News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Demand for GM canola strong overseas, says PGA 

Demand for GM canola strong overseas, says PGA

26/06/2008 3:01:00 PM
New evidence from Canada starkly demonstrates the lack of vision regarding GM food by the current WA Government, according to PGA Western Graingrowers.

But on the east coast the GeneEthics Network is warning that contract harvesters and apiarists are among the many rural businesses which will be affected by Monsanto's commercial GM canola grown at sites in NSW and Victoria this winter.

In WA PGA Western Graingrowers chairman, Leon Bradley, has disputed State Government claims that there is no demand for food from GM crops, arguing that the State's GM moratorium was costing farmers.

"Premier Alan Carpenter and Agriculture Minister Kim Chance claim that there is no demand for food produced from GM crops, that there are no advantages from producing GM canola, and that indeed WA gain certain premiums from producing non-GM canola," Mr Bradley said.

"If this were true, you would expect that Canadian canola production would be in decline, and Canadian farmers going out backwards due to falling sales and declining prices.

"Figures released by Stats Canada indicate that Canadian farmers have just planted a record canola crop of almost 16 million acres, exceeding last year's record of 14.7 million acres.

"Indeed this year's crop represents 2.7 million acres above the average Canadian crop, and is more than enough to displace the entire canola production of Australia on the international market.

"Fortunately for Australia, the State Governments of NSW and Victoria have recognised reality and allowed GM canola to be grown commercially.

"By deliberately blocking the process of technological advance in agriculture, the Carpenter Government has claimed a unique place in WA history."

But the GeneEthics Network says GM contamination could wreck numerous rural businesses.

"The Victorian and NSW governments that permit GM canola to be grown must set up a public register of all GM sites so we can do our best to avoid GM contamination," said beekeeper Graham Connell of Macedon, Victoria.

"At the Victorian Apiarists meeting on Friday, I will call for strong laws to protect the beekeeping industry like motions recently passed by NSW Apiarists."

The NSW Apiarists Conference called for GM crop sites to be published and for government to be put on notice that beekeepers will seek compensation if honey sales, markets and product confidence suffer from GM canola.

"Grain harvesters also want GM canola registered as a 'notifiable crop' so that we are officially told where all GM canola is grown," says Rod Gribble of the Australian Grain Harvesters Association NSW.

"AGHA members are advised to gain declarations as to the status of all canola crops & to also gain liability exemption from any action that may result in the spread of GM crop material into any other supply chain or property, before they start harvesting.

"Contract harvesters will not accept any liability or responsibility for any spread or cross contamination of GM crop material that may result in the event of harvesting any crops."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
WA Premier, Alan Carpenter, is to be applauded for his responsible stand on preventing these noxious GM crops from being planted in WA. Canadian farmers receive subsidies, hence the reason they are able to continue farming. As for Canadians planting more acres of GM, they are just chasing their tail attempting to make a living - without subsidies they're finished. Proponents of GM need to take the blinkers off and do some real research before it's too late. Among many detrimental things, GM crops will lead to the demise of the traditional family farm, imagine what that will do to rural communities. There are myriad reason why GM crops should be outlawed.
Posted by ggwagga on 27/06/2008 8:27:05 AM
ggwagga is wrong on several counts. GM canola is not "noxious" and whether subsidised or not, Canadian farmers have a huge world market, which they dominate, for canola products derived from GM crops. Outlawing farmers new technology choices as gg proposes will be a more likely to lead to the demise of farmers.
Posted by jgcan on 27/06/2008 10:40:14 AM
I am amazed that these comments were even published from the West. The article answers Mr Bradley's ludicrous quote. The following paragraph proves we must always remain GM free: "Indeed this year's crop represents 2.7 million acres above the average Canadian crop, and is more than enough to displace the entire canola production of Australia on the international market". This is proof we need to remain GM free as much as possible otherwise we join the masses. I am amazed that people like Mr Bradley honestly think that there is a demand for GM canola. The people who want it are buying to a price and in most part they have no choice. The world if given a choice and price was the same, would buy non GM 100pc of the time, and don't kid yourself otherwise.
Posted by themule on 27/06/2008 10:49:04 AM
I am amazed at the mules comments. Everybody buys on value and price is part of that, if you value non-GM and GM is cheaper then you pay higher and get what you pay for. If price is the main value then you buy cheaper and in this case that is GM. The subsidy issue is a straw man because all Canadian canola growers GM or non-GM get the same subsidy so the price difference between GM and non-GM is the result of growing the lower farm input GM. So the vast and growing market for GM canola is the result of the low value of non-GM and don't kid yourself otherwise.
Posted by Andrew23 on 27/06/2008 11:18:33 AM
Leon Bradley is a very persistent man. He has been instrumental in bringing about reform to the wheat industry. If he is as persistent in his pursuit of GM technology WA farmers will soon have access to this amazing tool which will transform canola production in this State. Go Leon!
Posted by WA Wheat Farmers on 27/06/2008 11:52:43 AM
First of all Canadian grain Farmers do not get any subsidies, that's the Americans. Secondly yes, you could call GM canola "noxious". Thirdly, the reason that so much canola is being planted here is that the price is so high and farming is in the bucket in this county so farmers are going where the dollars are despite the long term deprivation of the soil caused by canola. Keep up the battle Australia against GM foods
Posted by Canada on 27/06/2008 2:21:46 PM
People who can choose, choose non-GM. GM is not yet reliably tested for long-term effects on consumers, despite what the review boards in Aussie might say [since they are stacked with industry employees, who obviously have a conflict of interest]. In Europe, they don't accept GM food. Same in Japan. Tasmania is winning big contracts because it is still separate from GM. Why not WA? Also, GM farming is farmers working like peasants for their GM corporation fuedal masters, who control what seeds the can use, and what chemicals they have to use to get the seed to grow. If you don't believe me, ask the Canadian farmers who told me that, and are trying to avoid being sued by GM TNCs for unwanted GM found on their property. Lastly, GM is totally reliant on petroleum products - for equipment fuel, fertilizer, and biocides - therefore GM is unsustainable against Peak Oil. Local, well-designed and managed permaculture gardens do very well with no petrol products on small and [as community gardens] medium levels. If you ensure your access to local, non-GM ['Heritage'] seed, you don't have to leave your food security to Monsanto and other TNCs who see food as just another commodity to manipulate for profit.
Posted by Olivier on 29/06/2008 11:24:55 AM
The EU is the world's second biggest buyer of GM produce. They import 30 million tonnes of GM soy product and seven EU countries produce GM crops. Japan imports over 20mt of GM produce and China imports over 30mt of GM produce. The world is demanding the supply of more GM product because the market says so.
Posted by Kel on 1/07/2008 11:03:10 AM
May I suggest (Jgcan), just because technology is new doesn’t make it OK or safe. Would you feed your children these obnoxious crops? If so, I suggest you pay particular attention to the link between GM and Morgellons disease. See at the end of this post. In my view, GM canola is a noxious weed, just watch how it spreads, contaminates and how difficult it will be to control.

