News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Murray flows lowest in a century 

Murray flows lowest in a century

08 Apr, 2009 07:53 AM
THE amount of water flowing into the stricken Murray River between January and March was the lowest for that quarter in the 117 years that records have been kept.

An unprecedented drought has thrown the river system into decline, according to the guardian for the river.

"We've had big droughts before and big floods before, but what we didn't have was climate change," said Rob Freeman, the chief executive of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority .

A second record has been smashed too - for a three-year period.

Water flowing into the system in the three years to March totalled 5160 gigalitres, less than half the previous 11,300 gigalitre minimum during the 1943-46 drought, according to the authority's update.

"It worries me. Normally you break records by small amounts," Mr Freeman said.

As the Bureau of Meteorology predicts more dry weather for the next three months, irrigators have been put on notice that they can expect similar water allocations to the past two years, which means NSW rice growers will get zero and fruit growers who have left trees to die will get no relief unless they buy water.

Wetland ecosystems and floodplains are at further risk and near the Murray mouth in South Australia, the outlook is grim, Mr Freeman said.

"The lower lakes are a worry to all of us. We've had this river on dredges to keep the mouth open since 2002.

"The sea is now higher than Lake Alexandrina … It is something most of us need to be aware of, the dire straits at the bottom of the system," he said.

The soil beneath Lake Albert is turning to sulphuric acid and, although the level of the lake is holding at half a metre below sea level now, further falls could poison the water.

"If it turns acidic, it will destroy the eco-system," Mr Freeman said.

The authority's total usable water storage has dropped to 11pc of capacity, and sluggish flows and hot weather have led to recent outbreaks of blue-green algae in the Murray.

The authority has already foreshadowed that it will allow only minimal water releases during winter, when the chances of a significant improvement in inflows is rated as very low.

However, the Menindee Lakes, which are fed by the Darling River, have had their first significant inflow since March last year.

But this only increased the storage level from 7pc to 15pc.

"Despite the good rainfall in parts of the northern basin during February, particularly near Bourke and Walgett, much of it fell on flat and dry countryside, and did not reach the river system," its update said.

"The situation is not expected to improve until there is a very significant and sustained improvement in rainfall, system inflows and water storage levels," it said.

The authority will deliver 4.4 gigalitres of water to six sites chosen for their high ecological value, including the Koondrook-Perricoota Forest in NSW. The flow will give stressed red river gums a drink and create drought refuge for waterbirds, fish, frogs and turtles, Mr Freeman said.

The government purchase of Toorale station for its water entitlements had resulted in an extra 11 gigalitres of water reaching the Darling River after heavy rains in February, the authority said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Everything in nature is connected to everything else, and nature works in cycles. The current state of the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) is a direct result of an ineffective water cycle.

I am becoming very concerned that the whole MDB debate seems myopically focused on an overly simplistic “release water back into the river” approach, whereas the only real long term answer to the regeneration of the MDB eco-system is restoring the water cycle, by getting the soil surface covered on a massive scale.

Of the current rainfall, 94pc evaporates or transpires, 2pc drains into the ground, and the other 4pc becomes run-off.

Let’s be very conservative and allow that we could reduce the rate of evaporation/transpiration by just 1pc each and every year, or close to 5,000 gigalitres GL) each and every year.

As you know the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists has called for the Government to “guarantee” river flows of 300-400GL to prevent irreversible damage to the Coorong and Lower Lakes. Reducing evaporation by even just 1pc is more than 10 times this amount. Reducing evaporation by even just 1pc is more than 10 times the amount of extra water needed!.

The health of the Coorong and Lower Lakes is inextricably and inversely linked to the degree of bare soil several thousand kilometers north – and unless we get some serious changes in current management, things are not looking good.

Posted by soil carbon, 9/04/2009 7:24:16 AM
I understand that there is still water in the Murray River. In 1914, people were able to drive buggies into the middle of the dry river bed for a picnic. In 1945 the Murray River cease to flow at Echuca. What is the flow like now?
Posted by Len, 9/04/2009 6:00:54 PM
Droughts in Australia are a natural fact, Matthew. Flinders reported drought and bush fires from 1782 to 1792. As did Governor Arthur Phillip and later Governor Macquarie, the Australia-wide drought of 1895 to 1903 lasted 2921 days.

The Australia-wide drought of 1911 to 1916 lasted 1826 days, the drought of 1939 to 1945 lasted 2192 days, to mention just a few. Source: “Australian Drought Records 1857 to 2008” Emergency Management Australia http://www.ema.gov.au/

From between 1885 and 1960 the 3,370 km long Darling River dried up on 48 occasions, long “before” large-scale irrigation. The 1690 km long Murrumbidgee River stopped flowing from 1838 to 1842, and then there was the Federation drought of 1895 to1903.

Google: The Australian Bureau of Statistics "Darling River dried up on 48 occasions".

And The Australian Bureau of Statistics, “The Murrumbidgee River stopped flowing for two years”.

These events clearly show this climate change scam is not about “modern man-made” carbon emissions. It’s about establishing a secret global tax system for a New World Order.

Posted by Bazza, 11/04/2009 5:17:39 PM
Bazza and Len, the reason the river dried up then and not now is simple - dams and weirs! We didn't have them in place then but we do now - so we can control the flow somewhat, if they weren't there we would have dry rivers everytime there was a drought.
Posted by NJ, 6/05/2009 11:01:39 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you think Kevin Rudd needs to eat more red meat?

Yes
(89.4%)

No
(7.5%)

Other
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 548
Poll Date: 05 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...