News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Renewable energy key to emissions reduction 

Renewable energy key to emissions reduction

30 Aug, 2010 10:18 AM
The renewable energy sector warns Australia will fall short of its emissions reduction targets unless the government heeds the calls of key cross-benchers for more investment in solar, wind and geothermal power.

All three country independents – Tony Windsor, Rob Oakeshott and Bob Katter – have stressed the need for a bigger focus on renewable power, as has newly elected Greens MP Adam Bandt. Mr Bandt and Mr Oakeshott believe this should be pursued in conjunction with the introduction of a carbon price.

"The countries and the economies that are going to do well in the 21st century are the countries that lead the world in renewable energy technologies," Mr Bandt said last Wednesday. But Mr Katter, and to some extent Mr Windsor, see renewable energy as an alternative to emissions trading and a chance to cut emissions while providing benefits to regional areas.

Clean Energy Council chief executive Matthew Warren said it was unsurprising that MPs from regional areas supported renewable energy, as developments such as wind farms could provide farmers with drought-proof income, the The Australian Financial Review reports.

"It makes sense for people interested in the development of regional Australia to support renewables because that's where most of the investment and jobs are going to go," he said.

The government's mandatory renewable energy target (MRET) commits Australia to ensuring that 20 per cent of its power comes from renewables by 2020. Even so, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong said last year that, in the absence of an emissions trading scheme, Australia's emissions were still projected to be 20 per cent higher in 2020 than they were in 2000.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Renewable energy YES but forget wind and solar - they are too capital intensive and unreliable. Geothermal in the form of Hot Fractured Rock (HFR) also known as Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) is the way to go. It is available 24/7 as base load generation and Australia has the highest quality sites any where in the world AND there are massive reserves capable of supplying all of Australia's needs for centuries to come - even when the demand doubles trebles or quadruples. It is safe and pollution free. The only slight downside is that the best quality sites are distant from load centres but this is only a difficulty not an insurmountable problem. By building new stations with this HFR leaves coal free to be exported to boost export income. Why oh why can't those in power see all these advantages?
Posted by daw, 30/08/2010 9:03:43 PM
Oh come on, not more renewable energy drivel. We won't be able to afford to turn on a light if we keep building wind farms. What a joke. Why do none of the clowns in power know that they do not work?
Posted by nathan, 31/08/2010 8:47:42 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
27 August, 2010
POLL
Q: Are the current record lamb prices sustainable for the industry in the long term?

Yes
(37.2%)

No
(49.9%)

Unsure
(13%)

Total Votes: 401
Poll Date: 29 August, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...