News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rural R&D delivers 11:1 return on investment 

Rural R&D delivers 11:1 return on investment

16 Dec, 2008 12:24 PM
The most comprehensive evaluation of rural research and development ever undertaken in Australia has found an average return of $11 for every one dollar invested by the country's 15 Rural Research and Development Corporations.

RDCs invest around $540 million a year, comprising $325 million from rural industry, via producer levies, and $215 million from the Australian Government.

The evaluation, from the Council of Rural Research and Development Corporations' Chairs (CRRDCC), looked at a sample of 32 randomly selected projects from a pool of 600 and found a minimum average return of $11 was achieved for each dollar invested in 2007 dollars.

"This report shows the Government's rural R&D model is exceeding expectations and delivering benefits not only to the primary industries sector, but also producing other very positive social and environmental benefits way beyond the scope of the original investment," said Enzo Allara, chair of the CRRDCC.

The evaluation also found that just 36 highly successful projects returned $10.5 billion in quantified benefits, made up of $5.5b in direct benefits to the rural sector and $5b in spillover benefits to the wider community.

The $5.5b in direct benefits from these 36 projects - just 6pc of the total project pool - more than pays for the RDCs' entire $4.5b investment in the program's 600 projects over the past 10 years.

The report, Measuring economic, environmental and social returns from Rural Research and Development Corporations’ investment, provides the first year of results from an ongoing evaluation of RDC-managed investments.

"While there are significant environmental and social benefits, because of the difficulty in measuring these effects, these benefits are often undervalued," Mr Allara said.

"However, over the course of this evaluation process, we were able to quantify a number of public benefits including an investment in food safety research led by Meat & Livestock Australia which resulted in $503 million in social and related-industry benefits."

* A copy of the full report is available at the Rural RDC website.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Having quickly read the report I am convinced that the industry members who contribute the majority of funds for this research will be highly offended by these claims. Usually the beneficaries of investment of funds are those providing these funds. In this report it is almost impossible to see where any of the benefits arising from these investments have resulted in a tangible benefit to any producers bottom line. If there were such great benefits why is it that these primary producers have continued to receive declining incomes for many years? It would appear that the benefits have flowed to the community through lower prices, lower risk and returns for commercialisers of the technologies/varieties/processes. I cannot see where any bottom line benefit has flowed to the producers from whom these funds are taken. Surely that was the intention of these levies when they were introduced and agreed by industry bodies.
Posted by bazza, 16/12/2008 12:37:28 PM
I am a firm believer in R + D investment. The government is a significant contributor to the cause and as primary producer I am thankful. R + D has helped us increase yields and efficiencies and is our only hope of competing in world markets. Congratulations to rural researchers you are undervalued and underappreciated. Maybe further investment in rural R + D would be a better response to climate change than just slugging us with more tax!
Posted by Don, 17/12/2008 8:28:35 AM
Bazza, it is a sad fact, taught in every good economics 101, that most returns to rural r&d to not accrue to primary producers. As you note, the intention of levies was to create a return for producers. Good intentions maybe, but misguided at best.
Posted by Frank, 17/12/2008 9:50:48 AM
Bazza & Frank, please read some of the real R&D output before being too depressed. These R&D organisations are vital to our future, we are and need to stay at the forefront of knowledge to be world competitive. With a large slice of our R&D funding coming from the taxpayer we must ensure a wide benefit. In areas such as the great MLA food safety work there is no doubt we are beneficiaries of a consuming public that has confidence in the wholesomeness of our products. These R&D levies are some of the best investments you have made. g
Posted by g, 17/12/2008 10:23:47 AM
Nice to see economists saying good things about rural R&D. How about the government apply the same rigour to road building projects, or increased migration. Every time I read a report about some road project the cost benefit hardly breaks even and then years later you read that the road actually cost more than budgeted. In other words most road projects are very bad investments. Of course, State Governments are cutting rural R&D and spending more on freeways.
Posted by Puzzled, 17/12/2008 10:15:48 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Does your town have an adequate number of doctors to service the population?

Yes
(16.5%)

No
(78.9%)

Undecided
(4.6%)

Total Votes: 544
Poll Date: 14 December, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Rural Bookshop
 
S&L Twitter
 
S&L Facebook
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...