News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Pressure on Water Act 

Pressure on Water Act

08 Dec, 2010 08:15 AM
THE federal government is under pressure to rewrite the Water Act after the head of the Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Mike Taylor, resigned with a blunt warning that the legislation requires the environment be given priority over rural ­communities.

But Prime Minister Julia Gillard yesterday stuck to the government's interpretation of the controversial act, arguing that it could allow environmental goals to be balanced with social and economic outcomes, The Australian Financial Review reports.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott said the resignation showed the government's approach to the Murray-Darling reforms was an "absolute disaster". And Coalition water spokesman Barnaby Joyce said Mr Taylor's comments confirmed there was confusion about the legislation and it must be re-examined.

"The desire of the Parliament has been for a triple bottom-line approach. If it's become apparent that's not delivered in the Water Act, then it should be amended so it is delivered," he said.

National Irrigators Council chief executive Danny O'Brien said yesterday Mr Taylor's statement confirmed fears that the Water Act did not allow for proper consideration of the costs to communities.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Good riddance. Now for the rest of the venal conspiratorial scum who think they can play fast and loose with the rights and liberties of the persecuted farming minority. The only reason this whole issue is being treated as a trade-off between human needs and environmental needs is because the Murray Mouth Mafia has systematically misinformed the debate. They have not made any effort to find alternate options and have conspicuously failed to make the infrastructure investments that would have captured major water savings.

Purge the lot of them.

Posted by Ian Mott, 8/12/2010 10:04:09 AM
The Water Act 2007 under the mainstay’s of the United Nations ‘Ramsar Convention’ and the ‘Convention of on Biological Diversity’ made it only a matter of time before the Commonwealth got caught with it’s pants down governing Australia this way.

Now it is only a matter of either building the necessary infrastructure, or pay-up for the benefit received from the loss of private equity incurred by those burdened by this obnoxious system of governance.

Posted by hide the decline, 9/12/2010 10:12:28 AM
Motty, I think you'll find that if the eastern state's irrigators made the kind of 'infrastructure investments' that SA irrigators have (water re-use, pipelines, pressure regs., dripper systems etc.) they could grow just as much food with 35% less water. Many SA farmers now have zero access to irrigation!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Cow Cocky, 10/12/2010 1:34:44 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Mike Taylor.
Mike Taylor.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
06 December, 2010
27 November, 2010
08 December, 2010
07 December, 2010
POLL
Q: Should Australian farmers remain responsible for sheep exported to the Middle East?

Yes
(51.3%)

No
(44.8%)

Undecided
(4%)

Total Votes: 753
Poll Date: 06 December, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...