News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 GM canola hits the shelves 

GM canola hits the shelves

14 Oct, 2009 07:00 AM
FOR the first time, locally produced genetically modified canola is entering our food chain.

From oils to margarine, baby food to snacks, muesli to dairy products, GM canola oil can be found in many processed foods, but consumers are oblivious to what food it is in.

A report released by Greenpeace last September said there was only one year left to stop the potential GM contamination of canola, and tonight, as part of the Sydney International Food Festival, a public forum will explain its concern about GM foods.

The forum, called "Out of the Frying Pan" will hear from the food writer and activist John Newton, the author Dr Carole Hungerford, the Greenpeace campaigner Rochelle Porteous and the chef Alex Herbert.

Ms Porteous said the risk of locally grown GM canola becoming part of Australia's oil supplies was a critical issue.

She said there were concerns about health problems, sustainability and biodiversity, apart from agricultural contamination. "There hasn't been any long-term tests on the impact on human health," she said.

"There have been a number of studies that have shown GE food to have serious health impacts on the immune system.

"We have studies that show over 90 per cent of Australian consumers want to know exactly what's in their food."

Alex Herbert, from Bird Cow Fish in Surry Hills, is one of more than 180 Australian chefs to sign the Genetically Modified Free Chefs Charter opposed to serving genetically modified or engineered foods in their restaurants.

The charter calls on the Federal Government to legislate for the compulsory labelling of all GM foods, as well as encouraging the NSW Government to reinstate its suspension on growing GM canola.

Ms Herbert said as the long-term implications of planting GM crops were unclear, people should not rush to plant something which may have negative consequences in 10 or 15 years.

The author of Good Health in the 21st Century, Dr Carole Hungerford, said there could be health implications for gut bacteria if GM food was consumed regularly.

"I believe that man's ingenuity can sometimes outrun his common sense," she said.

"The genes from GM foods can get into the gut bacteria and the gut bacteria is the most critical thing.

"Sixty to 90 per cent of your immune system is in your gut."

Dr Hungerford said the best defence against the increase of allergies and auto-immune deficiencies was to keep gut bacteria healthy.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I feel genuinely sorry for what this means to those canola farmers doing the right thing by not planting GM. It's those farmers that will hurt the most.

I for one don't buy anything with canola oil in its ingredient list. Or anything that has 'veg oil' as an ingredient, just in case (hard to trust someone's product when they try to disguise its real ingredients). I think more and more people, as they become aware of the ethical and health issues surrounding GM, will do the same.

Come on, growers, there's no need to be growing GM...please, for your fellow farmers sake, stop. And if nothing else, now more than ever, we need truth in labelling!

Posted by freeranger, 15/10/2009 7:19:08 AM
I feel genuinely sorry for farmers who can't use the technology because of outdated moritoria. Have your so-called truth in labelling, that won't stop growers using GM as a tool to rotate chemistry within their rotations (This is responsible agriculture).

Even if GM canola is discounted by $60 per tonne domestically it will still be grown because it is econically and sustainably a better crop than TT and IT canola. Australia has an insatiable GM canola market in Asia. I have witnessed first hand in Japan non GM canola and GM canola being comingled on a warf before the canola is crushed.

Posted by allmattergreen, 15/10/2009 9:58:40 AM
freeranger, the horse has bolted. GM oils have been in the Australian food chain since the mid nineties in the form of GM cottonseed oil. What are the ethical and health issues you mention?
Posted by david, 15/10/2009 11:38:43 AM
Those products which are approved by the OGTR are as least as safe as the non-GM version of the product. Products which contain a GM protein must be labelled by law. Liquids do not, by definition, contain a GM protein (ie a solid). You can use fat if you wish, or olive oil etc. That is fine. You can also be a Luddite, if you choose. That is fine, too.

Other people do not think like that and are open to change. They also have rights and should not be harangued for their choices.

Posted by belle, 15/10/2009 11:46:51 AM
G'day people, I agree, choice is great. But where does one draw the line? When there is potential environmental havoc that could be caused by GM, should that be forced on people in the interests of so called "responsible agriculture", or because some people feel it's a "better crop"?

And who decides who's choices are respected? I bet there's many a person in jail as we speak that would argue for more freedom of choice in what they do...

Many of my friends happily partake in GM products. I know they do. I don't judge them or harangue them every time I witness them doing so. But in conversation we debate the pro's and con's of GM, and in general, the consensus is: the risks are not worth it simply to financially benefit the few who do.

Posted by freeranger, 15/10/2009 12:50:18 PM
Belle, on page 25 of the Final Safety Assessment Report Attachment detailing a field trial of GT73 GM canola, ANZFA/FSANZ found 0.29 ppm of protein was present. So there IS protein in oil, so GM could be there, too. Until it is proved safe, I will not be feeding it to my family.

Most farmers are too sensible to go for the pro-GM spin - and now it looks as if grain buyers are not too confident of a market for GM either.

Posted by wild, 15/10/2009 1:52:34 PM
Bring in transparent GM labelling aka the EU (which is now starting to include products from GM-free fed animals) and let the markets decide.

Currently people are unwittingly buying foods with GM ingredients because labelling favours the producer and not the consumer.

GM growers can have their 'tool' as long as it doesn't affect my choice.

Posted by Hebe, 15/10/2009 2:24:16 PM
RUBBISH! It happened 2 years ago when the government legislated for increased tolerances. Most people don't think, and have been conned into thinking govts act in the public good. Fools! People need to understand that democracy means we elect our dictators! Educate; educate; educate, your freinds need you!
Posted by denis, 15/10/2009 2:28:04 PM
Doctors are beginning to speak out against GM. The US group AAEM said animal studies show there is a causal link between GM foods and illness. There has only been one study where GM food was fed to people. It showed that GM DNA was taken up by gut bacteria. Scientists had thought that this was not likely. Yet 70pc of our immune system is in our gut and allergies and digestive problems are rising enormously.

Is there a link with GM? Who knows, as no studies on the effect of introducing GM foods have been done, partly due to the lack of real labeling. GM has created superweeds in the US. GM crops are about making money for the companies that own the seed and the chemicals to be sprayed on them. These companies have pharmaceutical arms, too.

GM crops are nothing to do with feeding the world, helping farmers or giving anyone choice.

Posted by Fran, 15/10/2009 3:19:08 PM
David, what are the ethical issues about eating GM cottonseed and canola oil without being informed? You can't work that one out for yourself? What are the health issues?

We don't know, since there haven't been any studies whatsoever looking at human health endpoints. Protein and DNA residues in the oil weren't tested to determine whether they were novel. Novel toxins in the oil weren't sought.

As the GM DNA from this canola is reported to be comprised of sections from virus, bacteria, various plants and chimeric DNA, there are valid concerns about how our immune system will respond.

Organic and guaranteed GM-free honey only, for me.

Posted by Madeleine Love, 15/10/2009 3:49:04 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
08 October, 2009
07 October, 2009
13 October, 2009
08 October, 2009
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: For which levy rate will you vote at this year's WoolPoll?

0%
(43%)

1%
(9.9%)

2%
(32.2%)

2.5%
(4.5%)

3%
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 314
Poll Date: 11 October, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...