News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Darling only scores a trickle from Tamworth floods 

Darling only scores a trickle from Tamworth floods

07 Dec, 2008 01:40 PM
If you were to float a paper boat in flood-stricken Tamworth, in theory it would drift 1000 kilometres into Menindee Lakes six weeks from today. But there its journey would end.

The flood dumped on the New England region by 160 millimetres of rain in 24 hours this week will take weeks to creep through the meandering network of river systems across north-west NSW and do little to ease drought conditions for any distance downstream, according to a Newcastle University environmental engineer, Professor Gary Willgoose.

The flood is a bonanza for local irrigators along the banks of the Namoi River, where cotton is the main summer cash crop and about 50 extra-allocation water licences have been granted this week, but barely a trickle will get beyond that to the Darling.

About 135,000 megalitres of extra water will flow out of Tamworth's swollen Peel River and into the Namoi as a result of the flood, said State Water's northern manager, Craig Cahill.

"I think we'll see about 45,000 of these pumped out by the irrigators, which is not as much as they could take, because the water is moving a bit too fast for the pumps," Mr Cahill said.

"We are looking at 50 to 60 pump sites that have expressed an interest in accessing those flows."

Professor Willgoose estimated that if everyone holding a valid water licence in northern NSW was able to access the amount they are entitled to on paper, the rivers would be pumped completely dry.

"This has been a big problem for the national water inventory," Willgoose said.

"Even more worrying, you have farmers who have taken out bank loans on the basis that they can grow crops using the entitlements, so you have numbers of them who are technically bankrupt at the moment.

"That is before you start looking at the issue of environmental flows and recharging the wetlands."

Despite the grumbles of downstream graziers, the real reason why the flood will not ease the drought much beyond its own neighbourhood is 13 million years old.

A chain of huge volcanoes erupted across New England in prehistoric times, sending lava out across the landscape and laying the basalt foundation for the richest farming soil in the state.

The black soil of the Liverpool Plains also absorbs water like a sponge and the flood will replenish local aquifers that have been undernourished for at least five years.

"Most of it would certainly be percolated into the ground water," said Dr Glenn Wilson of the University of New England's School of Environmental and Rural Science.

"I'd also expect a fair bit of it to get absorbed by the banks, which are spongy. Most of it will simply soak away."

Professor Willgoose gave the mythical paper boat borne on the Tamworth flood "fifty-fifty" odds of reaching the Darling River but said its chances of sailing on to the Murray were "hundreds to one - or nil".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We should follow the Good Professor's comments, I hope he knows something of sailing.
Posted by white lighting, 8/12/2008 5:52:46 AM
Is it right that irriagators turn their pumps on as soon as there is water in an up-stream river, rather than consider down stream users too? So what about the health of the Murray-Darling system? Does the long-term interests of the country and its river system get forgotten the moment irrigators can fire up there pumps? The National agreement on water can't happen soon enough if these State authorities show such disregard for the national interest.
Posted by balance, 8/12/2008 8:16:36 AM
The Murray-Darling system is in crisis, but our top priority is to waste water on cotton.
Posted by Barney, 8/12/2008 9:00:40 AM
Additional allocations at a time when we are in transition to the new Authority for the basin is outrageous. Secondly it highlights the inadequacy of the Authority regardless of which brand as the tributaries to the Murray and Darling are not part of the management of our total basin and the total water resource. Shame Shame Shame
Posted by twodragons, 8/12/2008 9:21:02 AM
Irrigating a cotton crop with high flow water is not a waste. It is a good and efficent use of resources.
Posted by Feathers, 8/12/2008 10:01:00 AM
G'day balance, what you suggest there is absolutely NOT the case. It is however what the urban greens opposing irrigation would like you to believe. It suits their agenda to start de-populating the inland by peddling this ignorance & misinformation.
Posted by Trev, 8/12/2008 11:26:19 AM
You can’t blame the farmer for taking advantage of what ever legally comes his way be it a so called normal year or after so many years of drought; many would only be fighting for survival as they always have done through hard times. They say if you have a good year farming it is only a bonus as most years are tough. The fate that awaits the downstream population is not the upstream farmers fault; it is the fault of ill perceived agricultural practices (inappropriate crops), legislation and a complete lack of any understanding of how nature works that has let situations like the granting of 50 extra-allocation water licences happen. As far as Australia is concerned continental drying is a far greatest problem than global warming at present. Forget future carbon credits if there is no water about to grow plants forget agriculture; if there is no ecology for that matter you will be able to forget about people, you can’t eat computer models, budgets, legislation or rhetoric.
Posted by Richard Woolley, 8/12/2008 11:28:56 AM
Ever done a pee on the lawn? No-one in their right mind would expect it to go all the way down the street. Never has and never will. At least the grass will grow greener close to where it falls.
Posted by TimKI, 8/12/2008 6:32:06 PM
The 50 extra allocation licences may be to cover some of the losses in entitlements irrigators have had over the past 5 yrs. The water won't make it into the Murray, not because of irrigators, but because of the country it flows through. At Wee Waa, the river spills at 5000 mgL a day, so a lot will go overland, which is dry, and where will it go, the ground. A lot will evaporate, must be 2000 plus kms of river from Tamworth to the lakes. A lot will go through seepage into the river banks. (see above distances) The cotton reference is there for sensationalism. It's too late to plant cotton now, so unless they speculated on a crop with no water (highly unlikely) it will go on somesthing like sorghum (bird seed), soy beans (human food) or winter cereals. Remembering less then 20% of irrigation country in Australia is into cotton this year. Also remember, grapes use more water per hectare annually, they get water every year (special rules on permanent planting), and most grapes are grown around the Murray Darling Basin. But we need wine to forget.
Posted by farmer08, 9/12/2008 6:24:36 AM
Some very interesting feedback from all - it is good to have a discussion to help us all understand the issues. If we keep stopping the flow into the Murray-Darling system because 'it will all seep into the riverbanks' then our National river system is done for! How much water is used per ha to grow a cotton crop - by flood irrigation? and by drip irrigation? Most grapes in the SA Riverland now are grown on drip using about 4Ml/ha for a gross return of around $12,000. How does cotton compare? I hear yesterday there is to be a four-fold increase in the area planted to rice in Aust. this year. I have worked in the cotton on the Namoi for 4 years, I now live in SA.
Posted by balance, 10/12/2008 12:20:49 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should the Nationals split from the Coalition?

Yes
(48.8%)

No
(47%)

Undecided
(4.1%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 07 December, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...