News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Scientist denies cash for climate comment claims 

Scientist denies cash for climate comment claims

16 Feb, 2012 07:00 AM
A PROMINENT Australian scientist has rejected as offensive any suggestion he is doing the bidding of a US climate-sceptic think tank that is paying him a monthly fee.

Confidential documents leaked from inside The Heartland Institute, a wealthy think tank based in Chicago and Washington, detail strategy and funding for an array of activities designed to spread doubt about climate change science, paid for by companies that have a financial interest in continuing to release greenhouse gases without government interference.

Among the recipients of funding is Professor Bob Carter of James Cook University, a geologist and marine researcher who spoke at the ''convoys of no confidence'' protests against the carbon price last year alongside the Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, and writes columns for News Ltd newspapers.

The documents show Professor Carter receives a ''monthly payment'' of $US1667 ($1550) as part of a program to pay ''high-profile individuals who regularly and publicly counter the alarmist [anthropogenic global warming] message''.

Professor Carter did not deny he was being paid by The Heartland Institute, but would not confirm the amount, or if the think tank expected anything in return for its money.

''That suggestion is silly and offensive - a kindergarten level argument,'' Professor Carter told the Herald.

''Institutions or organisations simply pay for services rendered - in the same way that an architect is paid for their work, so are scientists,'' he said. ''What they may make any payment to me for, I'm not discussing with anybody outside of my family.''

Altogether, more than $US20 million had been spent funding and co-ordinating the activities of climate sceptics and bloggers since 2007, the documents suggest.

Other cash recipients include Anthony Watts, the leading US climate sceptic blogger, who is to receive $US90,000 for his work this year. Programs slated for funding include new curriculum modules that teach science from a climate-sceptic perspective, to be sent to US schools.

The documents discuss strategy to ''keep opposing voices out'' of the media and co-ordinate efforts with other ''groups capable of rapidly mobilising responses to new scientific findings, news stories, or unfavourable blog posts.''

The funding comes from 1800 donors, including many manufacturing and resources businesses, and also drug companies.

One anonymous donor has given a staggering $US8.6 million to the think tank since 2007.

The Heartland Institute did not respond to the Herald's questions about the content or veracity of the documents yesterday.

The documents were first published on a Canadian website, DeSmogBlog, which monitors the public relations efforts by some industry groups to discredit climate change science. ''An important message here is for the media to learn how to recognise this co-ordinated attack on science and to see through the PR pollution that Heartland and its network creates to cast doubt on climate change,'' said the website's executive director, Brendan DeMelle.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bob Carter gets $1,550 a month, or just $715 a fortnight, which is only 47% more than the single dole ($486) and this slimeball Cubby has coniptions.

So where was the info on funding for climate alarmists? Like the $1.6 million in ex gratia payments to James Hansen of NASA? And what about all the additional payments to Tim Flannery over and above his $180, 000 salary as Climate Cardinal?

A balanced climate article from Fairfax? You've got to be kidding.

Posted by Ian Mott, 16/02/2012 9:50:26 AM
Now the anti-alarmists are increasing in strength the apologists have to stop resting on their laurels do they not?

A good explanation by one Dr Heinz Theime 'Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics' is well worth a read and explains why CO2 can't contribute to a global temperature rise.

It also gives an explanation to the illogicality of the argument put by climatoligists using past temperature graphs associated with rising CO2 levels as evidence that CO2 must be 'the cause'.

Posted by daw, 16/02/2012 2:54:22 PM
Yet again another one sided version of someone getting paid to spout the other side of the global warming story!

How many of the pro- Global warming scientists are getting paid by various Government's to say what the Government wants to hear and what salary are they receiving?

Posted by tex of QLD, 16/02/2012 4:49:49 PM
Most of the alarmists are on the public tit. That alone raises serious questions about their maturity.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 17/02/2012 12:09:32 AM
Are there still people who believe in man made climate change? they are few and far between these days.

Simple analysis of the temperature will prove it is a load of crap!

Posted by mick, 17/02/2012 1:30:07 AM
Everyone should read Bob Carters excellent book " Climate The Counter Consenus" . It is one of the best books on the climate debate I have ever read. This book will open your mind to what is really going on concerning climate change. Bob Carter is a top scientist who writes the truth not political spin and the book is easy to read. 10 out of 10, best book I have read in years.
Posted by Loc Hey, 17/02/2012 8:12:12 AM
More wild assertions from Pott. Please provide evidence of the alleged millions paid to Prof Hansen.

As for the retainer paid to Prof Carter, it is presumably in addition to his professorial salary at JCU. What is important is that it is paid by the Heartland Institute, an organisation committed to the anti-science interests of the fossil fuel lobby. Among other items in the leaked Heartland documents is the 'classrooms' initiative, reportedly intended to dissuade teachers from teaching science.

Posted by nico, 17/02/2012 10:33:30 AM
Thank God for people like Bob Carter.

So what if hes paid a pittance , lets gets some balance here as Ian Mott says "What are the pro climate change "we're doomed" brigade paid?" A bit more than dole money I suspect.

Posted by Archibald, 17/02/2012 11:27:33 AM
Unlike some, daw provides a valid reference. Heinz Thieme's hypothesis has been answered in a number of places, including: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0802/0802.4324v1.pdf
Posted by nico, 17/02/2012 12:08:58 PM
Wow.look at who's chipping in here:

http://www.petercullentrust.com.au/about_sponsors

What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?

Posted by Bill Pounder, 17/02/2012 12:10:16 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
No influence... James Cook University Professor Bob Carter denies he is doing the bidding of a US climate sceptic think tank. Photo: Michael Chambers
No influence... James Cook University Professor Bob Carter denies he is doing the bidding of a US climate sceptic think tank. Photo: Michael Chambers
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you think chickens require more space than they are currently provided to be reasonably said to be "free to roam"?

Yes
(69.1%)

No
(30.9%)

Total Votes: 317
Poll Date: 14 February, 2012

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...