News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Just how fast is the climate changing? 

Just how fast is the climate changing?

14 Jan, 2010 01:14 PM
CLIMATE change has a speed: about 420 metres per year. That's the average rate at which temperature zones will shift across global landscapes during this century, according to research led by the Carnegie Institute in the United States.

It is also an estimate of how quickly plants and animals will need to move to stay within current climatic zones, and an indication of the pressure on agriculture to adapt as seasonal conditions shift.

Recently published in the scientific journal Nature, the research attempts to predict "temperature velocities" as a way of expressing how climate change will influence plants and animals adapted to certain climatic zones.

Such work is not entirely new, according to Professor Barry Brook, who occupies the Sir Hubert Wilkins Chair of Climate Change at Adelaide University, but it does provide a useful picture of how climate change may advance across landscapes - including farmland.

Unlike plants and animals, which must move or evolve to survive climate shifts, agriculture can adapt relatively quickly on the spot.

The challenge, Prof. Brooks said, was in deciding when to shift enterprises or methods as a result of a climate shift. Moving too early, or too late, could be extremely costly.

"The decision framework about when to make those changes, how quickly, and how we adapt, will be very challenging," Prof. Brook said.

"I think there will be a lot of learning by doing and copying the experience of people who do it successfully."

Making a decision first requires acknowledgement that there is an issue to respond to. That might be the most difficult step of all, Prof. Brook observes.

"This kind of climate system has a lot of natural variability, so people don't recognise the change in one direction or another; or they may not identify it as a trending change, because change is detected over decades rather than years."

"It can be hard to make decisions on that basis, and I don't envy anyone who has to do so."

The scientists from the Carnegie Institution, Stanford University, the California Academy of Sciences, and the University of California who collaborated on the "temperature velocity" work don't make decisions any easier: they acknowledge that their interpretation, which combines current knowledge on global temperature gradients with climate model projections for the next century, contains a number of assumptions and caveats.

However, the scientists also say that the end result in several respects mirrors what is empirically known about recent and prehistoric climate-forced natural migrations.

Their Nature paper, "The Velocity of Climate Change", puts the global average temperature velocity at about 420 metres per year, but with extreme variations according to the landscape.

In hilly or mountainous areas, where species can stay within their climatic zone by gaining altitude, temperature velocities are low.

In flat regions, such as the deserts, grasslands and coastal plains that characterise much of the Australian landscape, temperature velocities may be more than a kilometre per year.

Prof. Brook suggests that despite the increased velocity of change on flat country, species in these areas may adapt to increased temperatures better than those adapted to cold conditions, who may have "no more cold to go to".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Sure, they reckon the Tropics are moving South here in Australia . . . But Climate Change also has Reverse in her gearbox, when you consider the Bitterly Cold Winter in North America, and Europe is concerned !! Turtles are being pulled from the Water half frozen.
Posted by Speedy Gonzales, 14/01/2010 3:23:38 PM
For every Ice age there will be a 'hot age' & along with that hot age, will come the transfer of power among species. The only species that will not suffer as much are the ones with a artificial environment & which is already being self dominated. That will be humans.
Posted by Atheistno1, 15/01/2010 4:45:44 AM
Thats a shift of 42 kilometres in 100 years. A queensland marine stinger expert warned just recently that the box jelly fish would move 500 kilometrs to the Gold Coast in the near future due to global warming. All the scare mongerers need to line their stories up together because otherwise it just makes them look like fools.
Posted by enqu, 15/01/2010 7:44:08 AM
Thats about half the rate at which the waistlines of Australians have been moving east-west every year. If this continues at the current rate, hommo australis wont have to worry about the effects of climate change much longer, as we will soon become hommo australis self extinctus. Maybe the climate change debate is a convenient way for us all to forget the other issues that equally threaten our quality and longevity of life. Climate change is happening but the cause is debateable. In the meantime, it would appear the moguls with vested interests, have realised they stand to make far more money out of climate change scaremongering, than they could ever make addressing health and other social issues which have the same potential (as climate change) to destroy our way of life in future years. Peter Saunders Cassilis
Posted by Peter, 15/01/2010 8:20:03 AM
The science and the calculations can be spot on. But the output result will be meaningless. If the basic input assumptions are flawed. What assumptions were used as to the amount and rate of overall temperature change. What assumptions were made as to what was driving that change, and whether or not it will continue to drive in a single direction, and at a constant speed.
Posted by Qlander, 15/01/2010 8:46:16 AM
SO in 100 years our zone will have moved 42kls. What in blue blazes is that going to mean - Our current migratory birds will have to fly another couple of hours, penquins will have less of a walk to water, Sydney will have either Gosford or Wollongong weather, Canberra will have - who cares - What a load of bull. Who put up the sponsorship money for this research. Or is it purely an investment to have a global 'Climate Change Tax' ( CCT ) imposed on us. As for the comments of timing in when to move an enterprise, Climate isn't going to be the factor. As many businesses are out of business inside 10 years, they aren't going to fret over 4.2kl (420 metres times 10 years for the professor). Fancy creating a chair for climate change If this is where research money is going to produce idiotic findings which can have no predictive outcome, as weather has been variable for thousands of years. No wonder we had a GFC if this is the level of activity our white cells are put to.
Posted by gordons, 15/01/2010 8:48:00 AM
This would nearly take the cake for most moronic bit of climate spin. A temperature zone incorporates a fairly wide range of natural variation in temperature. This variation can be as much as 30C in a single day. Yet these bogans would have us believe there is some sort of clearly defined boundary to a zone that will move across the landscape. The reality is that the edges can be extremely fuzzy and involve a very high degree of overlap. And the greater the normal range of temperature variation within that zone the wider the zone of overlap will be. They can be more than 100km wide or as narrow as a vertical cliff face. In this context, a 420 metre annual movement in what is nothing more than a line of best fit is meaningless. It is only 4.2km per decade or 42km per century and even then it is rendered irrelevant by the nearest mountain, lake or other significant geographical feature. These people will do anything for a headline and a bucket of your money.
Posted by Ian Mott, 15/01/2010 9:24:31 AM
I know KRudd thinks he is the next best thing to 'GOD' but really does he think he has the power to change the climate. Stay at the cricket Kev mate you have more chance at picking the winner there.
Posted by Amused, 15/01/2010 9:30:30 AM
It's so easy to pour abuse on to an idea, when you don't understand it. Characteristically, Mott abuses the scientists, but misses the point entirely, and it's an important point. Australian arid-zone wheat scientists, and Australian forestry scientists, have been studying the 'velocity' of climate change for decades, because farmers and forest managers need to be able to plan their activities. It's not about non-existent boundaries, it's about climatic zones, which may be changing, moving north or south, faster than - for example - a forest can keep up.
Posted by nico, 15/01/2010 5:10:37 PM
You are not surprised, nico, and neither am I or anyone else, that old Motty misses the point. He is intellectually and emotionally incapable of applying a rational thought process to any issue. I think it is a Queensland thing, you know, Joh, Hanson, Katter, Joyce etc.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 18/01/2010 8:02:25 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
13 January, 2010
14 January, 2010
POLL
Q: Does the 'catastrophic' fire warning unnecessarily inflate bushfire danger?

Yes - it is over used and its meaning diluted
(61.8%)

No - it truthfully represents danger and should not be ignored
(28.3%)

I don't know what it really means
(9.9%)

Total Votes: 212
Poll Date: 13 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...