News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 GM food guide out to name and shame 

GM food guide out to name and shame

29 Oct, 2009 10:00 AM
A FOOD guide revealing which companies are believed to be using undeclared genetically engineered (GM) ingredients will step into a breach left by the Government's failure to reform inadequate food labelling laws, the guide's publishers say.

Greenpeace released its Truefood Guide yesterday, with Cadbury, Western Star, Kraft and Woolworths, along with the baby food producers Karicare and Nutricia, among the dozens of companies named because they either do not have a clear non-GM policy or have refused to reveal whether they use GM ingredients in their products.

Nestle, Foster's and Schweppes are among the hundreds of companies listed which have instituted a ban on the use of GM ingredients.

The guide comes as locally grown GM canola oil is about to enter the human food supply for the first time, making its way into a wide range of products from margarines and dairy products to breads and confectionery.

Consumers will have no way of knowing whether they are eating food made from GM ingredients, however, because oils, starches and sugars are some of the products the Australian food regulator has exempted from mandatory labelling regarding their GM status.

Greenpeace's GM campaigner, Rochelle Porteous, said the guide would equip Australian consumers with the same level of information enjoyed by people living within the European Union, where all GM ingredients must be labelled on processed foods.

''Consumers have a fundamental right to know what's in their food and how it is produced,'' she said.

A comprehensive review of the country's present labelling laws was announced by a joint state and federal government ministerial council on Friday.

But the council's decision to allow food manufacturers to continue concealing the trans fat content of their products has angered health and nutrition experts.

Food Standards Australia New Zealand has defended the decision, arguing that manufacturers in general were reducing the amount of trans fat they used and the average Australian was consuming less of the fats than the World Health Organisation's recommendation of less than 1 per cent of total energy intake.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We will never get sense from govt bodies. The last thing any govt wants is true democracy, because they cannot trust the majority of people to think first and only of the politician, and their backers betterment.

Most of these agendas are driven by secret deals behind "free trade" agreements.

Posted by denis, 30/10/2009 5:11:18 AM
Interesting that there is no test that can tell the difference between Canola oil derived from GM, conventional or the mutant Triazine tolerant (TT) varieties.

Maybe all processed foods should add “may contain oil derived from modified, mutant or chemically protected plants” just like every packet now seemingly has the disclaimer “may contain traces of peanuts”…

This is such as first world, middle class obsession that is in complete denial of the major human health problem facing our species this century – starvation.

Posted by really and truly, 30/10/2009 7:54:46 AM
The adoption of simple and improved organic practices continues to show that organic systems can feed the world.

SRI stands for the System of Rice Intensification and is a cultivation system that is ideally suited to organic production. SRI can out yield many of the current conventional rice production systems in developing countries.

Researchers at Cornell University in the USA reported: 'Several different studies in Madagascar, where average rice yields are currently 2 t/ha, have shown that with SRI methods an average yield around 8 tons per hectare (t/ha) is attainable.

'High yields are in the 12-15 t/ha range, while some low yields of 3-4 t/ha. Maximum yields, obtained with the most skillful use of SRI techniques and after soil quality has been improved by good management methods, are in the range of 15-20 t/ha, and a few farmers have topped 20 t/ha.'

Most significantly, SRI uses between 25pc to 50pc less water than traditional paddy systems. SRI shows that there are low cost ways to effectively improve farming yields without the expensive and unnecessary investments in GMO's and toxic chemicals.

Posted by freeranger, 30/10/2009 2:57:45 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The Greenpeace guide comes as locally grown GM canola oil is about to enter the human food supply for the first time, making its way into a wide range of products from margarines and dairy products to breads and confectionery.
The Greenpeace guide comes as locally grown GM canola oil is about to enter the human food supply for the first time, making its way into a wide range of products from margarines and dairy products to breads and confectionery.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
22 October, 2009
14 October, 2009
07 October, 2009
02 October, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
26 October, 2009
27 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For what level of cattle transaction levy will you be voting at this year's Meat and Livestock Australia annual general meeting?

$3.50
(64.9%)

$5
(35.1%)

Total Votes: 276
Poll Date: 25 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...