, people can have access to natural products that can be of help.

Posted by towardswellness, 15/04/2009 5:20:01 PM
Hebe, you are probably right on the GM factor. Informed consumers wish to stay well away from anything that is GM - directly or indirectly.
Posted by ggwagga, 15/04/2009 6:20:26 PM
Deb, is there anywhere you have your trial work published? I would be very interested in reading the work you have carried out.
Posted by ggwagga, 16/04/2009 7:48:08 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Hambuger chain McDonald's in Japan has been running a TV campaign featuring Australian-grown grinding beef, reflecting the swing among consumers to lower cost food as the new world order gains traction following the economic shakeout.
Hambuger chain McDonald's in Japan has been running a TV campaign featuring Australian-grown grinding beef, reflecting the swing among consumers to lower cost food as the new world order gains traction following the economic shakeout.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Will the Federal Government do a better job of delivering fast broadband to the bush than private enterprise?

Yes, the Federal Government will do a better job.
(36.2%)

No, private enterprise will do a better job.
(63.8%)

Total Votes: 585
Poll Date: 09 April, 2009

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...