News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Abbott in a muddle about emissions model 

Abbott in a muddle about emissions model

11 Dec, 2009 06:05 AM
TONY ABBOTT was digging himself out of his first hole as Opposition Leader last night after declaring boldly and often that the Government had failed to produce modelling which detailed the costs of its emissions trading scheme.

The Government, however, pointed to the public release in October last year of Treasury modelling and then set about branding Mr Abbott as erratic, reckless and unreliable.

Mr Abbott showed no humility. He dismissed the Treasury findings as ''implausible'' and out of date and demanded fresh figures.

Mr Abbott, who has adopted a no-holds-barred approach to Opposition, began the fight on Wednesday when he speculated that if Australia agreed to cut its emissions by more than 5 per cent, the cost would be upwards of $400 billion.

The ETS would raise $120 billion over 10 years if it cut emissions by the unconditional 5 per cent by 2020.

Following rumours the 2020 target could be lifted to 15 per cent or 25 per cent at Copenhagen, Mr Abbott made a simple linear multiplication to reach the $400 billion figure.

The Government said the real cost of an increased target would be about $150 billion and accused Mr Abbott of making a $250 billion blunder.

Campaigning in Townsville yesterday against the ''big whopping new tax'', Mr Abbott rejected he had got his figures wrong and accused the Government of having no modelling to underpin its claims. ''The Federal Government has never released the modelling,'' he said.

The Treasurer, Wayne Swan, said Mr Abbott was prone to making erratic claims. The assistant Climate Change Minister, Greg Combet, said Mr Abbott had ''demonstrated just how reckless he is and how unreliable he is''.

Mr Abbott claimed the Treasury figures had been ''superseded by events''. He alleged the Government had redone the work since ''and it's high time they released all this redone work''.

The Greens said Mr Abbott's misunderstanding of basic climate policy was ''astonishing'' but also blasted the Government, saying its defence exposed how cheap it would be to make more meaningful cuts to emissions.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
After reading this, and after listening to that buffoon, Barnaby Joyce, on the ABC's AM program this morning, I feel I have been transported back to the Joh era, where intelligence and thought were regarded as not only being unnecessary, but were clearly thought to be dangerous. Joyce even sounded like old Joh this morning, a gibbering jackass, and Tony Abbott doesn’t sound any better.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 11/12/2009 9:31:53 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott
Opposition Leader Tony Abbott
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
10 December, 2009
11 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...