News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Another rise in GM plantings 

Another rise in GM plantings

06 May, 2010 11:20 AM
PLANTINGS of genetically modified canola in Australia will rise for the third consecutive year, mainly on the back of the lifting of the moratorium on production in Western Australia, according to researchers at the Kondinin Group.

With the introduction of GM into Western Australia, Kondinin estimates more than 90,000ha will be grown across Australia this year.

It marks a big increase from the 9600ha sown in the first year of GM production in 2008.

This increased four-fold during 2009 to 41,000ha, out of a total of 461,000ha sown to canola.

And Kondinin also found acceptance to the crops was rising within the farming community, with 51pc of growers surveyed saying they supported the introduction of GM crops, almost a 20 per cent increase from 2002.

It appears a significant proportion of WA growers will look at planting GM in its first year there, with Kondinin reporting that more than 600 individuals have completed the necessary GM accreditation process and more than 300 growers have signed a licence and stewardship agreement in preparation for the technology.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Anyone planting GM canola cannot have been following what is going on in the US: ie massive weeds immune to Roundup, Department of Justice looking at Monsanto's dominance in seed ownership (they own the RR canola planted in Australia) also studies showing that the continued use of Roundup (glyphosate) is causing a build up of plant diseases and toxins. Australian farmers planting GM is a victory of spin over reality. The sad thing is that they will find out in the medium term that they have not only ruined their own farms but that of their neighbours too. Very sad.
Posted by fran, 6/05/2010 10:44:14 PM
This further demonstrates the gullibility of some farmers to fall for this insidious and unsustainable technology. Do they really think GMOs will not create the horrendous problems already experience in America. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/business/energy-environment/04weed.html?scp=2&sq=roundup&st=cse
Posted by ggwagga, 7/05/2010 8:13:51 AM
Sorry fran and ggwagga. The feet tell the story. I find your condescending view of growers that they are gullible, stupid and do not know what they are doing abhorrent. For growers that wish not to grow GM I support you, and will personally do all I can to ensure you have this choice. For those growers wishing to grow GM then I likewise support you also. Lets let the growers look at the value proposition and make the choice, not have the crusaders paint horror stories based on fiction.
Posted by Crusader defender, 7/05/2010 10:01:29 AM
fran and ggwagga betray their likely political stripes and physical location by their attitude and comments. GM crops provide environmental and financial benefits to growers, otherwise they frankly wouldn't be used in growing numbers. Aren't half a billion hectares of crops grown over 10 years enough for you? There must be lots of pretty stupid & broke farmers out there. Farmers are also rational and responsible stewards of their land and the environment generally; noone is dumb enough to kill the golden goose. If there were demonstrated, verifiable environmental damage caused by GM crops then farmers wouldn't grow them (but there isn't). Would you pour poison in your backyard in Paddington or Fitzroy for a few bucks? Neither would farmers.
Posted by DMS, 7/05/2010 10:33:11 AM
Uh... Financial benefits? Is that any excuse to put the rest of us at risk?! Heroin drug lords reap a lot of financial benefits mate, but that doesn't make it right! As for environmental benefits, you've got to be having a laugh? Right?
Posted by damnation, 7/05/2010 11:19:36 AM
DMS, you are absolutely right on the ball here - lots of farmers out there who are technically broke (if you consider their debts to income ratio) and who are way under educated to understand the full implications of the GM canola business. Sure Monsanto marketing gang is paid well enough to lure desperate country bloke with their golden mountains promises - pity all they see is the immediate "financial benefits". I'd love to come back to this argument in 20 years time and see who was right here. The only worry is that quite a few of those country blokes won't be around in this world - courtesy to the level of chemical exposure they are getting now.
Posted by Andrew, 7/05/2010 11:44:47 AM
Are you really suggesting that GM farmers are akin to heroin lords? I'm speechless. This is the downside of the internet I am afraid, where these kind of comments can reach millions. I'm betting damnation is a smoker to boot.
Posted by Appalled, 7/05/2010 12:47:01 PM
I guess that was a bit harsh... But my point is not everything that makes a profit is good... And the negative impacts of GM may end up affecting more people than heroin... I'm appalled too though, 'Appalled', as I don't want GM in my world, yet there it is... Oh yeah, non-smoker.
Posted by damnation, 7/05/2010 5:10:30 PM
DMS, you make a habit of being wrong. I neither live in Paddington nor Fitzroy, and GMOs only provide benefit to the patent holder, seed and chemical distributor; everyone else is the loser, including the environment. Just follow the money trail and do any significant dollars stay local? I am a farmer and have owned and operated farms in two States since 1958. I'm certainly not gullible like those who are seduced by the deceitful GMO spin. GM takes away farmers' and consumers' choice, a little like Henry Ford with his statement, “You can have any colour you like so long as it is black.” Andrew, let's hope all farmers will wake up to the GMO deceit sooner rather that later.
Posted by ggwagga, 7/05/2010 7:33:21 PM
Andrew you dont have a clue! You imply that farmers who are growing GM canola are poorly educated and broke to embrace GM. I am in my 30s, university educated and have a background in agronomy. I would say that the majority of farmers that are growing GM crops or thinking about it as a possible replacement for Triazine tolerant or Clearfield varieties are running muliti million dollar farms embracing latest technonolgy are in the top 20% of grain farms. Please tell me how GM cotton has not been successful in Australia!
Posted by young farmer, 7/05/2010 10:00:46 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: What impact will the proposed changes to tax system have on your farm business?

Help
(6.2%)

Hurt
(67.3%)

No change
(26.5%)

Total Votes: 324
Poll Date: 02 May, 2010

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...