News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 EU takes a step towards re-embracing GM 

EU takes a step towards re-embracing GM

14 Dec, 2009 10:53 AM
THE recent approval of a number of biotech corn varieties in the European Union (EU) is a step in the right direction for a resumption of trade in US feed ingredients such as distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and corn gluten feed for the current marketing year, according to the US Grains Council (USGC).

These events include Monsanto's YieldGard VT Pro (MON 89034) and YieldGard VT Rootworm/RR2 (MON 88017), both developed by Monsanto Company; and Agrisure RW (MIR 604), developed by Syngenta.

Each of these events have been authorised as safe for food and feed use by the European Food Safety Authority and the European Commission.

“Time after time, the council’s DDGS and corn gluten feeding trials have proved to provide significant input cost savings," said USGC biotechnology advisory team leader, Gary Schmalshof.

"These approvals will allow the EU feed industry to have more choices with regard to feed ingredients, which directly impacts their bottom lines."

While these approvals are a positive step, the EU’s zero tolerance of unapproved varieties will continue to provide a significant market challenge.

“The EU needs to make progress in its regulatory processes in order to provide a long-term, permanent solution to issues of timeliness of biotech approvals and tolerances for low-level presence of unapproved varieties that meet internationally–adopted guidelines,” said USGC director of biotechnology programs, Rebecca Fecitt.

“We are optimistic these approvals are a step in the right direction and we will continue to work with the EU on this important issue.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Now there's a sentence for you: “The EU needs to make progress in its regulatory processes in order to provide a long-term, permanent solution to issues of timeliness of biotech approvals and tolerances for low-level presence of unapproved varieties that meet internationally–adopted guidelines.” What does it mean? If my memory serves me correctly, the EU has taken this step before, and individual countries have, correctly, kept the bans on this 'timely' nonsense in place
Posted by john Newton, 15/12/2009 9:24:37 AM
How about: The USA needs to make progress in its regulatory processes in order to provide a long-term, permanent solution to issues of timeliness of biotech rejections and absolute intolerances for low-level presence of unapproved varieties that meet internationally–adopted guidelines...
Posted by doyoufeellucky?welldoyoupunk?, 15/12/2009 12:46:16 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
10 December, 2009
11 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Has your farm business made a profit in 2009?

Yes - profit
(19.8%)

No - loss
(59.3%)

Broke even
(20.9%)

Total Votes: 450
Poll Date: 13 December, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...