News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 New drought aid trials "coming soon" 

New drought aid trials "coming soon"

04 Mar, 2010 03:00 AM
THE Federal Government has approved a new drought assistance model and is waiting for State Government agreement before pilot programs and transitional arrangements are rolled out "soon".

While there is still no clear timeframe yet or publicly available model for the Government's much-anticipated drought assistance reforms, Minister for Agriculture, Tony Burke, told this week's ABARE Outlook conference in Canberra the current drought policy settings were only hurting farmers in the long term.

In a frank address to the conference, Mr Burke said some farmers are about to hit the $500,000 ceiling on interest rate subsidies payments under the exceptional circumstances drought arrangements.

These people, he said, would soon be faced with a very tough decision about what to do with their farm – a decision, which they probably should have tackled some years ago, he added.

"They were confronted with a really tough decision, for some of them seven years ago and instead of helping them get out of that, we gave them just enough money to hold them in that precise situation," Mr Burke told the conference.

"They then had seven years on the property where it's not making money, where they’re staying just afloat, and only just afloat.

"And at the end of it, either because they lose their EC declaration or because they reach the maximum of the half a million dollar payment they get told, now you’ve got to make the hard decision that you probably could have made seven years earlier.

"I am not surprised by a whole lot of mental health challenges that we have in this portfolio."

Mr Burke said dealing with the drought reforms needed had been a "taboo" in his portfolio, despite more than 100 farmers privately telling him the assistance was "hurting a lot of people".

"There is no doubt a lot of good has been done by the interest rate subsidy and there is no doubt that for people who are in their current drought it must remain and see them through the current times they are in," Mr Burke said.

"But just think through the logic of that payment. Point one, government support and assistance is conditional upon how much debt you are in.

"If for whatever reason you’ve made some really hard decisions during the good times and are not in debt, your reward for that is to get no government assistance.

"Secondly by virtue of it being an interest rate payment it is effectively a payment to the bank, not to the farmer.

"Now people have locked themselves into those financial arrangements and we’ve got to see the policy through under its current policy settings.

"But I don’t believe for a minute that’s the best way to do things.

"I think we need to be brave enough to acknowledge that just because we are giving people money does not mean that we are doing them a favour."

Mr Burke said the Government now had a preferred model for the reforms and was negotiating at a State level to reach an agreement.

Once that is achieved, a "staged roll-out" with transitional mechanisms will be introduced, with Mr Burke pointing to the merit in the National Farmers Federation proposal for a pilot program in an area out of EC.

Mr Burke would not commit to the reforms being ready by budget time, but says a decision would be made soon.

Mr Burke said the new policy would be tailored to fewer people ever hitting crisis in the first place.

Opposition spokesman for agriculture, John Cobb, said to claim the interest rate subsidy was "illogical" and did "more harm than good" showed Mr Burke was "out of touch" with farmers who have battled more than eight years of drought.

"Even the best farmers have found themselves in debt following three failed wheat crops in a row," Mr Cobb said.

"Without the EC interest rate subsidy it is doubtful whether some farmers would even be able to get carry on finance to plant this years wheat crop or buy sheep or cattle to restock.

"…there would not have been as much wheat grown in eastern Australia and without the 2008 wheat crop Australia would have plunged into a technical recession."

Mr Cobb said the EC payments were not perfect but believes Mr Burke's comments are "a front" to cut funding to regional businesses.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So basically Rudd and Burke will send drought stricken farmers to the wall for their own good. The EC subsidies aren't free 'hand outs' as the criteria to establish viability and to meet the funding approval are extensive. Farming businesses that have endured six years of drought would be viable businesses as assessed under the scheme but due to 'exceptional circumstances' require carry on finance. The best way to help a struggling producer in drought is a cash injection not the proposed glossy brochures which Burke is proposing to replace it with. With the EC axing and the new beef import rules I am starting to think that Mr Rudd only cares about 'working familes' in Labor electorates.
Posted by Tom, 4/03/2010 8:29:07 AM
Now that there has been widespread rain, that small investment by the govt will pay off 10 fold. When there is a dry period as long as we have had, with buggerall crops, less wool, low calf brandings, less fat cattle to sell and a budget impossible to balance, those lump sum interest subsidy payments were what kept a lot of people afloat. This money mostly went to pay for food, fuel etc, which supported businesses in local towns. If Burke thinks that allowing businesses, rural or town, to go under when times are at there worst is a good thing, then he has as much idea of reality as his leader KRudd. If the govt is too short of money to support ordinary hard working Australians who produce most of the nations wealth, then they should stop wasting it on non productive schemes, but I think that would be wishful thinking and impossible for a Labor govt to do.
Posted by R, 4/03/2010 9:18:18 AM
First of all, let's call the interest rate subsidies exactly what they are. BANK SUBSIDIES. If they were farm drought subsidies all farmers in drought areas would receive them. Not just those that have overstretched themselves, for whatever reason. It is time that banks accepted the consequences of their lending policies.
Posted by Qlander, 4/03/2010 10:41:18 AM
While we are going Mr Burke, lets cut some other programs and let people 'make some decisions they should have a long time ago'. First, unemployment benefits - lets not string people out that have lost their job - they should be scabbing through bins for a feed., also that whole age pension thing - it has to go - older people are inefficient, along with government support programs for the car industry, public housing, the education industry, the alternative energy industry, and countless others. As a young farmer I am disgusted at the actions and words of this agriculture minister. I wish you would resign. Mr Burke you have betrayed the trust of many family farmers who have done their best through this terrible drought.
Posted by cannona, 4/03/2010 8:07:42 PM
Is anyone else tired of hearing about ALL the money farmers are CONTINUALLY receiving from the govt? If it's not for growing trees, it's for being in drought; if it's not for selling water, it's for keeping it. Make up your minds, city folk! Personally, I have never been paid by the govt to be a farmer and no, I don't have a second or primary source of income as a lawyer / doctor / consultant. I am a PRIMARY PRODUCER, who with my family, works pretty damn hard and long to try to feed the nation in spite of severe & unpredictable weather & marketing policies. Sounds noble? Well, I pay and I pay and I pay for the right to operate a business in Australia. Yes, it's my choice to do this but when you city green folk want the very best to dine on at the very lowest prices, and then suggest we are being paid to do this, I am insulted. Australian farmers have been proven to be among the most efficient and professional in the world. This does not include those who "do" it as a lifestyle choice or tax dodge. We do it because we love our careers - not for the easy govt handouts. Get your facts straight, Mr Burke. Many are going broke for reasons out of their control.
Posted by MaryMary, 6/03/2010 11:41:29 AM
Well said, cannona! How wonderful to hear from our talented agricultural professionals! I agree with you - we should just stop this nonsense of supporting those in need; those aged persons in our community are just a waste of good resources (forget about their value as volunteers); our veterans are done doing their bit for the country (forget about the moral & ethical lessons we learned from them); and those "losers" who have lost their jobs through redundancy and/or sickness etc (forget about the skills base they often share without pay but for the need to be valued); or the young farmers who are having a go. These younger agriculture professionals have put their social lives pretty much on hold due to work commitments & low returns for produce - often working 100 hours a week as they cannot afford to delegate to an employee as our politicians do. When things go wrong - the buck stops with the farmer. If we based govt support on efficiency alone, then our farmers would be way ahead and our politicians at the bottom of the list; along with our farmer representative bodies. Keep up the good work guys! We need more of you and less of the other.
Posted by Just a young 'un, 6/03/2010 4:15:52 PM
Is there ANYONE in this present government with any skills of ANY kind at all? I am disgusted & offended by Mr Burke's words. Surely he doesn't believe what he is saying? This is incredibly short sighted given the value of agriculture to the Australian economy. Or is the lack of support for farming more in line with the philosophy of this govt concerning private ownership of land? Check the philosophies of Chairman Mao & the Fabian Society in regard to taxes: http://www.fabian.org.au/904.asp and how closely aligned the theories of communism and fabians are.
Posted by Oh please!, 6/03/2010 5:10:37 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 March, 2010
03 March, 2010
POLL
Q: What do you think the outlook for your commodity will be this year?

Highly positive
(6.1%)

Positive
(24%)

Neutral
(34.5%)

Negative
(23.3%)

Highly negative
(12.1%)

Total Votes: 429
Poll Date: 28 February, 2010
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...