News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Cabinet role raises doubts over MP's free vote 

Cabinet role raises doubts over MP's free vote

09 Sep, 2010 05:10 AM
INDEPENDENT MP Rob Oakeshott will determine whether he can keep free voting rights in Parliament before he accepts the new regional Australia ministry in a Gillard government cabinet.

Mr Oakeshott said if an arrangement could be reached in which he could sit in a Labor cabinet but be free to vote as he liked on the floor of Parliament, then a regional development role in a Gillard government would be ''certainly of interest''.

''It would have been easy to say yes on the spot, you know rip in on regional development for Australia,'' Mr Oakeshott said.

''But there's a whole bundle of issues that you have to work through in a situation like that, including it would be an unusual arrangement in a work sense even if it was to be accepted.''

Mr Oakeshott said he was keen to talk to former South Australian National Party MP Karlene Maywald, who was the River Murray minister in the state Labor government until earlier this year, to see how such a model could work.

Mr Oakeshott said he would also consider work-life balance issues in deciding whether to accept a spot in cabinet, and would talk to his wife over the coming days.

A spokesman for Prime Minister Julia Gillard would not comment yesterday on the details of the offer to Mr Oakeshott or how the independent would work with a Labor cabinet.

The new regional Australia portfolio will be established under the deal signed with Mr Oakeshott and fellow independent Tony Windsor in exchange for their support for a minority Labor government. Under the agreement, a new cabinet-level regional Australia portfolio will be established, including a new department and a new cabinet sub-committee chaired by the regional Australia minister and including the Prime Minister and Treasurer.

Labor insiders suggested the regional Australia ministry would be a beefed-up version of the Regional Development portfolio currently held by Anthony Albanese.

Included in the Labor-independent agreement is a $573 million injection into Regional Development Australia, currently overseen by Mr Albanese, and the establishment of a regional development think-tank based at rural universities and given an $8 million one-off government grant.

Mr Oakeshott said that Ms Gillard had not given him a deadline for the decision, but he understood she would probably want to announce her cabinet early next week at the latest and he was aiming to have a firm answer by the end of this week.

Mr Oakeshott said Opposition Leader Tony Abbott had made a similar offer for an unspecified role in a minority Coalition government.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yeah, right, the most loathed and illegitemate politician in regional Australia gets to be the Minister for those regions in the most loathed and illegitimate government. If this clown gets within egg range of me he is toast.
Posted by Ian Mott, 9/09/2010 9:51:27 AM
The way the Romans kept control of their empire was to make any troublemakers the local governor, that way instead of causing trouble and working against the Empire, they found themselves in a position (with the appropriate perks) of working for the Empire to keep other troublemakers in check.
Posted by Qlander, 9/09/2010 12:09:50 PM
Well Oakeshott you may as well join Labor permanently now.
Posted by PJ, 9/09/2010 12:28:47 PM
Oakshott and his thirty pieces of silver........
Posted by yoo Betcha, 9/09/2010 3:51:09 PM
You couldn't see clearly enough to hit anyone with an egg, Motty.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 9/09/2010 6:14:25 PM
A first time for everything. I usually disagree with Bushie Bill but LOL on the above comment. To all those passing perverse comments about these independents I say, hang on you people have never experienced a 'hung Federal Parliament' so why not give it time to work and if it doesn't - then there is time enough to be critical.
Posted by daw, 9/09/2010 7:45:29 PM
Well, fancy that? Bushie Bill furtively peeps above the parapet after his comprehensive drubbing over the gonzo IPCC emissions projections. And true to form, he leaps to the defense of a delusion, that Mug$hott wasn't given clear direction as to which side to support by his electorate. In fact, it was Bushy who was sneering at my reference to the Senate vote in this forum a full two days before the mainstream media picked up on the same theme, and agreed with me entirely. And here we are more than a week later and poor old Bushie is pretending that particular piece of roadkill makes a passable toupee. Only on your head, matey, only on your head.
Posted by Ian Mott, 10/09/2010 9:36:59 AM
Mug$hot and Whinger should make the most of their last hurrah, talking to punters in their electorates suggests they won’t be after the next election. Looks likes Julia has got them sorted.
Posted by Labor licker, 10/09/2010 1:33:11 PM
Well Mottley, some one must have liked him to vote for him! At least he has achieved something is his life - good on him!
Posted by tigerdicky, 10/09/2010 4:10:09 PM
(Part 1) Still we painfully suffer the uninformed and unintelligent outrage from the vitriolic wind master, our very own old brain-dead Motty (straight from the cast of “The Boys from Brazil ”), who is so inculcated with his own self-importance and who hasn't had a new thought since old Joh was receiving brown paper bags full of goodies in ancient times. Though it would be impossible, even with the help of a pneumatic drill, to introduce a new idea to Motty's blinkered mindset, the facts, dear mindless Motty, as stated before by me and many others, and unaddressed by you in these columns, are: 1. Independents are independent; get it Motty? Very simple really, but I guess even simple ideas are difficult if you are blessed with limited intellectual resources and are completely incapable of rational thought. 2. This leads to the inevitable conclusion, Motty, that independents, exactly like other elected members, are elected to represent the best interests of their electorates, by using their own individual intelligences and experiences, and by making up their own minds about issues. Did you understand this point, Motty?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 10/09/2010 4:21:04 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Independent MP Rob Oakeshott.
Independent MP Rob Oakeshott.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 September, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you believe a minority government formed with the support of the independents can provide a stable and effective administration?

Yes
(23.5%)

No
(70.6%)

Undecided
(6%)

Total Votes: 904
Poll Date: 05 September, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...