News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Govt passes controversial horse levy 

Govt passes controversial horse levy

03 Sep, 2008 03:37 PM
The Government has succeeded in passing a controversial bill through the House of Representatives aimed at imposing a levy on horse owners to help cover the response to future disease outbreaks, like Equine Influenza.

After three days of debate in parliament this week, the Bill was yesterday passed by the House of Representatives.

If Labor can successfully negotiate with the minor parties a safe passage for the Bill through the Senate, horse owners will be levied in the same way other livestock owners are to help split the cost recovery for responding to exotic disease outbreaks.

Coalition MPs opposed the Bill, arguing it unfairly placed the majority of the burden on the amateur sports and pleasure horse industry, over the highly commercial thoroughbred and racing industries.

Opposition MPs argued the Bill would not capture the majority of horses in Australia either, with only 50,000-60-000 registered out of an estimated 1.2m horses in Australia.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Of course there will always be a future for young people in agriculture. Will it provide the same fulfilling lifestyle as for those that choose to leave? On average probably not. In all walks of life there are successes and failures and all shades in between but the harder you work the luckier you'll get.
Posted by Country, 3/09/2008 11:40:08 PM
does anyone know how much the horse levy will be and who will have to pay it?
Posted by smokey, 4/09/2008 1:10:48 AM
This is a set up from the start when people were asked to register their horses. All the more for the dog food industry and vote of no confidence for the government.
Posted by Peter, 4/09/2008 7:01:13 AM
We pay a levy through the rural lands protection board when we have no cattle or sheep so why isn't there a levy through them to help with the cost? If the horse industry has to pay for their horses then why do we have to also pay for beef and sheep industry and their diseases as well? a bit unfair and maybe the Rural lands protection fees should be revisited to make these levies fair and just.
Posted by jacki, 4/09/2008 7:01:31 AM
The opposition has got it in one!
Posted by Realist, 4/09/2008 8:05:08 AM
OBVIOUSLY THE OPINIONS OF SO MANY AUSTRALIANS (HORSE OWNERS) ANIMAL LOVERS, HAVE NO VOICE IN THIS MATTER. AS WE ALL KNOW THE AUSTRALIAN QUARANTINE SERVICE LET THIS DISEASE IN TO THE COUNTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE. AS WE LIVE ON A ISLAND, AND HORSES DONT SWIM TO THE MAINLAND, WHY AS AUSSIES ARE WE BEING CHARGED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY BREACH.
Posted by shayno, 4/09/2008 10:22:44 AM
RLPB staff played a pivotal and critical role in the eradication of horse flu at great expense to the organisation as well as NSW DPI. Most horses are a luxury so this is just another luxury tax. Sheep & beef maintain our landscape locking up carbon in the process and help feed and clothe us. Everyone benefits whether they eat meat or wear wool or not. They should contribute to the support of these industries. Many of our travelling stock reserves have been described as pristine remnants of grassy box land vegetation and they owe this state to the grazing livestock and board management. In the USA many can no longer afford the luxury of a horse and they are being sent to Mexico to be slaughtered. Maybe they could provide a food source as well as pleasure here if sheep and cattle populations decline further.
Posted by Common Cents, 4/09/2008 10:29:51 AM
Forget the sentimentality of animal lovers or the guff on locking up carbon, it's emotional and has no place in an economic debate. Racing and competition horses are an industry like sheep and beef not some warm feel good soft fuzzy pet establishment.

If an industry imports or transports a commodity (horses) to or from destinations which pose a risk to that industry and its subsidiaries then the industry should foot the bill to better manage its QA and quarantine practices.

Posted by Realist, 4/09/2008 12:33:25 PM
AQIS did slip up but however good they are there is no 100% security. The racehorse industry insists on the risky traffic in horses: some stallions would have more frequent-flyer points than a federal politician. Import semen for breeding, and the risk drops a magnitude.
Posted by rational, 4/09/2008 1:13:50 PM
So what other industries pay a disease levy? As a cattle producer I don’t. Do we pay for Dogs or Pigs? The majority of these live in the wild and cannot be taxed. Most of the rest are not on any taxable list. The whole concept is a Canberra bureaucrat's dream!
Posted by Peter Williams, 4/09/2008 2:29:47 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Is there a future for young people in agriculture?

Yes
(63.4%)

No
(30.9%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 722
Poll Date: 31 August, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...