News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Last rites for stricken Murray River lakes 

Last rites for stricken Murray River lakes

07 Aug, 2008 07:12 PM
The Murray River's lower lakes appear to be beyond salvation, according to federal Water Minister Penny Wong.

Signalling that the Rudd Government has all but given up on saving the drought-stricken lakes, Senator Wong said yesterday a final decision on whether to inundate them with seawater would be taken within months.

"Unfortunately, there's just not enough water to do everything we want, so the priority has to be critical human needs," Senator Wong said.

The comments came this week, after the South Australian Government reluctantly began laying the groundwork to abandon the lakes, authorising $30 million to be spent on preparatory works for a weir to protect the river when the lakes are inundated.

Lying near the mouth of the Murray in SA, the lakes have been listed as internationally protected wetlands.

They host a large number of plants, animals and migratory birds.

The prospect of inundation has provoked dismay among locals and scientists, who want the Federal Government to save the lakes by buying more water from upstream irrigators.

Langhorne Creek winemaker John Pargeter, whose property adjoins Lake Alexandrina, said the beginning of works on the weir, combined with Senator Wong's comments, did not bode well.

"It's a nail in the coffin for the lower lakes," he said.

"If we don't get water very, very shortly it will be the death of the lower lakes."

Neil Shillabeer, who chairs a community group at Meningie on Lake Albert, disputed Senator Wong's claim that there was not enough water to save the lakes.

He said the issue was the "preparedness or not of people to give up water".

SA Premier Mike Rann said the weir would be built only as a last resort to safeguard drinking water.

"Do we want to build a weir? No," he said.

Federal Opposition water spokesman Greg Hunt urged the Government to think carefully before "destroying the freshwater ecology of the lower lakes for a generation, a half-century or perhaps even a century".

Peter Cosier, of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, said it would be a sad day if the lakes were inundated.

"The advice I have is once the salt water's in there, it is next to impossible to get it out."

But grape grower Tom Keelan saw both sides.

"Unfortunately, something has to happen, and a weir is really the only option left, to protect Adelaide's water supply," he said.

The SA Government's adviser on drought, former Liberal premier Dean Brown, said the fate of the lakes depended on rainfall over the next two months.

"There's a 50pc chance that there might be enough flow in the river and enough flow into the lakes to maintain the level where it is," Mr Brown said.

A meeting of federal and state water ministers is due to decide the fate of the lakes in October.

Any decision to introduce salt water into the lakes would be made by SA, but federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett would need to formally approve.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Peter Andrews put it best, as part of his Natural Sequence Farming system - all the talk about Pratt & co. building pipelines from northern Australia and bringing river water down. Send it down a pipeline already in place - the Darling River. Then there would be more than enough for everyone.

Australia hasn't got the will anymore to tackle the big issues. Am I wrong? Prove it.

Posted by mbh, 8/08/2008 8:16:33 AM
Minister Peter Garrett once sang a song called "Short Memories".

The aboriginal word Meningie means "mud". Maybe, just maybe in the last 40 000 years it looked like this. As for the saltwater being impossible to remove - for goodness sake the weirs have not always been there! Bbring on the salt water.

Posted by Mud man, 8/08/2008 8:44:10 AM
False Hope & Denial To Whom It May Concern: To whom may be interested:

Why is it we in SA just want to continually blame others for the situation we often find ourselves in. We won the contest with Victoria on the air-warfare destroyer contract. We occasionally win the AFL contest We produce the best wines in the country We even sleep in for half hour more than the Eastern states.

Yes we do have a water shortage problem, and yes we are running hard to do a catch up - or are we really running hard too little too late?

Yes, there were some storms in the upper Darling river catchments from Dec to March last summer and yes Menindee lakes went from 26 gigs to 603gigs by end of April. SA actually got a bonus out of that event and was able to store some water that would have evaporated in Lake Menindee if it had tried to go past the 640gig stage.

This is where responsible management gets overlooked by the media (or they just don’t know). Yes, there were some diversions by communities at the top end of the system, but they had not seen water for 3 and in some cases 5 to 6 years.

How much went past their pumps and how much made it to the Murray?

There are some pretty reliable numbers on record, too much to quote here, but cast your mind back to the Catalyst & Land Line programs of late April 2008 and try to remember the amount of water that crossed the border from Queensland to NSW and then view the Paroo and Warrego systems outflows and where that water ended up.

Almost 3,000gigs crossed the border, nothing from the Paroo even reaching the Darling and about 10pc of the Warrego flow reaching Menindee lakes.

