News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 US votes to reject Bush nightmare 

US votes to reject Bush nightmare

05 Nov, 2008 04:03 PM
Americans, frightened and frustrated, have rejected the party of George Bush and have made a leap of faith with Barack Obama.

Bill Clinton earlier accused Barack Obama of peddling a "fairy tale".

Today, the US has voted to reject the nightmare of George Bush's America and has elected for the fairy tale.

Americans are more pessimistic today that at the time of any election in four decades.

And they have good reason. "We are in a recession the likes of which we haven't seen since the early 1980s," said Anirvan Banerji of the Economic Cycle Research Institute in New York.

"We are already 10 months into this recession and we don't see any end in sight."

The economy was the dominant issue for 63pc of voters, according to exit polls.

The Bush Administration has given the US two recessions now, and two unfinished wars.

Of a panel of 100 US presidential historians, 61 have voted Bush as the worst president in 2ΒΌ centuries.

He is the most unpopular in the history of US opinion polling.

Americans have rejected the party of Bush and embraced a candidate who, in many ways, is his exact opposite.

He is not only youthful and black, articulate and cosmopolitan, he's also well to the left of Bush on many key issues.

"Bush and the economy were the fundamental dynamics of this election," observed the commentator E.J. Dionne of The Washington Post.

This leads the political scientist Larry Jacobs of the University of Minnesota to conclude that the election was a "negative referendum" on Bush rather than a positive mandate for Obama.

Yet Obama generated an enthusiasm without precedent in modern politics, with a bigger voter turnout expected than at any election since 1908.

The Republican candidate, John McCain, offered experience. Americans opted instead for one with fewer traditional qualifications than any president in decades, a man who has been in politics for only four years and has never held any executive office.

Obama's qualification was that he offered hope for a better America, or, as he put it, "change you can believe in".

With wealth disparities in America the widest at any time since the pre-Depression year of 1928, Obama rejected what he called the "trickle-down economics" of the Republicans.

He concentrated his promises on the middle class, offering them tax cuts, universal health care, and an improved education system.

But he also offered Americans an end to political bickering, promising a transcendent presidency that would rise above the bitter divisions of the so-called class wars - the divisions of religion, race, sexuality and political partisanship.

Yet embracing a man so youthful and inexperienced, and with a more left-wing stance than any president in at least 28 years, involved what The Wall Street Journal called "a leap of faith".

America has hoped, voted, and taken the leap.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
With the demise of Bush, I sure hope the arrogant American patronising attitude goes with him and now they will listen and will act fairly.

I have my doubts this will happen in the foreseeable future however - the opposite may well happen.

Posted by Rusty, 5/11/2008 6:41:14 PM
I think that George W Bush will go down in history as one of America's greatest. He was a decisive courageous leader who took the terrorists on and according to reputable commentators he has been hugely successful.

He also done very well in Iraq. I also believe that he has neutralised the North Korean problem.

He has also been a great ally of Australia. He also appeared to be a man of strong family values and conducted himself with dignity. He never appeared to succumb to pressure from the Media.

I believe that he did what he thought was right. Let us see how the new President operates when he has to get down to business. That he is the first Afro American President, good, but that will count for nothing when he is being judged on performance.

Posted by Realist, 5/11/2008 9:45:41 PM
As an American, I can tell you that I hope those attitudes go away as well. There are indeed a lot of arrogant, close-minded people that have helped Bush ruin many parts of the world as well as America. But if you saw those crowds in Chicago, LA, New York, etc, you would see people partying in the streets because they know things are changing. They have hope now.
Posted by Daryl, 6/11/2008 2:01:25 AM
Wealth disparities are not confined to the US. "Trickle down econonomics" has exhausted many workers without any real reward other than the satisfaction of a job well done.

Rural people can identify with this and though we all expect tough times ahead it would be nice to know wealth disparities may be addressed. Rich people can't get any richer when poor people are broke!

Posted by Common Cents, 6/11/2008 9:43:54 AM
Lame-duck president. Bush has a lot to answer for, but screwing up world agriculture is not one of them.

The Farm Bill is the creation of the Democrats, and by all indications Obama is going to proceed in the same direction: more farm welfare at home, more trade restrictions internationally.

Less pig-headed, perhaps, but the US is also less likely to lead on issues that are vital for Australia under Obama.

Posted by justamoment, 6/11/2008 10:47:16 AM
You may consider Bush a nightmare but Obama might just become a horror movie, just wait and see.
Posted by Kevin Rude, 6/11/2008 3:44:44 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Democrat Barack Obama appears to have triumphed over Republican John McCain.
Democrat Barack Obama appears to have triumphed over Republican John McCain.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Is now the right time for the Federal Government to be overhauling its drought assistance policy?

Yes - the sooner the better
(52%)

No - wait until the current drought is over
(32.8%)

It doesn't make any difference
(15.2%)

Total Votes: 454
Poll Date: 02 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural MON0152
 
IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
S&L Facebook
 
S&L Twitter
 
photo gallery


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...