News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Milk wars can't last 

Milk wars can't last

29 Dec, 2011 03:00 AM
AFTER provoking almost a year of controversy and friction, Australia's $1-a-litre supermarket milk price war can't last for too much longer says Westpac senior commodities specially, Neil Burgess.

The price battle, which began as a Coles initiative on Australia Day has been blamed for a big slump in milk sales from convenience stores and milk vendors as well as indirectly driving down farmgate payments to dairy farmers whose contracts were re-negotiated this year.

It also sparked a Senate inquiry into the impact of the big supermarket duopoly pricing tactics on farmers, other retail competitors and milk processing companies.

Japanese parent company of Australia's biggest milk processor, Kirin Holdings, is blaming the discount war, now involving all supermarket "house brands", as a major contributor to its projected net loss in its milk business this year.

Kirin owns the Lion beverage group, including the former National Foods dairy products stable which became Australia's biggest milk processor after buying the Dairy Farmers co-operative in 2008.

Westpac's Mr Burgess said although processors used high volume supermarket supply contracts for generic milk to keep their bottling plants running at maximum capacity and providing a consistent market for all the milk their suppliers delivered, he believed economic reality had to kick in eventually.

"Supermarket private label milk contracts might be keeping the infrastructure working, but it's also squeezing processors' own valuable brands out of the market - brand names that are meant to be worth a lot of money to these companies," he said.

Milk processing costs were also rising, particularly energy costs.

"With only two main processors operating in eastern Australia (Lion and Parmalat), its not hard to see the point where they turn to Woolworths and Coles and say this situation can't continue.

"And, although I'm not privy to the numbers the supermarkets work with to cover their own costs, I'm sure economic commonsense would suggest they can't afford to carry the $1 a litre price for much longer, either.

"Coles even told the Senate hearing that while it's private label milk discount was commitment for a six months, the price would eventually rise.

"It probably depends on how long the supermarkets have their current contracts locked in with the processors."

Coles argues its decision to slash milk prices as much as 33 per cent in January has actually been good for the dairy industry, lifting consumption in most States in the nine months to September.

Victorian milk sales were up 4.9pc, followed by Western Australia (4.5pc), and Queensland (3.6pc), but NSW and Australian Capital Territory sales were less impressive - up just 0.8pc.

Milk consumption in South Australia and Tasmania and the Northern Territory actually fell 0.2pc in the year to September and UHT also fell 9.3pc nationally, but overall September milk sales in Australia were 198.5 million litres or four per cent up on September 2010 .

A Coles spokesman said while not all milk categories were rising, this year's sales figures rebuffed claims that milk was an inelastic product and price cuts wouldn't lead to any sales growth.

However, Mr Burgess noted that unlike Britain where supermarkets invested a lot of effort and money in developing their private labels as mainstream competitors to food company dairy brands, retailers like Coles did not have their own processing plants or close ties with specific processors.

He said UK giant Tesco even paid a modest premium to farmers contracted to supply its supermarkets.

Although Australia's private supermarket labels growth formula was copying a long tradition of home brands in Britain, Mr Burgess believed major processors here seemed much less likely to stay aligned to specific supermarket contracts in the current uneasy market climate.

Australian Dairy Farmers president Chris Griffin said pricing pressure on processors branded milk lines had definitely flowed through to a downward trend in farmgate prices milk companies were offering farmers.

The price war had created a two speed dairy economy, hitting Queensland, WA and northern NSW farmers hardest and depressing product innovation initiatives by the processors.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Hang on didn't the experts say all is well !!!!!
Posted by xd, 29/12/2011 7:27:49 AM
It's simple the processing plants should refuse to renew house brand contracts without significant increases in tow.

Then it becomes irrelivent whether it's house brand or labelled milk the big 2 would have to make a loss to sell it a $1 per litre. To those who may question the logic it's reverse ransom.

If the big 2 don't like it tough someone has to make a stand somewhere. If we all do it then we will have the power back.

Posted by Farmer Greg, 29/12/2011 8:43:26 AM
Perhaps we should be aware that thesupermarkets didn't slash the price of milk so as to more than proportionately increase sales and profit; like bread, milk is a "loss leader" where the small loss due to the price cut is more than offset by the other purchases made by people enticed into the store by the prospect of cheap milk. It's like the advertising designed to exploit family togetherness by inducing children to pressure their parents to buy expensive toys, especially at Christmas and Easter.
Posted by R. Ambrose Raven, 29/12/2011 10:37:29 PM
@ R.Ambrose Raven, the trouble you get into with the loss leader idea is that the next time milk contracts come around the big two cry poor and have the wholesale price knocked down and then jack their price back up!
Posted by Farmer Greg, 30/12/2011 11:33:44 AM
Some UK dairy farmers have been known to sell their milk to Tesco only as a last resort, about 200 UK farmers sell their fresh raw milk direct to consumers adding competition to the retail market.

UK milk consumers can also choose from; Azda, Morrisons, Co-Op, Netto, Waitrose, Marks and Spencer, Sainsburys, Tesco, Aldi, and other smaller super markets to buy their milk from.

Posted by Cattle Advocate, 2/01/2012 8:29:29 PM
Australian dairy farmers could look at the demand for shared house cow programs, where consumers buy shares in a cow and then are supplied with their own milk; while the host dairy farmer milks and maintains the consumer's cow.

Due to public demand; Food Standards Australia New Zealand have created a proposal to assess alternative, feasible safety systems for raw milk and its products that preserve the integrity of the product while maintaining an acceptable level of public heath and safety.

FSANZ will soon post a notice on its website inviting public comment.

Posted by Cattle Advocate, 2/01/2012 8:55:39 PM
If our fresh milk processors have to continue to operate in a hostile enviroment; where the quality of our drinking milk could be compromised, all other possible supply sources should be considered.
Posted by Cattle Advocate, 2/01/2012 9:07:11 PM
The silence from the super fool is deafening.
Posted by Dave, 3/01/2012 4:18:47 PM
With consumers wanting ethically produced food; super market Reps could travel to schools lecturing our kids on what ethics they use when dealing with our farmers and processors.

Our kids will be raising their kids in the global economy.

In 2008, an export baby formula company posioned over 300,000 kids with adulterated formula, there were 6 deaths, and 51,900 hospitalized. The company had received sick baby compaints 9 months before it was made public.

The contaminate was also added to pet food that killed 8500 dogs and cats in the USA by kidney failure.

Posted by Cattle Advocate, 5/01/2012 7:57:00 PM
After the baby formula posionings were made public, Tesco removed suspect products from their UK stores, Cadbury UK also withdrew 11 of its products from sale and 2 USA confectionary makers recalled their products in Indonesia.

In 2011 remanents of the posioned milk powder made its way back onto the market, and 2100 tonnes were confiscated. In 2008, 22 different milk brands were contaminated.

The possible threat of counterfeiting reputable brands using inferior ingredients should also be considered.

Whats ethically good for the goose, should be good for the gander.

Posted by Cattle Advocate, 5/01/2012 8:24:04 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
19 December, 2011
16 December, 2011
27 December, 2011
21 December, 2011
POLL
Q: What did you have as your main meal this Christmas?

Pork
(14.2%)

Ham
(23.6%)

Turkey
(23%)

Chicken
(7.4%)

Beef
(6.1%)

Lamb
(8.1%)

Seafood
(12.8%)

Vegetarian
(2.7%)

Other
(2%)

Total Votes: 148
Poll Date: 28 December, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...