Most of the water that reached the Lakes originated out of northern NSW and south-eastern Queensland. Approx just over 400 gigs, and this is water that made it past the pumps we are accusing of taking it all.

Has anyone visited these sites to view how what is taken is measured at the point of extraction, based on their current license laws, and any delivery or evaporation losses are borne by the customer. Much more can be said and quoted, but at the end of the day unless we are prepared to change how we manage our own system to avoid these major losses. No one in the north or east are going to feel-sorry for the plight that SA finds itself in.

- Ray Najar, general manager, Murray Darling Association.

Posted by Riverlander, 8/08/2008 9:33:11 AM
Our river system has supported our economic growth for too long. With the dairy industry using so much of the irrigated water, it is no wonder that it is drying because most of our milk is being sent overseas! It takes up to 600 litres to produce one litre of milk overall! How can the waters keep flowing in a drought if all this virtual water is sent overseas?
Posted by Milly , 8/08/2008 10:08:50 AM
Editor's note: Milly, not sure where you are getting your statistics - can you verify your claim about 600 litres of water per litre of milk produced. It does not sound accurate.
Posted by Michael Thomson on 8/08/2008 11:11:54 AM
if every house in adelaide had a rainwater tank there wouldn't be such a huge problem.
Posted by Kylie, 8/08/2008 10:10:54 AM
A different but totally related issue - in a few year's time politicians will be mandating that every tree planted for crazy carbon offset schemes in the MDB catchment be pulled out because they take all the water and provide no jobs. This is only the start of the water worries that will happen everywhere if we continue with this tree planting frenzy that simply allows consumers to feel all moralistic about buying the new car/ holiday/ TV etc. We all have to learn to live with less.
Posted by carbon policy stupidity, 8/08/2008 11:00:53 AM
How dare she say that when we all know the solution is to get all states to work and share the water flow. And she was not good enough to get an agreement among ALL the labor states. Politics are our main problem to fix the Murray. The three-year life of parliament means politicians are all taking a Band-Aid approach. Even Karlene "pray for rain" Maywald has been taxing South Australians over $40 million the last two years for this "save the Murray" fund and they still don't have answers. Where"s that money?? Private Industry has to fix this problem and it is going cost money.

We need to consider relocating water from the north of Australia to Southern Australia either by piping or open channels whatever is the best way. The Ord River dam alone could drought proof Perth and South Australia. Perth did it in the 1930s for Kalgoolie. That Parliment had more vision than we have now.

Rainfall in Tully and surrounding areas could be piped into South East Qld and the headwaters of the Darling to eventually flow into the middle and lower reaches of the Murray keeping the majority of irrigators afloat and save these Murray River towns.

As a South Australian, it is just horrible to see the effects on the lakes of Alexandrina and the Coorong.

We need politicians with better vision than we have now. The cost of water will increase but that is better than no water at all. I would be interested in others' opinions

Posted by Rob, 8/08/2008 11:12:23 AM
The high rainfall areas in north queensland have water but why spend billions on piping water to the south when it can be much better economically used in north and central Queensland?

Also, the Tully and Russell rivers would have to have dams, so the environmental changes would also have to be approved by society first.

The reality is that it makes the most economic and envirnomental sense to change the lakes to sea water. Better to do it now than waste millions trying to put off the ineveitable.

Posted by terry, 8/08/2008 2:26:04 PM
I have had my say many times on the tragedy of the Murray - to politicians and to newspapers. The utter stupidity and greed of government and industry to allow this to happen is beyond comprehension.

How absolutely idiotic does Australia look now - to ruin a river system over the course of a few decades while those in power stand wringing their hands.

They either don't understand or don't wish to accept - this is an arid country. Not everything can be grown or reared.

Posted by O. Parkes, 9/08/2008 10:03:53 AM
Good to see the Murray/Darling People comment on this site. The NSW and Federal Governments have just bought a Cotton Property in the Macquarie Marshes. This I believe will see 1000's of Megalitres back in the River System (when it next rains) instead of being used for cotton.

Why do all Governments turn a blind eye to Cubbie Station in Queensland? Is it because a Former Labour Treasurer is running the Company? Why cannot the Queensland and Federal Governments buy, or at the very least determine that enough is enough, and for the NATION'S INTEREST declare that Cubbie's days of wholesale water retention is cut or exhausted completely.

Thats my say, but I am only one . . . .

Posted by DavMac, 9/08/2008 10:07:27 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Lake Albert (left) and Alexandrina show the effects of drought. Photo: David Mariuz.
Lake Albert (left) and Alexandrina show the effects of drought. Photo: David Mariuz.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 03 August, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
S&L Twitter
 
photo gallery
 
S&L Facebook


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...