News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Iraq payments were approved at top level: AWB 

Iraq payments were approved at top level: AWB

11 Sep, 2009 05:35 AM
HOW much the Howard government knew about AWB Ltd's payments to Saddam Hussein's regime will be scrutinised in a shareholder class action starting in November.

Lawyers for the grains exporter told the Federal Court yesterday its defence would include proving that the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade knew that "transport fees" were going to the Iraqi government while United Nations sanctions were in place.

A barrister for AWB, Matthew Darke, said the 2006 inquiry into the kickbacks scandal headed by Terence Cole, QC, had concluded there was no "direct" evidence the department knew about the fees.

But Mr Cole's investigation "may have been somewhat limited because he concluded it was outside his terms of reference to consider whether any officer of the Commonwealth or the Commonwealth itself had contravened any law," Mr Darke said.

AWB disclosed some of its tactics for the $100 million damages suit yesterday during a pre-trial debate over whether a federal intelligence agency, the Office of National Assessments, was entitled to avoid producing documents to the court on national security grounds.

Justice Lindsay Foster asked if AWB would argue that "these so-called transport fees were a mask for what was in effect a bribe".

"No, because we don't accept that they were in fact a bribe," Mr Darke replied.

"We do say that the department knew they were being paid to [Jordanian transport company] Alia and knew that Alia had a close connection with the Iraqi government," he said.

The investors allege that they suffered losses when the Cole commission exposed the payments. They claim this damage would not have occurred if AWB had not concealed the nature of the payments from officials because ministerial permission for its wheat shipments to Iraq would not have been given.

Officials did know and permission "was granted anyway", Mr Darke said.

Justice Foster asked Mr Darke to speculate whether the shareholders might call "the minister" to give evidence.

Mr Darke said no outline of proposed evidence from "the minister" had been filed. Neither named the former foreign affairs minister Alexander Downer.

Lawyers for the shareholders, who were not involved in yesterday's hearing, have previously told the court they intended to call a senior foreign affairs official, Robert Bowker; a former senior Austrade official, Alistair Nicholas; Alia's general manager, Othman Al-absi; and five former AWB executives.

Justice Foster is expected to rule on whether ONA must produce the documents next week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Part of the text of Fr Frank Brennan's AGM Address Nov 29 , 2007 at the Law Institute of Victoria referring to the AWB affair. The title was: 'Lawyer's Role in Defending and Challenging the Rule of Law in a Democracy'.

The public is left with the perception that in a Royal Commission, lawyers (even senior counsel) have no duty other than the representation of their client's perceived self interest even if such representation involves material misrepresentation of the facts and even if the lawyers know of and facilitate their clients' dishonesty before the commission.

In such a commission, do we as a profession have a duty to the commission and to the public? Or are we simply well-paid, clever people available to dishonest clients assisting them to hoodwink and misguide the Commission and the public?

Posted by Robert Stewart, 11/09/2009 10:08:34 AM
You have it all in the last paragraph, Robert. Regrettably lawyers are not just well paid, they are grossly overpaid. An ambit claim by rich people was made against us. We employed a lawyer for as long as we could afford to. At one time, I told our lawyer that he was costing 12 sheep and hour and that if we employed him for 100 hours, then all the sheep would be gone.

It took five years, without a lawyer, to beat the claim. I showed that the claimants were corrupt. They employed some of the best Law firms in Perth who must have known the facts but were quite happy to pursue us for a fee, a fat fee no doubt.

It cost us the farm to defend ourselves. We were told we didn't have enough money to counter-sue, a six figure sum was needed.

I for one will be surprised if anything comes out of the whole AWB thing. There is a big difference between what Cole found and wrote in his findings and a successful prosecution.

The difference is overpaid lawyers happy to milk the cash cow until the lactation finishes. Mind you, some 'rich cows' never run dry. Too frightened that the truth will be revealed and the milk found to be sour.

Posted by Roger Crook, 14/09/2009 7:47:31 AM
Considering nobody is going to be charged over this corruption - who cares!
Posted by tigerdicky, 14/09/2009 8:49:25 AM
Well, Tigerlilly, you should. One day you might need a lawyer. You might be innocent or as guilty as hell, but you will need an expensive lawyer who can argue and make the whole thing, long, complicated and too expensive for your accusers. You will then get away it.

Even better, if you are a director of a public company, then the shareholders will pay the lawyer. Should we be worried about corruption? Judging by the tone of your letter, apparently not!

Posted by Roger Crook, 15/09/2009 5:57:18 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Is it worth paying higher prices for 'free range' produce?

Yes
(39.9%)

No
(55.9%)

Undecided
(4.2%)

Total Votes: 589
Poll Date: 06 September, 2009
BLOGS
09 September, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...