News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Garnaut: Agriculture out, but petrol in 

Garnaut: Agriculture out, but petrol in

4/07/2008 5:02:00 PM
AS expected, Professor Ross Garnaut recommended agriculture should not be part of an emissions trading scheme from the start, but said the scheme must be broad in coverage when it is fully operational.

Professor Garnaut's 600-page draft report, Garnaut Climate Change Review, was released in Canberra today and said climate change was a "diabolical policy problem".

"It is harder than any other issue of high importance that has come before our polity in living memory," he said.

"While an effective response to the challenge would play out over many decades, it must take shape and be put in place over the next few years."

Professor Garnaut's report said the impacts of climate change on Australians and the Australian economy would be insidious rather than directly confrontational.

He said delaying action now was not delaying a decision, but making one that chose to do nothing.

"The solution to this challenge must be found in removing the links between economic growth and greenhouse emissions," Prof Garnaut said during the launch.

The draft report looks at specific modelling on the cost of climate change without action, and looks at a framework for an emissions trading scheme in Australia which would see agriculture intially excluded, while petrol is included.

But he warns the cost of being part of the scheme "by ourselves" without other international trading partners and developed countries in particular doing the same would erode confidence in Australia's market system.

He said there would be a mechanism in the scheme he proposes to review the system in Australia if other countries are not on board.

"What Australia does, does matter," he said.

"If we're out on our own by 2020 there are mechanisms for review."

He said the Kyoto targets were the "centerpiece" to the emissions trading scheme which would have broad coverage.

Professor Garnaut has recommended the need for a much bigger effort in research and development into low emissions technology.

There is a significant amount of modelling in the review on the affects of climate change over time on the Murray Darling Basin system, which Professor Garnaut said "would be mourned" if it was to disappear as a result.

He said under a "business as usual" scenario, run offs into the Murray Darling Basin would be gone over time.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The Profit of doom has spoken. If he was a believer I would have taken him more seriously. He has tremendous power for he and Bob Hawke destroyed organised primary industry and John Howard inherited the mess we have now. Who is going to clean up the mess after Him and Rudd? Better pray for righteous Leaders for the nation. And learn how to get a place in the trough to get a share of the spoils.
Posted by Richie10 on 4/07/2008 9:06:37 PM
As usual us aussies are going to save the world. Good to see. Forget farmers wear the costs of saving the world as they can't pass the costs on. Could someone tell me what the climate here in Australia was like in 900 ad when the vikings were farming Greenland untill 1300 ad when it froze over?
Posted by The Battler on 4/07/2008 9:13:52 PM
To unilaterally emasculate ourselves economically is not a particularly clever thing to do when attempting to placate the hot air cult.
Posted by ken on 4/07/2008 10:48:59 PM
Yes, you guys are so right, over 31,000 scientists, 900 of them with Ph.D's say that global warming is a myth, and only 600 scientists and so called experts believe in it yet the powers to be push this myth as though it was fact. All you have to do is talk to the oldies and they will tell you that either they or their parents/grandparents went through droughts and temperatures just the same, it is just a cycle, but as there is big bucks to be made out of putting fear into people, they keep pushing it. Every time something is proven to be a joke like the bird flu, they bring out something else to keep us in great fear.
Posted by Gaye on 6/07/2008 10:11:12 PM
If anyone claims global warming is a myth they need to argue their case with science. I have searched the intenet and I have not found any scientific evidence at all which says it is a myth.

The evidence is that global warming is true. Fact - CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Fact - Average temperatures this century have increased in direct correlation to CO2 increases. If we do not act, we cannot say "Oops sorry" in one hundred years time.

A lot of Australians in the armed forces died for the present we have now. Now it is our turn to ensure the future generations have a future.

Posted by Terry on 7/07/2008 3:49:26 PM
Terry, who cares if your right or wrong, to cut our greenhouse gas unilaterally while the big CO2 producers do nothing will do nothing to mitigate CO2 and will seriously damage our economy now. The best thing we can do now would be to develop energy options that aren't a problem in an intelligent way.
Posted by Ken on 13/07/2008 5:53:55 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do you rate the effectiveness of the current exceptional circumstances drought assistance program?

Excellent
(8.1%)

Good
(17.2%)

Average
(17.7%)

Poor
(24.7%)

Terrible
(32.3%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 6/07/2008

26/11/2008 | If we're serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.
 
S&L Advertising
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...