News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Farmers won't go with flow and sell water licences 

Farmers won't go with flow and sell water licences

19/05/2008 8:49:00 AM
Farmers will resist selling their water licences to the Federal Government because trading their water is one of the few ways they can make money during dry years, a new report has found, raising concern over whether the water buyback scheme will work.

The Government has allocated $3 billion from its $12.9 billion water budget to buy water from irrigators in the Murray-Darling Basin to return it to the collapsing river system.

The report, commissioned by one of Australia's largest suppliers of irrigation pipes, Crane Group, argues that the buybacks will not be enough in the short term, and that speeding up the rebuilding of irrigation systems will recover almost 20 times more water.

"If farmers perceive that a drought is likely to occur, they are more likely to hold on to their current water entitlements, as they foresee an increase in the price of their asset," the report says.

Crane Group's chief executive, Greg Sedgwick, is lobbying the Government to quickly release money for irrigation upgrades.

"There is much greater certainty that infrastructure projects can deliver, on the national priority of security, healthy rivers while the necessary market mechanisms are developed to support effective water buybacks," Mr Sedgwick said.

The office of the Climate Change Minister, Penny Wong, said there would be considerable delays in beginning irrigation upgrades while they were being designed and assessed.

An independent member of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission, Ian Kowalich, said the report raised important questions about how soon water for environmental flows could get into the river system.

"If we don't get sustainable flows into the system, we will do long-term damage that will take decades to fix," Mr Kowalich said.

"The real issue is whether going into the market to buy water will do it quickly enough."

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


BS - there is plenty of water that can be accumulated on the open market from willing sellers who have listed their water with brokers and don't know or care who buys it, only problem is now we have some stiff competition when it comes to buying all the water, from Penny Wong.....

PS Malcolm Turnbull for prime minister and go away nick xenophon.

Posted by macquarie agri on 20/05/2008 7:45:09 AM
Rebuilding irrigation systems is a very slow process.

It alone will not solve the problems of the Murray-Darling, especially with the idiotic idea of giving half the savings to the irrigators.

All of the savings need to go back to the rivers.

Many irrigators, especially downstream irrigators realise they would be better off if the river flows were more certain and salt levels reduced.

Posted by Barney on 20/05/2008 9:41:07 AM
The interesting thing is that if you sell water at a good price and put the money in the bank you get a return while not looking at the market every year or getting zero return if the dams are full and no one wants water on the temporary market.
Posted by Sceptic on 20/05/2008 10:08:27 AM
Good on the farmers.

I have wondered where the food will come from now the Rudd government has preferred ducks to rice growing in the Murray Darling Catchment.

With world rice consumers in the majority how will the World Food Organization feed a fraction of the population?

The WFO have announced that countries like Australia must pay more into feeding the poverty stricken nations.

Who decides which ones are the needy and who is being greedy?

Posted by Pam Prince on 20/05/2008 11:05:15 AM
Government is going about it in a wrong way - water buyback is an overly simplistic crowd pleaser!

It highlights the new Governments political tactics and lack of experience and forsight (not that previous government much better).

Investment should first focus on infrastructure to improve the efficiency of irrigation systems - this will provide a longer term solution.

Gigalitres are wasted in evaporation and seepage from open channels and flood irrigation every year!

Water savings from more efficient infrastructure (improving application and delivery of irrigation water) can be redirected to the river system.

Redirected water could form part of irrigators' contribution for infrastructure improvments.

Simply buying up water will potentially sacrifice future productivity - which is already severly reduced and at at threat from furthur climate change.

Procrastination on this issue continues - as indicated by Ms Wong who is already making excuses.

Posted by damodoyle on 20/05/2008 12:01:25 PM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do rate this year's Federal Budget offerings for rural and regional Australia?

Excellent
(1.3%)

Good
(2.8%)

Average
(9.5%)

Poor
(37.7%)

Terrible
(48.7%)

Total Votes: 316
Poll Date: 18/05/2008

27/08/2008 | IF farmers are wondering what the new look Senate will mean for them, they should just take a look at politics in NSW and the behind-closed-doors relationship between Labor and the Greens for a taste of what might be in store Federally.
S&L Advertising
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia