News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Remote Australia like a 'failed state' 

Remote Australia like a 'failed state'

15 Sep, 2008 03:34 PM
Misdirected Government policy for the development of inland Australia has left many areas resembling the 'failed states' of the South Pacific, according to a Desert Knowledge Australia report released today.

It says that while remote Australia covers 85pc of the continent and most of the nation's mineral resources, it is home to just 5pc of the population who are facing an impending social crisis.

"As Australians we need to revitalise Remote Australia by radically changing the way we govern and administer it,"Desert Knowledge chairman Fred Chaney said.

The scathing report states there is "clear evidence there is a failed state at the heart of our nation", which, if not addressed, will result in "dire economic, social, cultural, environmental and security consequences for Australia as a whole".

The report singles out a lack of government investment in basic infrastructure and the advocation of outdated land management systems as key areas in need of urgent address.

The report was prepared by remoteFOCUS, a group of concerned Australians with extensive experience in dealing with Remote Australia.

Its report, Revitalising Remote Australia, is being described as a prospectus on how to address the crisis facing Remote Australia and the apparent failure of successive governments - Federal, State and Territory - to achieve their stated goals for the nation's vast remote regions: regions encompassing Australia’s deserts and much of the tropical north.

Mr Chaney said the group wanted a major public discussion involving people from various perspectives and place on how Remote Australia should be administered and actively included in a modern integrated Australian nation.

"We need a national reality check about what is happening in remote Australia and we need new ways of looking at and meeting thi enormous crisis and challenge," Mr Chaney said.

"The social, health and economic challenges facing Indigenous people in remote Australia are amplified by the basic structural and governane failures taking place.

"The underlying way governments are structured, administered and policy is developed for the people and communities of Remote Australia will inevitably lead to incoherent andineffective government engagement in Remote Australia.

"To make a difference creative, workable alternatives need to be developed, and implemented."

* The Revitalising Remote Australia prospectus and details of the on-going community engagement process can be found at www.desertknowledge.com.au/remote FOCUS

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
that's the problem with democracy - too bad if you are quiet minority. better to fix footpaths in sydney for loud majority. these are the people who matter to our politicians.
Posted by damodoyle, 16/09/2008 10:05:13 AM
People in Rural Australia have been saying that this has been the case for more than 20 years and their claims were ignored as we fell further beind our city bretheren. Sadly, I doubt that this report will effect any measurable change because quite simply the majority of city voters and our elected politicians with their city-centric ideology do not care about us at all. Sure we receive the odd bit of patronising lip service, but the reality is that actions speak louder than word and action has been lacking for decades. EVERY FAMILY needs a farmer!
Posted by CQ, 16/09/2008 6:09:11 PM
I believe Labor has a plan for north and inland Australia - depopulate it and turn it into a giant wilderness area .

By not providing basic services that Sydneysiders take for granted, it makes hardship and turns the clock back 100 years

Posted by Richie10, 17/09/2008 10:08:43 PM
Maybe its also a strong message to people, industries and communities in our North to begin fostering a vision that promotes a vibrant future - we cannot hold onto the past. Governments never lead.
Posted by Luke , 17/09/2008 11:30:16 PM
How true Fred Chaney's words are. Our city centric decision makers are arrogant and ill informed on too many occassions.

The Victorian Govt has just rolled a Murray River trust that was setup 107 years ago to service irrigators.

It's not the fact that 107 years of service is any reason to keep it, or that maybe it was time for change.

The standover tactic that was used was completley unjustified and really came down to bullying - because they could!

Decisions that have severe ramifications on some regional communities by some government departments could also be construed as nothing less than bullying too. No consideration is given the impacts some of these decisions have on families and indeed whole communities .

Posted by jackal, 18/09/2008 5:57:26 PM
Governments used to lead Luke. That's how the snowy scheme happened as well as the ord. We need people like David Brand & Charlie Court again.
Posted by THE FARMER, 18/09/2008 11:59:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the Rudd Government has a plan for the future development of inland Australia?

Yes
(7.1%)

No
(89.4%)

Undecided
(3.4%)

Total Votes: 757
Poll Date: 14 September, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...