News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Lack of water data puts northern food bowl on hold 

Lack of water data puts northern food bowl on hold

09 Feb, 2010 06:53 AM
SAFE drinking water should be secured for people across northern Australia before the nation tries to turn the Top End into the food bowl of Asia, a taskforce has told the Federal Government.

The Northern Australia Land and Water taskforce, charged with investigating the potential to develop the vast, wet region, urged caution because too little was known about the area.

The taskforce tried to dampen enthusiasm for large, short-term agricultural development, but said a lack of data prevented it from categorically approving or ruling out many of the long-held ambitions for the north.

The region, which has very high, but seasonal, rainfall, has long been coveted by the agricultural sector and has been touted as a possible water source for drying cities in the south.

But without better understanding the region, Australia could not afford to rush its development, said the taskforce chairman, Joe Ross.

''We can't repeat the mistakes of the past … we need to be sure that development in any form is sustainable.''

While urging caution over agricultural expansion, Mr Ross said there were opportunities to increase farming.

''It is possible for quite large growth in horticultural and agricultural industries, but in a smaller mosaic-style framework.''

The broadacre style of farming common in the south was unlikely to be sustainable in the north.

The president of the National Farmers' Federation, David Crombie, said northern Australia would not be a food bowl on the scale of the Murray-Darling Basin, but it had great potential.

Mr Ross conceded the lack of data meant the report could not categorically debunk calls for water from the north to be used to meet demands in the south.

The taskforce did not commission any new data on the region's water systems to inform its report, relying instead on one CSIRO study and a collation of existing environmental studies.

Mr Ross said the report was at least fostering ''rational debate'' about the region's future.

The taskforce, which included representatives of farming, mining, indigenous and environmental interests, urged the government to urgently improve drinking water supplies and improve research. In response, the government indicated it was keen to expand farming and research in the region.

The Parliamentary Secretary for Northern Australia, Gary Gray, said the government would seek to double or triple the region's agricultural and horticultural production. The Water Minister, Penny Wong, said $2.4 million would be spent on research.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
NO NO AND NO. If CHINA needs food they should grow food for themselves. WE AUSSIES need food too and water to turn the Top End into the food bowl of Asia, a taskforce has told the Federal Government.
Posted by are theyinlovewithasia, 9/02/2010 12:11:15 PM, on Stock & Land
How bogged can a bureaucracy get? If they don't know anything about the place they should ask the people who live there. But they couldn't do that, because it might cut costs.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 10/02/2010 7:52:45 AM, on The Land
Safe drinking water for the north? Hasn't Joe Ross and his ignorant mates even heard of the rainwater tank yet? You know, the ones that just about every farmer in the country has been using for the past century. This simplistic, and yes, moronic, article has clearly been written by urban punters for Fairfax's metropolitan readers and then recycled to rural readers without a thought for its relevance to a much more informed audience. Once again we have sloppy journalism, giving the green argument most of the coverage with a token one-liner from a contrary source. A journo even partially up to speed on these issues would have asked Ross what could possibly by "unsustainable" about an initial irrigation allocation, just to get the ball rolling, of 1% of mean annual runoff? This mean annual runoff is not in dispute at 200,000GL. Yes folks, thats 200 million megalitres, and 1% of it is 2 million megalitres. And as irrigation would be used to extend the existing 6.5ML/hectare of annual soil absorption, it may only need another 5Ml -10ML/ha to finish a crop. So there is no doubt at all that an initial 200,000 - 400,000 hectares could be irrigated from just a 1% allocation.
Posted by Ian Mott, 10/02/2010 10:27:54 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Note how the associated article giving the alternate farmers view is only a fraction of the size of this one. Again, it is short on the detail that completely debunks the Rudd/Ross position. And as at 9.36am, it doesn't even have provision for commentary. So who was it decided to turn rural news services into a dumping ground for gonzo second hand urban journalism?
Posted by Ian Mott, 10/02/2010 10:38:16 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Ian, a glitch occured in our system that we only discovered earlier this morning defaulting the ability for readers to comment to 'off' for some of our stories. Rest assured we are working on rectifying the situation.
Posted by Mitchell Vleeskens on 10/02/2010 10:54:40 AM
...what a pity we did not use the same insight before we sucked the Murray Darling dry. It is so good that they have stopped handing out water licences and daming the rivers in this basin. Oh and that national water scheme is a belter, how great is the immediate effect it has had on restoring the Lower Lakes and the general health of the system from the mouth up. Ooops, sorry about that, must have been dreaming. What hypocrites. If we let this lot at it they will stuff it all up. Get them away form there now!!! Well spotted Motty, interesting reply Mitchell. I guess when we all see full and robust reporting across all the topics we may all become a little less cynical.
Posted by katandra, 10/02/2010 3:09:16 PM, on Stock Journal
Most of the backer of the global warming hoax also are after population reduction. Having vast amounts of food being made available through northern development is against their evil agenda.
Posted by Len, 10/02/2010 5:50:57 PM, on Farm Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
The Ord River in northern WA.
The Ord River in northern WA.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Rural Bookshop
 
S&L Twitter
 
photo gallery
 
S&L Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...