News 
 National Rural News 
 Dairy 
 General 
 Vic dairy farm numbers expected to plummet 

Vic dairy farm numbers expected to plummet

25 Jun, 2008 10:27 AM
THE number of Victorian dairy farms is projected to drop by almost 20pc to 4331 during the next four years despite farm-gate milk prices paid to farmers being at record highs.

Some farmers are retiring, some are tired of battling drought and others are selling to beef farmers or to capitalise on higher land values, industry insiders say.

According to figures presented at the United Dairyfarmers of Victoria annual conference at Melbourne University yesterday, farm numbers will plummet from 5318 in 2007-08 to 4331 in 2011-12, a drop of 18.6pc. This comes after numbers fell by 1483, or 21pc, between 2002-03 and 2007-08.

Despite the expected decline in farms, milk production in the State is forecast to climb gradually to 6 billion litres by 2011-12. Industry insiders say output will rise as some farmers sell to others and farms become bigger and more productive.

Chris Phillips, general manager, trade and strategy, at Dairy Australia, said surveys revealed that most farmers expected to expand operations over the next three years, while 5-10pc expected to leave the industry.

"There is no doubt the historical trend is for fewer farms operating … But what we have seen is that those farms that are staying in business are growing in size," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Take a lesson from the pig industry and don't count your chickens before they hatch
Posted by Richie10, 25/06/2008 5:14:51 PM
Just the industry living in fairyland again. Surveys have been talking about farmers increasing investment for the last 5 years and, given the loss of farmers from the industry the net investment would be down. Capital per farm may be up, but capital in the industry is almost certainly down.
Posted by Ken, 26/06/2008 9:55:42 AM
Statistics are like a bikini: what they reveal is interesting but what they conceal is vital. Government and industry bodies continue to pedal this non-sense of farm aggregation being vital to an industry's future. It is not. Profitability is. And the relationship between farm size and an individuals return on capital is not strong. Why? One reason is because in reality most farmers increasing their size are doing so with bank debt and no mention is made that expanding growers are merely consolidating industry debts.

The effect of this: look at the number of large farms for sale in the Burdekin and other sugar regions. Many of these blokes in good faith tried this path but when it is financed by debt, low returns on capital are inevitably beaten down by interest repayments among other factors. In poker there is a saying that if you do not know who the patsy is, you're the patsy. The farmer is encouraged to aggregate (the need to finance this is glossed over) but what are the people recommending this action doing? How many bureacrats and other helpers have given up the security of their wage, cashed in their super and walked the walk?

Posted by Farmer Joe, 26/06/2008 10:47:54 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...