News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Coalition ag research boost 

Coalition ag research boost

05 Aug, 2010 01:00 AM
A MAJOR funding injection for agricultural research over the next four years underpins the Opposition's "real action plan" for Australia's farm sector, being unveiled today.

The Opposition's $270 million, four-year package of new funding commitments for the agriculture portfolio will also include new measures to more accurately map agriculture's carbon footprint, along with incentives to plant saltbush and Mallee crops in marginal outback country that will double as a fodder and carbon sink options.

The Coalition is funding these new measures through savings made across all portfolios in what it describes as "poorly performing Labor Government programs", while the agriculture portfolio has been spared any cuts.

Opposition spokesman for agriculture, John Cobb, said the policy paper represented no cuts to the agricultural portfolio in either its budget or programs, with all existing programs still on the table along along with these new commitments.

The Federal Government is still to release its policy commitments for agriculture should it win the election, although it did reveal this week that it would develop a national food plan in its next term of Government.

Eight special focus areas have been indentified in the Coalition's agricultural policy document.

Top of the list is a $150 million, three-year promise to increase the Commonwealth's contribution to rural research and development from a matching dollar for every dollar paid by industry levies to $1.25 for the 15 rural research and development corporations.

Grants of up to $100,000 will also be available for farmers to undertake water-saving work for stock and domestic and grazing practices, such as new troughs or pipes or improved grazing management to protect water resources.

There will also be funding for upgrading pumps to solar power.

A further $100,000 per farm will be available to farmers in marginal farming zones to plant saltbush or Mallee crops to rejuvenate eroded lands, provide new fodder opportunities during droughts, but also act as a carbon sink.

The Coalition will commit $8 million over four years to get an accurate picture of Australia's agricultural carbon footprint so Australian farming can "prove its reputation as a supplier of clean, green products" and not be discriminated against in world markets where food miles has become a major trade distortion.

"Food miles" are being used by major supermarkets, especially in Europe, to measure the travelling distance and emissions of food taken to the selling point, but can be deceiving because often the Australian produce may be cleaner and greener than the product grown closer to home.

Other smaller initiatives include the already flagged green-tape audit to identify costly environmental regulation which is either duplicated or getting in the way of food production; and research and study grants totalling $5m over four years to help attract and retain scientists and researchers for Australian agricultural research.

A feral animal and pest control program, worth $20m over four years, is also part of the new package to help make a dent in what the Coalition says is a $740 million a year cost to Australian agriculture.

A $15m "flying squad" will also be established to bulk up quarantine services when an urgent biosecurity risk is identified.

The promised programs are a modest increase each year in the agricultural portfolio which the Coalition says it will fund from the more than $24 billion in recurrent savings it believes it can make over the four-year forward estimates.

The policy paper says the savings are a result of "cutting Labor's waste and mismanagement and redirecting funding from inefficient and poorly performing Labor Government programs".

The Greens have criticised the policy for ignoring climate change, but said the increased spending on research and biosecurity was welcome.

