News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rodeo funding angers animal rights groups 

Rodeo funding angers animal rights groups

06 Jul, 2008 08:35 PM
Animal rights groups are angry the Queensland Government is spending up to $50,000 to promote an event they say is "blatantly cruel".

Animals Australia, representing 40 societies and thousands of supporters, said rodeos were "blood sports" providing entertainment for people while inflicting horrific injuries - and sometimes death - on horses and cattle.

Last week Queensland Premier Anna Bligh announced up to $50,000 for a feasibility study into the promotion and expansion of the Mount Isa Rodeo.

Consultants would attend next month's rodeo as part of the study, due to be completed this year.

Animals Australia executive Wendy Parsons said rodeo animals were tormented into "bucking frenzies" by spurs, electric prods and tight straps.

The Premier "should be ashamed at promoting such cruelty".

Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Queensland media and community relations manager, Michael Beatty, said the society opposed rodeos but they were legal.

"We would prefer the $50,000 came to the RSPCA rather than to any rodeo," he said.

Mr Beatty said calf roping and wild-horse racing should be outlawed immediately. Both will feature at Mount Isa.

"Under the [Animal] Care and Protection Act, if an animal is being mistreated we can charge people but we don't have the resources to get to every rodeo," he said.

Jeanie Walker, whose grandfather, uncle and cousins were rodeo competitors, became an anti-rodeo activist after attending a South Australian event in 2004.

"I was shocked by the blatant cruelty and that rodeos are promoted as family entertainment," she said.

The single mother of three said she had spent $50,000 lobbying against rodeos and had attended four Queensland events to gather evidence which she would send to Ms Bligh and Tourism Minister Desley Boyle.

Australian Professional Rodeo Association manager Steve Hilton said he had seen animals injured so badly they had to be put down.

"We usually try to get them out of the arena before we put them down because it looks bad in front of an audience," he said.

He said the association had appointed an animal welfare officer to enforce its code of practice.

"Animals buck because it's bred into them not because they are being mistreated," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There are many animal abuses here in Australia, and many of them are "legal". This is no indication of how humane and ethical they are. We allow all sorts of slavery, killings and exploitation of animals for food and entertainment and the RSPCA has no jurisdiction to stop it! There is an appalling lack of empathy for animals in our anthropocentric and selfish society.
Posted by animal-lover, 7/07/2008 12:43:19 PM
I have been a spectator and volunteer worker at many rodeos, and have only twice seen animals that had to be put down, it was a very sad time. I have never seen an electric prod used and the 'tight straps' can only be tight enough to be an irritant, if they are too tight, the animals don't buck. The 'bucking frenzy' stops almost as soon as the riders leaves their back. Bucking stock are normally well fed and cared for, they are used to people as they are handled and often become rodeo pets. The riders are the ones who normally finish the rodeo with blood spilt, and even bones broken.
Posted by bango05, 7/07/2008 1:16:28 PM
Rodeo's are not cruel. If people could watch a mob of fresh horses or cattle they will see that these animals buck for fun at their own leisure. The rules of rodeo are all in the animals favour and when you think about it, the bronco or bull only actually works for 8 seconds once a week, the professional bulls might buck out more than once in a weekend. When you compare it to horse racing, you can see which sport is more cruel. every sport involving animals has a group that are cruel and rodeo is no exception, dog racing, horse racing and Pony Club are all guilty along with many cat and dog owners. Animals in the Rodeo are bred for the Rodeo and know their job.
Posted by Dusty gal, 7/07/2008 1:58:31 PM
What a sad indictment of the human animal, Mr Steve Hilton, that the more docile another animal is the more it has to suffer at the hands of human animals.
Posted by slamina evas, 7/07/2008 3:12:14 PM
It is simply outrageous that the Queensland government is to use taxpayers funds to promote cruelty. Shame on Premier Bligh; rodeos are nothing more than demonstrations of cruelty to animals who have no choice about their participation and are goaded into dangerous and painful behaviours. The rodeo "industry" never releases figures on the animals maimed and destroyed in "practice" activities.
Posted by Nicky, 7/07/2008 3:35:46 PM
Here we go again. Animals Australia executive Wendy Parsons is an extremist. Rodeo animals are not tormented at all. In fact the best rodeo bulls are pampered, fed special rations and looked after much better than their paddock domociled brethren. The spurs used in Rodeo are quite dull, do not cut (disqualification occurs if spurs cut the skin) and are as used by many of us on horses whilst going about normal stock mustering duties on properties every day of the week. Rodeo is about maintaining longstanding cattle management & bush skills, providing rural people with entertainment (where there is either very little or none) as well as providing a platform for fundraising for charity. For many communities, the annual rodeo is the only major event and source of entertainment. If you don't like rodeo, that's fine, you don't have to come and watch it. But, just because you choose not to, DO NOT try and force your choice on me or anyone else in the bush who does choose to participate or spectate.
Posted by CQ, 7/07/2008 3:45:36 PM
What's new, these people are always angry. It's what they do, they go around being angry. May-be they need more fibre.
Posted by THE FARMER, 7/07/2008 5:54:34 PM
"Under the [Animal] Care and Protection Act, if an animal is being mistreated we can charge people but we don't have the resources to get to every rodeo," he said. Well, why don't they just make it illegal if the animals are suppose to be protected under the act?
Posted by tucson10, 8/07/2008 6:50:56 AM
The Animal Care and Protection Act is a joke, under Part 3 Division 1 "Prohibited Events", section (e) states that any event that causes an animal pain for the purposes of entertainment is prohibited.

The Act gives examples of causing pain, including 'someone does or attempts to, catch, fight or throw the animal'.

Then it gives an exclusion for rodeos... WHY!

Calf Roping and Steer Wrestling have to be two of the cruelest activities I have seen in the name of entertainment in a "civilised" country.

Without a doubt these activities cause pain, fear and stress to the animals involved.

If you did these things to a dog in your back yard you would be prosecuted, so why is it leagal to do it to a baby animal like a calf at a rodeo.

I am disgusted that people can defend this as entertainment

Posted by behappy, 8/07/2008 8:28:08 AM
Yes, here we go again. What do you want to take away from us now they have taken our bush racing away from us.

Rodeo is about maintaining longstanding bush skills. I have been brought up in the bush this is My sport. We love our animals. I am also the owner of several good bucking horses. They are fed just as good as any other horse.

The other thing is most of the rodeos that are held donate ther proceeds to the local hospital, Royal Flying Doctor, the Ambo's and the like. We do this so they can all keep going and provide us with a service out in the bush.

We just dont walk down the corner to see a doctor. I suggest miss parson you go get a real Job.

Posted by Ray , 8/07/2008 9:19:41 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: How do you rate the effectiveness of the current exceptional circumstances drought assistance program?

Excellent
(8.1%)

Good
(17.2%)

Average
(17.7%)

Poor
(24.7%)

Terrible
(32.3%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 06 July, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Rural Bookshop
 
photo gallery
 
S&L Facebook
 
S&L Twitter


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...