News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Govts buy NSW cotton farm to help save Macquarie Marshes 

Govts buy NSW cotton farm to help save Macquarie Marshes

07 Aug, 2008 12:53 PM
Federal and state governments have bought 2436 hectares of a cotton farm in the Macquarie Marshes and all its water licences in an effort to salvage the stricken wetland.

The farm, Pillicawarrina Station, was allowed to develop into a cotton-growing enterprise in the 1980s despite its location in the heart of the internationally-recognised wetland.

As with much of the Murray-Darling Basin, the wetland is in crisis.

The land will be added to the Macquarie Marshes nature reserve system, increasing its size by about 10pc, while 8658 megalitres of water will go back to the environment, ending Pillicawarrina's days as an irrigation cotton farm.

Locals say the farm would have cost at least $10 million.

In a very rare event for the marshes, it was welcomed by all sides of the ferocious water debate that has raged there for decades.

The federal Water Minister, Penny Wong, said the marshes were in poor shape due to a lack of flood water and she was determined to help rescue them "after 12 years of inaction under the previous government".

The NSW Environment Minister, Verity Firth, said, "The Iemma Government has already purchased 15,000 megalitres of general security water entitlement for the Macquarie Marshes and expects to hold at least 30,000 megalitres by the end of this year.

"These entitlements allow us to orchestrate flood events in the marshes that provide a lifeline to the wetland ecosystem."

Richard Kingsford, a wetlands expert with the University of NSW, said the buy was "fantastic", helping bridge a gap between the north and south marsh nature reserves, established in 1900.

"It was always a worry that there was a major irrigation area in the middle of the marshes," he said.

However, restoring the land to its natural state would be a "major challenge".

In the Macquarie, 24pc of surface water has been diverted and the CSIRO has found the average period between important inundation events for the marshes has more than doubled since the construction of Burrendong Dam in the 1960s allowed irrigation to flourish along the river.

Buying Pillicawarrina will not instantly return water to the marshes as its entitlement is mostly general security, and there is a zero allocation of general security water because Burrendong is only 18pc full.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So, as farmers, we should all be very afraid.

It's pretty clear that productive agriculture of any type ranks a long way behind perceived environmental benefits.

Next, grazing will be banned from any country adjacent to waterways.

Cultivation will require a permit & forget about destroying native animals that eat your pastures & crops.

They now have more of a right to it than your stock do.

Posted by trev, 7/08/2008 9:52:13 PM
This is great news, and congratulations to the NSW and federal ministers!

That cotton farm is a gaping sore in the middle of what should be a wetland. The nearby town showed no benefit from it.

Contrary to Trev's opinions above, the removal of excess irrigation from the rivers will be a benefit to the remaining farmers, providing more reliable flows and cleaner water.

Without the environment there is no economy.

Posted by Barney, 8/08/2008 9:22:41 AM
About time someone woke up and did something constructive...why the hell would anyone that lived in the world's driest continent want to grow bloody cotton when it demands such a high intake of water...next step should be the rice growers...let asia grow rice...they have been doing it for centuries and they have the rainfall.

Trev, I have a large property that is overgrown with cyprus that I'm not allowed to clear, and now I read where they are going to tax us for cattle farts...what about the population in cities...they must far outweigh the farting compacity of cattle...or don't city people fart!!

I can see where your coming from too Trev. Australia needs to wake up to itself and look after the farmers. The greenies have too much of a say!! But I have to agree with what they are doing about the cotton.

Posted by Sparky, 8/08/2008 10:40:58 AM
As an alternative crop with no or very littel use of pesticides and insecticides, and with atleast 20pc less water usage requirements, surely the industrial hemp plant deserves a mention.

And no, it is NOT the same plant as its cousin, the marijuana plant. It has almost zero content of the psychoactive ingredient 'THC' and will actually cross polinate with a marijuana crop thereby reducing the marijuana's potency.

Pretty stupid idea to sneak a marijuan crop in amongst a hemp crop!!!

Ask around, read, educate yourselves and you will be surprised what one plant can be used for.....you would also be pleasantly surprised to learn that there are actually hemp shops that DO NOT sell smoking paraphernalia.

Posted by 4hemp, 8/08/2008 7:56:00 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 03 August, 2008

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...