“The Greens have taken a very strong stance on biosecurity and quarantine and we agree with the Coalition that this area, left to flounder under Labor, needs focus and funding," Greens deputy leader Christine Milne said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This is embarrassing. The Sheep CRC wasting $17 million per year is right up there with the insulation and school buildings debacles. Another $100 million of producers' money wasted on this absurd NLIS, and we are being softened up for carbon trading. I thought Tony Burke had no idea.
Posted by John Niven, 5/08/2010 7:43:27 AM
This will be great providing they don't waste one cent on GM research. We already know GM is unsafe, unnecessary and unsustainable.
Posted by ggwagga, 5/08/2010 7:49:17 AM
Where is their policy on grain marketing?
Posted by chook, 5/08/2010 8:34:00 AM
This is probably a waste of time as it is with the ALP and the Greens given that neither side of politics believes in the notion of private property ownership, or rights in that property, but here goes any way:- If the Coalition was to address the current self-destructive standing of Australia’s land ownership tenure system including security of equity and including personal property rights violations by Governments, then food security would take care of itself without the need for any sort of plan or Food Security Revolution. Mr Cobb, without security of tenure, as experimented with in the USSR, there is no food security as discovered by the USSR experiment. Even if it is just a mere minor policy area in any event, addressing so called ‘Green Tape’ is insufficient by a long-shot when compared to what has already been lost from the land tenure system. But then again, this would require principled politicians to act against the tide of environmental fundamentalism.
Posted by get off my land, 5/08/2010 10:56:47 AM
I call on every poltical party to tell Australians how they intend to protect the human, political and property rights of farmers who have been expected to bear the cost of carbon offsets as required by Kyoto and other Green inspired fantasies. Pressure put to bear on the Government by thousands of farmers and their supporters resulted in a Senate Enquiry on Native Vegetation Laws, Greenhouse Gas Abatement and Climate Change Measures. This Enquiry drew hundreds of submissions from affected farmers and environmentalists. From the conclusions of the enquiry: “It is unreasonable that the burden of broad environmental objectives is borne by a small number of Australians. Where the current native vegetation laws have resulted in reduction of property value for landholders, this is unjust and it is inappropriate that this burden is borne by individual landholders.” Please don't let this enquiry gather dust.
Posted by CO2notpoison, 5/08/2010 11:31:44 AM
The Netherlands merged the government’s research arm with the one and only University addressing Agriculture in that country. This has produced world class research that continues to contribute to the Netherlands’ agribusiness sector being equal to Australia’s one. The States’ have abandoned agricultural research in all but name; little of significance now occurs within State Departments. NSW’s department has had 5 rounds of redundancies in fewer years with a Treasury review currently being completed, and these reviews lead only to cuts. The route forward: 1 To reinvigorate agricultural research in Australia reduce the number of tertiary institutions covering agriculture so those that remain have critical mass which leads to good research, as per Wageningen (NL). 2 Merge all state departmental research capacity into those institutions. 3 Take food security seriously as through foreign acquisition of Australian assets production is destined for overseas whilst the world's population pressure will require answers. For Agriculture States are irrelevant – Agriculture is a national issue so work at that level.
Posted by Cronus, 5/08/2010 12:18:50 PM
Right oh Cobby - how about you and your party stop partying at OUR expense? Secure our property rights! Why are you dodging this issue? It's in your face - always has been. How many years have we on the land been putting up with this continual "buck passing" with you ELECTED to look after our rights! Step up, or ship out old mate! Secure our rights! You can throw all the $s you want to landowners, but without security of tenure, we, AUSTRALIA has lost everything! Damn you make me mad!
Posted by The Grazier, 5/08/2010 12:43:25 PM
Research is good; successive Governments in recent years have sadly neglected it. However research for future improvements will mean stuff all in the current situation when property rights have been subjected to abuse. Landowners can feel little security in the ownership of their land and the freedom to properly manage it. Another overriding concern is the restrictive terms of trade, the inability to generate even a modest profit, not helped by a lack of transparency in marketing systems that aren’t serving rural producers well. Rectify these two things & then rural producer will have enough faith in the future to get excited by this announcement to increase research.
Posted by Dale Stiller, 5/08/2010 7:02:33 PM
The Weddin Shire went from 38 piggeries to 2 with the importation of pig meats. 150,000 tonne per annum @ $2 per kilo is $300 million deprived of rural Australia for starters. $100 million per annum for this ridiculous NLIS. Research into carbon sink, a few old saltbush and mallee bushes will ensure we are all sunk. Anybody who survives this onslaught will be in spite of not because of "POLICIES ??" like this.
Posted by John Niven, 6/08/2010 8:21:18 AM
Cronus, the problem with that idea is the enormous array of different land and climate systems that Australian agriculture operates in.
Posted by Qlander, 6/08/2010 9:01:00 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Coalition agriculture spokesman John Cobb.
Coalition agriculture spokesman John Cobb.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
04 August, 2010
POLL
Q: Will the proposed merger of AWB and GrainCorp be good or bad for farmers' returns?

Good
(33.3%)

Bad
(40.3%)

No change
(8.2%)

Undecided
(18.2%)

Total Votes: 330
Poll Date: 01 August, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...