News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Can GM rice fill the world's shortfall? 

Can GM rice fill the world's shortfall?

17 Nov, 2009 03:30 PM
Genetically modified (GM) crops are not the only answer to Asia’s looming food deficit, but multinational crop technology company Syngenta argues that they must be part of the mix.

Syngenta made the case for GM technology to journalists in Bangkok two weeks ago, as part of a broader effort to open Asian government doors that have so far remained closed to genetically modified food crops.

Among the Asian nations, only India and China and The Philippines have embraced the technology, with India planting around 7.6 million hectares of cotton in 2009.

The Philippines is the only Asian country to date to introduce a GM grain crop, planting about 400,000ha of maize in 2008.

Syngenta believes it is time for the barriers against GM to come down, so that biotechnology companies can confidently invest in GM research ahead of the looming food crisis.

“Given the projected increase in population and with less land and water available, we will need all available agricultural technologies, including biotechnology, to meet the current and projected global demand for food, feed, fiber, and biofuels,” said Peter Pickering, Syngenta’s head of seeds for the Asia Pacific.

“GM is not the only solution, but it is an extremely powerful one.”

In Asia, the urgency to grow more food from less land and water makes it likely that GM rice will be eventually grown on a broad scale.

The influential International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) has thrown its weight behind the GM rice push, running its own GM research programs and collaborations with private companies.

IRRI expects that the first GM rice, the famous “Golden Rice” engineered to synthesise Vitamin A, could be grown in Bangladesh and the Philippines by 2012.

Vitamin A deficiency is reported to affect about 124 million people in Africa and Asia. It is estimated to cause about one million deaths a year and 500,000 cases of blindness.

Golden Rice carries genes from the daffodil and a soil bacteria which allow it to synthesise beta-carotene, an inactive organic form of Vitamin A. Rice can synthesise beta-carotene in its leaves, but the modification carries that ability through to the rice grain.

Syngenta donated several of its patented technologies to the Golden Rice project for humanitarian purposes, with other biotech companies also making contributions—gestures that have done little to mollify Greenpeace’s concerns that Golden Rice is a Trojan Horse being used to soften resistance to GM.

Outside Golden Rice, production traits like water and nitrogen use efficiency, and tolerance to salinity and flooding, are early targets of GM rice research.

Syngenta is not working on specific rice products, Mr Pickering said, but rather on understanding general traits that protect plants from stress.

“Our early stage research into drought resistance may result in traits that could be utilised in rice,” he said.

“Syngenta also has input trait technology such as herbicide and insect resistance which could also be incorporated.”

Improving yield, an all-important outcome if the goal of “more from less” is to be met, is in Mr Pickering’s analysis not simply about increasing grain number or volume but helping the seed to “deliver its genetic potential”.

“We believe that global rice yields could be increased from the current average of around four tonnes per hectare to around six tonnes/ha, using existing technology,” Mr Pickering said.

At Syngenta’s Philippines research facility, yields have sometimes reached four times the global average using existing technology and management.

“This emphasises the point that the key to improving productivity lies in the adoption of existing and new technology, and that biotechnology forms just one part of the complete farmer toolbox.”

IRRI Media Relations manager Sophie Clayton told the Bangkok media workshop that transforming rice from a relatively inefficient C3 plant to a more water efficient, nitrogen efficient C4 plants is also on the IRRI research agenda.

Meanwhile, there are other low-hanging fruit in the quest to deliver an extra 8-10 million tonnes of rice to Asia each year, Ms Clayton said.

Post-harvest losses from inefficient threshing, storage and milling currently accounts for up to 25 per cent physical losses between farm and rice consumer—offering a substantial boost to Asia’s food supply if those losses can be recaptured.

* Matthew Cawood was a guest of Syngenta in Bangkok.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I'm disappointed we don't have any comments on here about how the 1 million deaths and 500,000 cases of blindness are really a result of transnational corporations taking over the world and inflicting unheard of evils. And now they want to make money of it??? Despicable! But I guess even the most insane activist can't argue against golden rice... can they?
Posted by David, 17/11/2009 4:16:37 PM, on Stock & Land
Here we go again. I thought that golden rice was dead and buried. But no they have to tug on the heart string of good and honest people by trundling out this hollow propaganda. The answer to the headline is an emphatic NO. According to dietary reference guides, only one molecule of ß-carotene is absorbed for every 12 consumed. This means that a person would need to consume 5.25 kg of uncooked Golden Rice every day to meet daily vitamin A requirements. This 5.25 kg would most probably need to be increased to make allowance for the vitamin A lost because of cooking. The vitamin A gene in Golden Rice comes from daffodil. However, rice already makes vitamin A in its husk. The much safer option is to use Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) which renders genetic engineering obsolete and completely unnecessary. The failure of GM crops in India has resulted in thousands of farmers committing suicide – often via drinking roundup! Why offer these desperate people such false hope?
Posted by ggwagga, 17/11/2009 8:20:51 PM, on Stock & Land
Why is everyone who comments on these things so cynical? Is it not possible that there are some people in the world genuinely trying to help others by developing this technology? Your lives are better because of technology that brings clean water, transport, medicine, even the internet, so why complain when organisations try to make better food? You have a right to question, but also a responsibility to listen to both sides of the story. Giving desperate people false hope? Would you say this to a doctor trying to cure cancer?
Posted by Stace, 18/11/2009 8:26:23 AM, on The Land
I will never ever eat it. Stace, how naive can you get?
Posted by Richard, 18/11/2009 11:27:39 AM, on Queensland Country Life
If I was starving, I would eat any food I could get. How naive can you get?
Posted by Stace, 18/11/2009 12:27:41 PM, on The Land
There was an article on the Financial Times website the other day: "Nestlé chief hits at ‘well-fed activists’". Nestle chairman, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, makes some good points. It would be good for people to look them up.
Posted by Stace, 18/11/2009 12:43:30 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
16 November, 2009
17 November, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe your farm business can profit from an emissions trading scheme?

Yes
(20.3%)

No
(70.1%)

Undecided
(9.6%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 15 November, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Langi Kal Kal
 
Win a bull
 
Rural Business Awards
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
2010 Beef & Cattle Directory
 
Horse Deals Australia


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...