News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Libs back Greens call for inquiry into 'big Australia' 

Libs back Greens call for inquiry into 'big Australia'

16 Mar, 2010 06:48 AM
CONCERN about rapid population growth is likely to become a potential election issue after the opposition indicated it would support a Greens proposal for an inquiry into the prospect of a bigger Australia.

The Greens leader, Bob Brown, said yesterday that the inquiry would hold hearings in every capital city, asking whether Australia had the environmental, housing and transport capacity to meet a predicted increase in population to 36 million by mid-century.

''We don't have the infrastructure to deal with 21 million people at the moment - for example, public transport and water infrastructure - let alone the estimated 35 million people by mid-century,'' Senator Brown said.

The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, said he was unapologetic about supporting a ''Big Australia'', following the release of population projections in Treasury's latest Intergenerational Report.

The opposition immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison, said the opposition would work with the Greens on the proposed inquiry.

''Australians want to be heard on this issue,'' he said. ''I think Australians are very frustrated by a prime minister who just signs us up to a 36 million population and they don't have any say about it.''

The capacity of state and local governments to provide services for their growing constituencies needed to be examined, he said.

''All of these issues require some very careful analysis to know what our migration intake should be.''

The Greens will move a motion in the Senate in May calling for the inquiry to be set up.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I am amazed! considering Little Johnny Coward flooded this country with future Liberal party voters!
Posted by tigerdicky, 16/03/2010 8:38:36 AM
Why cant they do an inquirie into boosting the BIRTH RATE of our current population instead???
Posted by BlinkyBill, 16/03/2010 10:36:08 AM
Blinky it is too expensive to have kids. And i don't want them anyway
Posted by Terence, 16/03/2010 11:20:50 AM
I hope that they look into de-centralisation. This would relieve the pressure on the availability of land and the infrastructure of the half dozen cities that about 90% of Australians live in at the moment. This could also improve resources to many rural communities. Unfortunately I very much doubt it as most of these committies are only set up to score political points not to solve problems.
Posted by Farmer Dave, 17/03/2010 7:27:47 AM
Spot on Dave. We have a problem with urban population growth and urban infrastructure. And it is all their own fault. Both Liberals and Labor are extreme centralists who regard rural decline as some sort of perverted economic darwinism. But the facts are that there is more than enough room outside the major cities. The cities are now experiencing serious diseconomies of scale in the form of congestion costs and exponential inflation in infrastructure costs. In regional Australia increased population will continue to deliver economies of scale for decades to come. Our immigration policy has favoured urban migrants for the past half century and our urban governments have applied double standards when seeking what they euphemistically call efficiency gains.
Posted by Ian Mott, 17/03/2010 8:01:23 AM
Great idea! The planet is groaning under the weight of a plague of humans and all our other problems (Global warming, water & oil shortages, etc.) either stem from this or pale into insignificance next to this. All our solutions (Carbon taxes, ETSs, etc.) should start by addressing this, the main problem, rather than politically-correct window-dressing as is the current situation. As with all plagues Mother Nature will respond with a massive die-off one day unless we see the error of our ways and take immediate action to control our numbers. How long before our politicians (especially Kevin Rudd) and public servants can see this glaringly obvious impending disaster? The current Labour Government (& maybe the Liberal opposition?) are relying on this population growth to fund their massive growth in expenditure. I believe it is time they showed a some restraint, moderation and responsible planning for the future of our country (& planet).
Posted by Blue, 17/03/2010 8:06:47 AM
The only people who want more people are the businesses who thrive on more consumers. There is nothing wrong with Melbourne (and other capitals) that getting rid of 2 million people wouldn't fix. This country is OVERPOPULATED NOW. It just leads to restrictive laws and management by idiots, just like we have now, already. How much worse do we want it. Australia was a wonderful place when we only had 8 million people. Everything was free, and uncluttered with everyone elses dross.
Posted by denis, 17/03/2010 9:14:03 AM
Well said Blue, refreshing to hear some down to earth basic unarguable common sense for a change re the new climate change relligion, which refuses to acknowledge population increase & urban sprawl as THE most unsustainable things on the planet!
Posted by yofussn, 17/03/2010 9:15:49 AM
Blinky, you make a very good point. Unfortunately we have turned into such a materialistic, money focused society that many people think they can't afford to have children! very sad.
Posted by kirra, 17/03/2010 7:35:28 PM
Spot on Ian Mott as usual. The only part of Aust that is overpopulated is the metropolitan areas. Rural and regional Aust is dieing from lack of population.
Posted by R, 17/03/2010 9:12:54 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Senator Bob Brown.
Senator Bob Brown.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 March, 2010
15 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you support the move to introduce an import risk analysis on beef from BSE-affected countries?

Yes
(74.6%)

No
(22.4%)

Uncommitted
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 389
Poll Date: 15 March, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...