News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Farmers say see ewe later to crop 

Farmers say see ewe later to crop

08 Feb, 2010 09:36 AM
A COMBINATION of low commodity prices, a lack of rotational options and the booming sheep meat industry has meant Australian farmers are likely to cut cropping acreage this season in favour of increasing livestock numbers.

After three years of near-record plants as farmers attempted to cash in on high grain prices, the pessimistic outlook for grain prices in 2010 means many farmers will be cutting their acreage.

Australian Crop Forecasters managing director Ron Storey expected a lower acreage when his organisation released its crop forecasts for 2010-11 in March.

“You’d certainly expect that after seeing farmers in south-eastern Australia going for broke on grain over the past few seasons that things would correct themselves a little.

“They’ve been chasing the high prices, and given there have been consecutive crops in many paddocks, I think people are running into rotational issues.

“The other big factor to consider is the good price of livestock.”

One trend beginning to appear is the reversal of new croppers in high rainfall zones back into livestock.

Farmers in traditional sheep or cattle farming areas were tempted into dipping their toes into cropping by the big margins available over 2007-08.

Frequently, they used contract labour to put the crop in, not having the plant themselves, and reports are that many of these new croppers are unwilling to go through the expense again.

Ryan Milgate, chairman of the MacKillop Group, a research organisation based on the SA – Victoria border at Naracoorte, said there was definitely a switch in his local Apsley, Victoria, district.

“Those blokes who got in when the prices were high for grain, I’m hearing some of them are switching back into sheep.

“Newer croppers in higher rain areas are going back to what they know best and into livestock if they can.”

Mr Milgate said many farmers in the south-east of South Australia and the Kowree region of far western Victoria were disillusioned with high input costs and the variable yield and quality of crops.

“People are switching back into sheep, but that in itself is a pretty expensive exercise these days, with ewe and store lamb prices so high.”

He said mixed farmers who had stuck with sheep throughout the cropping boom were reaping the benefits at present.

“With the high price of ewes and lambs at the moment, it’s a bit hard for those who got out of sheep totally to get back in, but those who hung on to some sheep are certainly pretty happy with the job at the moment.”

“Overall, you’d say the smaller croppers in grazing country are looking at getting out and the bigger guys will be cutting down their cropping program.”

Mr Milgate said the other big trend through his area, with the low price of feed grain, was for farmers to use feed grain stored on-farm to finish lambs.

“There’s quite a bit of feed barley going down the sheep’s throat,” he said.

“You’ve got guys with two or three hundred lambs who would normally quit them before Christmas who are keeping them on and carrying them through, seeing a better value-adding opportunity by using their grain on-farm, rather than selling it at the current prices.”

But it is not just farmers in high rainfall zones getting back into sheep.

Jabuk, SA, farmer Ian Farley is based in a region with a nominal 400mm annual rainfall, much less in recent years, and this year he will crop 60 per cent less than in 2008.

“In 2008 we were cropping 75pc of the place, last year it was just over 50pc, and this year we will be back to 30pc in crop.”

He said the lure of the red-hot sheep market had been too good to refuse, especially with depressed grain prices.

“Every year we have been sowing more pastures, some with Veldt grass and some with lucerne, along with planting some grazing cereals for winter feed, that has taken over a lot of the grain crop area.”

He said he ran both a self-replacing Merino flock and also produced first cross Border Leicester ewes, as well as his lamb enterprise.

“If it's done right, it’s a good business, and the risks are a lot lower than in cropping, providing you haven’t had to buy in the sheep.”

Mr Farley said the gross margins were just not there in his low-yielding country on grain.

“We budget about $160/ha to plant barley, and with the current price of at $135/t on-farm, that only works out at around the cost of production given our yields of around 1.2t/ha.”

“Prime lambs are going berserk, I sold some recently at $129 a head, the margins are far better than in cropping at present.”

However, the trend for mixed farm does not extent to committed no-tillers, many of whom have sold off sheep infrastructure and ripped out fences to make their paddocks easier to crop.

A report from the Western Australian No-Tillage Association (WANTFA) found the number of its members running livestock in addition to their cropping program had declined significantly in the past five years.

In 2009, 69pc of respondents had both livestock and crop enterprises, compared with 85pc in a 2003 survey.

WANTFA scientific collaborator from the University of Western Australia, Ken Flower, said economics was the main reason for members making the switch.

“Other factors could be that some growers want to maintain full stubble retention with no-till and feel livestock do not fit in to their system,” he said.

“However, many others do feel livestock fit into a no-till system.”

It appears that Australia will not be alone in having lower crop plantings, in particular in the wheat field, with the US Department of Agriculture saying it expects American wheat plantings to be down as well, as farmers respond to the market signals of low commodity prices by substituting into more lucrative enterprises where it is possible.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Rainbow chasing will only end in tears, by the time you have established yourself in the next big thing, it's usually in time to be caught in the glut. It was only around the time of the wheat board deregulation that some industry leaders were saying publicly that "we can never produce enough wheat" and "the price will never come back below $350/t". I watched older farmers at this particular meeting shake their heads in disbelief.
Posted by rod, 8/02/2010 7:26:39 PM
Yes we are older and wiser. We may not have letters after our names but we have seen it all before. Boom and bust. My family has owned our property for 50 years and in that time every neighbouring property has been sold. A lot of them because they chased markets to get rich quick and the rest is history. Farming is all supply and demand. We are price takers so we get screwed at every turn. The drought reduced stock numbers and forced up grain and fodder prices. When things return to a more equitable level watch the price of stock drops. It is amazing to see the price of boat sheep at the moment but don't expect it to last - it won't.
Posted by Helen Clark, 9/02/2010 8:16:32 AM
It all comes down to risk. The biggest risk at the moment is commiting to risk $240 per hect to grow wheat which may or may not grow or have a market for directly as a result of losing the national export wheat pool. The price of rail freight has gone up $20 per tonne, the figure of around $30 loss per tonne due to no more Golden Rewards, no more national pool hedging cost Australian grower upwards of 2 billion dollars over the last 2 deregulated years the direct loss of a lot of our best foreign markets, no promotion of our premium wheat around the world and now there is a glut of wheat the traders are selling Australian wheat against Australian wheat at reduced prices so they don't get stuck with it. Eastern state growers are holding back selling at below production cost prices so the traders have pulled out and concentrating trading in the West. All the extra risk and growers required to Hire an Advisor or risk all making decisions of marketing grain while running a business at the same time could end in disarster or concentrate where the least risk is at the moment 'SHEEP'. Well done Burke you are resurrecting the sheep job by killing the grain industry.
Posted by Mark, 9/02/2010 4:46:33 PM
This article would have you believe that farmers are getting back into sheep in a big way. Where i farm in the north west of NSW i dont believe it. I understand that many farmers in the south and interstate that have had a terrible run of seasons have done ok out of prime lambs and are cutting back on cropping. Specialist cropping farms throughout North west NSW parts of Victoria and WA wont be getting back into sheep. You just dont change enterprises over night and for the top grain farms in has been a 20 plus year journey of improved agronomics, technonolgy. It wouldnt make sense to compact paddock and spend heaps of money to cash in on lambs when a good season and more people doing it would see the price collapse, The reason most large scale croppers sold all their sheep 20 years ago.
Posted by CTF Farmer, 14/02/2010 7:50:04 PM
Rod, Mark & Helen have said it all. May I suggest you 3 are more focussed and talented 'journos' than any currently employed by Rural Press?
Posted by Oh please!, 15/02/2010 6:29:25 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
05 February, 2010
04 February, 2010
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...