Biotechnology firms have been hyping genetically engineered crops for some time. During that time, the commercially available GM crops have failed to exhibit the critical traits necessary to produce enough food to feed the world's population. Those traits include increases in maximum yields and improved drought and stress tolerance. In reality, most of these GM crops available today are engineered to withstand the application of glyphosate. A much smaller portion of these crops are engineered to fight off certain pests. Neither of these traits is vital to increasing food production. Weeds, pests and crop disease are all indicators of poor management of soil fertility and biology.

There are no GM crops on the market today to directly maximize yields. There are no GM crops on the market engineered to resist drought. And there are no crops on the market engineered to reduce fertilizer use. Not one.

There are proven ways to increase yields and protect crops. Traditional plant breeding, crop rotation and marker-assisted breeding - which incorporates molecular biology to enhance traditional breeding -- and ecological farming systems that use such methods as crop rotation and cover crops, have a long history of boosting food crop yields. In places like Africa, appropriate fertilizer, better grain storage, and improved roads would be much better and more cost-effective options than expensive, patented, biotechnology seeds that so far offer so little, and the risks are so high. GM crops are dependent on an unsustainable production system; you would have to have rocks for brains to ignore all the warning signs.

There is no doubt that there is a link between Agrobacterium used in developing GM crops and Morgellons Disease. For those unconvinced visit: http://www.ahf-au.org/300608/gm.morgellons.htm http://www.i-sis.org.uk/agrobacteriumAndMorgellons.php

Posted by ggwagga on 2/07/2008 8:38:26 AM
If the GM product is so good, then why is there such reluctance to have it listed on the label as an ingredient? Or is it because if something goes wrong down the track those affected won't be able to identify those using it should they want to sue?

One could always try to take on Monsanto in the courts, but past experience suggests that success would be unlikely and if it was we only need to look at the recent changes to payouts regarding the Exxon Valdez disaster. Even if you win, you will get nothing.

Let those who chose to use such products wear the responsibility. If they go out of business, then they can take on the designer (Monsanto).

Of course, if such ingredients are on the label, I won't have to worry because I won't knowingly use these products. i will tell my kids that they should wait at least 30 years to see what happens. That would be a reasonable period of time to see if is OK. (Belgrave, Vic.)

Posted by pilotyoda on 3/07/2008 7:59:35 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: What should the Federal Government do to relieve the cost of petrol?

Continue with its current approach
(4.2%)

Cut petrol excise by 5c/l
(1.6%)

Cut petrol excise by 10c/l
(29.9%)

Invest petrol revenue in alternative fuel research
(39%)

Mandate 10pc biofuel content in petrol
(13.3%)

Other
(11.9%)

Total Votes: 428
Poll Date: 23/06/2008

6/10/2008 | In journalism there is nothing worse than interviewing someone with TB - True Believerism. But the rapidly changing world is turning traditional ideology upside down, leaving TB sufferers supporting a brand and not a belief.
S&L Advertising
 
S&L Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
You need cash
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...