News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Generic food brands could cost health 

Generic food brands could cost health

16 Apr, 2009 06:43 PM
Tough times are driving many people to cheaper, generically branded food, but it could be at the cost of their health, the National Heart Foundation says.

Early results of a foundation analysis comparing generic products with branded goods show the cheaper in-house brands generally contain significantly more salt, saturated and trans fats and more calories than branded products.

Concerned that the supermarket chains are increasingly loading their shelves with home brands in an era when consumers are tightening their purses, the foundation has analysed 5000 packaged food products, including canned food, margarine, breads and breakfast cereals.

Dr Lyn Roberts, the foundation's chief executive, told the National Press Club yesterday that more than 60 per cent of consumers said they had switched to cheaper supermarket brands.

Dr Roberts said if the rising incidences of obesity, diabetes and physical inactivity continue, cardiovascular death rates could begin to rise, after years of decline.

One reason for this is the pressure on shoppers to be influenced by clever marketing.

The number of products with the Heart Foundation tick had failed to increase at the same rate as that of the number of choices confronting supermarket shoppers.

"Cheaper foods often equal cheaper, less healthy ingredients such as cakes, biscuits, and fried chicken cooked in cheap imported palm oil laden with saturated fat," Dr Roberts said.

Palm oil, used for frying and in products such as biscuits, ice cream and chocolate, contain 55 per cent saturated fat, compared with about 12 per cent in sunflower-canola blend oil.

Woolworths has challenged the findings, claiming that branded and unbranded products were often identical.

"In many instances, supermarket private label products are exactly the same as the branded equivalent: same ingredients, same recipe, same factory, same manufacturer," Luke Schepen, a spokesman for Woolworths, said.

He said the company benchmarked its products against those of branded competitors regularly, "to ensure we can match or better them in terms of quality, ingredients, nutritional content and value."

Coles's response was not available as this report went to press.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
To Woolworths and Coles, I say "claptrap". Look carefully at their own brand name labels, and you will see that an extreme minority of their products are made of Australian products or even manufactured in Australia.

Their own brands are proudly proclaiming that they are made in China, Peru, Taiwan, Thailand and who knows where else.

The point is, they get these products made of foreign produce which has little quality control, and sell them here, to the cost of Australian farmers. Please tell me how this is a good thing for consumers.

Some of the countries of origin are so badly polluted that no Australian State would allow the manufacture of food products of that standard within our country. Woolworths and Coles are not doing our farmers or consumers any favours.

Posted by Trugger, 16/04/2009 7:58:03 PM
I'm no great fan of "The Big Two", and in fact their generic brands are often made from imported ingredients or are fully imported but I'd be concerned about conflict of interest in the Heart Foundation's view here. I'm pretty sure generics almost never, if at all, pay for the "Tick", so it's not in the Foundation's interest to look on them favourably. No suggestion of impropriety, just a perceived conflict of interest.
Posted by DMS, 17/04/2009 9:03:50 AM
National Heart Foundation are heavily funded by some well known brands. I can't believe that their conflict of interest is not declared and that they would so brazenly disingenous.

Most Choice analyses of the generics show little difference from the main brands. National Heart Foundation has shown their true colours - not enough science and a blatant disregard of ethics.

Posted by Richard, 17/04/2009 10:05:53 AM
No doubt generic brands are sometimes inferior but often they are identical to branded products - check the kilojoules of energy per 100g and if they are the same you can assume the product is identical. The biggest concerns with generic products are that they concentrate power with the big 3 and drive down prices of competitive branded products which in turn adopt the same cost cutting methods as the generic stuff. The result is that farmers will lose out in their attempt to get a fair price for produce. It is not really fair to suggest that we should avoid imported stuff per se. Most of the people in those countries are a lot poorer than us and it is better that we give them some support at home rather than deal with increases in economic refugees. After all we rely on them buying our resources in return. If you can afford branded stuff that supports Aussie farmers and manufacturers then well and good but let's appreciate that quality imported stuff is a valid choice as well.
Posted by Mick, 18/04/2009 2:11:00 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The financial downturn has seen a jump in the popularity of home brand supermarket products.
The financial downturn has seen a jump in the popularity of home brand supermarket products.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
14 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Will the Federal Government do a better job of delivering fast broadband to the bush than private enterprise?

Yes, the Federal Government will do a better job.
(36.2%)

No, private enterprise will do a better job.
(63.8%)

Total Votes: 585
Poll Date: 09 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...